Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benito Mussolini rises to power
Essays on how mussolini gained power
The rise of Mussolini
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benito Mussolini rises to power
Mussolini's Rise to Power as a Direct Consequence of World War One
Italians were divided on their decision of whether or not join WW1.
Most Nationalists were in favour of joining, and although the King
wished for peace, the government decided to see which side would offer
the best terms. After signing The Treaty Of London with B and F which
offered them huge territorial gains they eventually declared war on
Austria in May 1915. The Nationalist poet d'Annunzio made a speech in
which he showed his enthusiasm for the war, "We shall now fight our
war, and blood will flow from the veins of Italy. We are the last to
enter the struggle but will be among the first to find glory". In
reality although Italy was on the victorious side they did not find
glory and their country was severely affected. Was it therefore
inevitable that someone with Mussolini's' personality and drive would
eventually take power in post war Italy?
WW1 proved disastrous for Italy, the land they had been promised in
the Treaty of London, the deal made with B and F was not given to
them. The people of Italy felt that the government had not delivered
what they had promised. D'annunzio who had initially supported the war
marched into the city of Fiume and took charge in declaration of
Nationalism in Italy. The government did nothing to suppress this
showing their weakness in failing to sort out Italy's problem at this
time, eg the economy and social state of the country.
Economically Italy was hit very badly by WW1, they had relied on
foreign loans to finance their war effort and once the war was over
Italy as well as the rest of Europe was now in state of economic
...
... middle of paper ...
...eventual march on Rome. However the march was not
necessary as the King invited Mussolini to form a government, partly
to stop the threat of Civil war but also as he told a confident at the
time, he wished 'To save a cabinet of poltroons and that in Mussolini
he had a Prime Minister who was really a man of purpose who will last
some time and has the will to act and act well'.
In conclusion therefore WW1 had been a huge factor in determining the
future of Italy and Fascism was able to grow out of peoples discontent
with the outcome. However even before the outbreak of war people's
faith in the government was already deteriorating. In addition the
threat of Socialism in Italy was hugely exploited by Mussolini and had
they or any other party had leadership qualities such as Mussolinis
who knows what might have happened.
that their power was being taken away slowly he gave them positions in the army
Ginsborg P (1990). ‘A History of Contemporary Italy: Society and Politics: 1943-1980’ Published by Penguin; Reprint edition (27 Sep 1990).
Comparing The Factors of the Rise of Mussolini to Those of Hitler A. Similarities: Benito Mussolini Adolf Hitler Decisions of the Paris Peace Conference Italy joined the First World War in 1915. Yet after the war Britain, France and other victorious allies did not fulfill their territorial promises as stated in the Treaty of London. Italians felt cheated. Since the Italian government failed to fight for the gains, it was deemed incompetent. Mussolini who promised revival of the glory of the ancient Roman Empire naturally got popular support.
government. He said the people had an absolute right, to rebel against any government that
William Lyon Mackenzie King was one of the greatest prime ministers in Canada, although he did not give a fascinating speech or had an exciting image and supported few radical policies . King’s opinions were very strong and would not be changed no matter what. No one could influence King and this was shown through his leadership during the Great Depression and the election in 1930.
In Italy, Mussolini’s Fascist regime may be attributed to the significant role football played in government manipulation and intervention towards its citizens. As football was known as “the sport for the masses”, its rise in popularity was the perfect opportunity for the Italian government to gain the nation’s public support. This scheme resulted to Mussolini’s relentlessness in terms of controlling certain aspects the sport had to go by, especially in the 1934 FIFA World Cup which was held in Italy. People believed that Mussolini orchestrated Italy’s victory to show the world their capabilities, and I quote Josef Bican, an Austrian player who played against Italy in the semi-finals, “Before we played Italy, Mussolini had a meeting… with the Swedish referee… and according to our coach, Hugo Meisl, he knew that the referee had been bribed… and would referee in favor of the Italians.” Its manifestation includes the influence football had not only on the Italian government, but towards the kind of system Mussolini wanted to impart to his people as well. With that, dominance on the field also meant power and superiority over other European nations such as France, Spain, and England. Thus, triumphant results did not only mean supremacy in race, but also in terms of governing principles and political structure.
