Museum And Art Analysis

539 Words2 Pages

Imagine being inside a room with nothing inside. Afterwards, you proceed to empty your room and try to duplicate that room you were inside before. You stay inside your now emptied room. Does it feel like the same? Think of this activity as reproducing art. Art inside a museum and art projected from a computer screen are different (Berger 31). The interpretations between original and reproduced works are different as well. Berger describes in his book the bias of seeing what we only want to see. What a person sees is highly dependent on what that person knows (8). In relation to this, Berger also criticizes the originality and reproduction of art in the aspect of we only see art on what we know about it (31, 33). He started off taking into study the painting of Frans Hals about the "The Governors and The Governesses of an Alms House". Art historians interpret the art according to Hals' context of "public charity". …show more content…

Is it of different level from a reproduced one? Have the earlier example of art inside a museum and art projected from a computer screen. Inside the museum, one could see the exact details of how the artist painted it (Berger 31). It could not be exactly interpreted by the artist himself but it could be interpreted better because the interpreter has the complete picture of the painting. How about the one projected from a computer screen? One could still interpret it, but it would be totally different from the one inside the museum. The photographer of the art could have chosen an angle of the painting to make it look more beautiful; however, every angle, even the slightest difference, is not similar to the others. Even the brightness and contrast of the photo could make the interpretation different. Even adding text next to the artwork would make one's interpretation different (Berger 28). It could appeal to logic, context, or

Open Document