Use of Violence as the Main Reason for Mussolini's Consolidation of Power from 1922-1928. Introduction Several reasons why Mussolini was able to consolidate his power between 1922 and 1928, such as Mussolini?s actions and strategy. co-operation with the elite and the failure of his opposition. However, I believe the most significant reason was the use of violence.
The Success of Mussolini's Consolidation of His Fascist State from 1922-1930 Benito Mussolini was able to take power in Italy after the famous long march in Rome in 1922. He then consolidated his fascist state of Italy between 1922 and 1930. He accomplished through well-designed strategies. Getting fascists into important positions Mussolini used changes in the law to strengthen his grip on Government in Italy. The elected council of Rome was abolished.
For a country to be 'great' it has to have a strong economy, a stable
Exploring the Similarities and Differences Between the Foreign Policies of Mussolini and Hitler Similarities - Both foreign policies geared to achieving great power status o Hitler: lebensraum, wanted to have living space for the expansion of the German race and control over other groups o Mussolini: wanted control over Mara nostrum, Abyssinia, …an empire - fascist states o had anti communist feelings; o both signed anti comintern pact 1937 against USSR o Spanish civil war against communism helping Franco secure power o Signed pact of steel in may 1939, a full military alliance - unhappy with status quo, wanted international prestige o national grievances on Versailles, people wanted to change Versailles o Hitler, product of WW1 who was angry at Versailles and wanted to see Germany achieve great power status o Mussolini; felt that Italy had been treated unfairly at Versailles and also waned to change the status quo o Because of this both built up armies, navies and air forces.. Italian air force to block out the sun + German luftwaffe… - both Hitler and Mussolini, used diplomacy and force as well as aggression to get what they wanted o Mussolini over Greece where it undermined the LofN, used force to take Abyssinia 1935 o Hitler used the threat of force to take Austria and diplomacy as well as force to take Czech and Saarland in 193… - by 1939 both had a common enemy; Britain and France - both were aggressive nationalists and glorified warw - both wanted empires; abysinnia and lebenstraum to distract from problems at home.. Differences - Hitler was more clear in his aims and ideals whereas Mussolini was more vague and opportunistic o Although Hitler did take advantage of opportunities such as Abyssinia crises to remilitarise Rhineland he was more structured in his aims for Lebensraum, unification of all Germans, building up the army and recovering lost territories § Illustrated by Hitler’s success after success ; Rhineland in 36,
Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini are leaders that have lead a country and either have made it better or worse. Hitler was the leader of Germany and Mussolini was the leader of Italy. They both made promises to their country saying that they will make it better. Some of that is true, but not all of it. This essay will explain the political ideologies, the treatment of their citizens, and the leader’s goals between Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini.
Mussolini's Consolidation of Power From 1922 to 1928, Mussolini managed to successfully maintain Fascist power because of a combination of different factors. Lack of political opposition was certainly an advantage during this time but it may have not been the main reason why Mussolini was able to sustain control. Other aspects, such as Mussolini’s exploitation of the socialist threat, propaganda and perhaps most importantly, the party’s relationship with the Catholic Church were probably more significant contributors to the period of Fascism. Despite this, the fact that there was little political resistance at this time certainly made it easier for Mussolini to gain and keep Facsist power.
Mussolini's Invasion of Abyssinia as his Greatest Success in Foreign Policy in the Period 1922-38
Italy and Germany entered World War II and saw the loss of many innocent lives, and saw the downfalls of the Axis powers. Hitler was a man that wanted one superior race, and with that thought in mind, he sent many people to their deaths for not being German. A Bible verse that reminds me of World War II is Matthew 26:52, “Then Jesus said to him, ‘Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword” (ESV). The Bible talks of their being a time for a war, but this Bible verse shows us that there are times when people should put down their swords and stop the fighting. Hitler and Mussolini sought to strengthen their government, economy, and people, but in the end WWII claimed the lives of many of their
as his own Foreign Minister. After 1936 he gave it to his son in law