Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The outcasts of poker flat analysis conclusion
The outcasts of poker flat analysis conclusion
The outcasts of poker flat analysis conclusion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The outcasts of poker flat analysis conclusion
Bret Harte is an amazing writer the reason I say that is because look at the stories he wrote like The Outcasts of Poker Flat. He did a great job on writing that story telling how one man became a outcast and how he sorted help the other’s. Then on how he tells us about the main character Mr. John Oakhurst who kicked out of Poker Flat because he is a outcast person. Then also how Mr. John Oakhurst starts his travel with two women who are prostitute and a guy who is a drunk. Then how Mr. John Oakhurst picks up more people that are riding on a horse so he decides to let them come along. Here are something’s that I’ve found in the story of The Outcast of Poker Flat. The first reason why I think that Mr. John Oakhurst is a outcast is because he is nothing but a gambler that does nothing but causes trouble with most people. Then plus it doesn’t say that he has a family or friends so that makes him a loner which he is a outcast. The next one is that two or three men, conversing earnestly together, ceased as Mr. John Oakhurst had approached the mens and they had changed signifiant looks. But that is one reason why I think that Mr. John Oakhurst is a outcast is because all the people in the town and how they act and look at him like he is the bad guy which …show more content…
John Oakhurst is a outcast is because he gets kicked out of Poker Flat by the secret committee. The evidence that supports that answer is that the secret committee was getting rid of the people that was improper to the town and so was Mr. John Oakhurst. Then also how there where two men that was hanging from a tree that the towns people had hung up there because of something they did that was not good to the town. The evidence that support’s that is in regard of two men who were then hanging from the boughs of a sycamore in the gulch, and temporarily in the banishment of certain other objectionable characters. That’s the second reason why I think he is a outcast of Poker
In “The Outcasts of Poker Flat,” by Bret Harte, his portrayal of the “outcasts” in the story contradict with their stereotypes. This is seen with all four outsiders, but specifically with the gambler, Mr. Oakhurst. When thinking of a gambler, the words selfish, careless, unreliable, and irresponsible come to mind. However, Bret Harte contrasts with this stereotype by making Mr. Oakhurst a good hearted person. For example, when the Duchess declared she could go no farther, the gambler never once “thought of deserting his weaker and more pitiable companions.” Surprisingly, the gambler, who is thought to be undependable and self-absorbed, never had the idea to desert his companions. Another instance where Mr. Oakhurst breaks the common stereotype
John Oakhurst is the main character in “The Outcasts of Poker Flat”. John is an outstanding person and has some phenomenal traits. Such as that he is unusually calm, courageous, and modest.
Intriguing with sapphire eyes, a face chiseled out of stone, and golden ear locks stands Danny Saunders. In Chaim Potok’s book The Chosen Danny Saunders is a dynamic character. Son of Reb Saunders, a tzaddik, Danny lives a life infused with the Talmud. He studies and Talmud by heart but longs to study beyond religious manuscripts. The reading of non-religious books in Danny’s sect earns social rejection¬¬¬, but Danny yearned to study more and did so. Danny Saunders possesses a brilliant mind, a theological understanding, and an inquisitive sprit.
People within communities have a large responsibility to one another. Sometimes, however, that responsibility and respect seem to fade, as in “The Lottery”, Shirley Jackson, and “The Masque of the Red Death”, Edgar Allan Poe. Both of these stories describe settings in which communities fell apart either briefly or all together.
Queer. Exile. Class (Clare 31).” When Clare writes about losing home, he is writing about the parts of his identity that pulled him away from the place that he raised, as well as the parts of his identity that prevent him from finding home in other places (Clare 41). These words, queer, exile, and class, are both driving forces behind why Clare can’t find a place where he feels fully comfortable settling, but also these words give him a place where he feels at home. Clare explains his trouble finding home best when he describes, “I was a rural, mixed-class, queer child in a straight, rural, working-class town. Afterwards, I was an urban-transplanted, mixed-class, dyke activist in an urban, mostly middle-class, queer community. Occasionally I simply feel as if I’ve traded one displacement for another and lost home to boot (Clare 46).” This telling of Clare’s displacement highlights how his queer identity drove him from his childhood home, but his rural, mixed-class background prevents him from feeling content in the city (Clare 46). His queer identity, and his desire to escape his class situation, is part of what forced Clare into the exile that he experiences. However, these identities don’t only serve as a point of alienation for Clare but also as a place where he can belong. When talking
An outcast is a person who has been rejected by society or a social group, an outsider. Many times outcasts are rejected, isolated, and judged. However, what gives us that right to isolated, reject, and judge other people? When in fact you may not even know the person whom you are showing this impoliteness to. Djuna Barnes was an outcast. She has been rejected, isolated judged yet, she figuratively took the word outcast and made it her own. She speaks for those who can’t speak for themselves.
Similarly, Sinclair Ross depicts the theme of alienation through the character named Ellen, in the story “The Lamp at Noon”. We learn that the alienation in this story is also self-inflicted but to a different extent. One major difference is that in this case that she has become alienated from society due to geographical isolation. We learn that Ellen once came from a rich family and it seems as if the shift from city to rural lif...
Being an outsider can lead to a feeling of Inferiority. One of the characters that feels inferior is Ponyboy. In the novel, Ponyboy states that he doesn’t want to be a greaser or a hood. On page 132, Ponyboy said, “I don’t want to be hood, but even if I don’t steal things and mug people and get boozed up, I’m marked lousy. Why should I be proud of it?” Ponyboy explains that he does not to be a greaser. He is marked lousy largely because of his situation-one of poverty. Another example is when Randy meets Ponyboy at his house. He feels embarrassed because his house is not as well kept as the house of the Socs. On the next paragraph, the feeling of an outsider being isolated will be fully e...
Mr.Raymond is seen as an outcast because even though he came from an old and rich family, he still decides to socialize with the black community. Mr.Raymond alway drinks from his sack because people would say, “Dolphus Raymond’s in the clutches of whiskey—that’s why he won’t change his ways. He can’t help himself,...
Mr.Oakhurst is not an outcast from Poker Flats. .Even though Oakhearst is a gambler, he is an honorable man. He shows his goodside when he returns money to Tom after he wins from him. He takes on the leadership role in the all of outcasts. He does anything he can to protect Tom and Pineyand takes on the the largest part of the responsibilites. And even though he takes the scared way out of life by killing himself (which proves him the weakest), before he takes his life, he does what he can to keep everyone else alive. He makes the snowshoes for Tom and tells him to get help. He stacks firewood for the Duchess and Piney. So he is heroic in those ways.Oakhurst is a interesting character. He is called both the strongest and the weakest of the
The main charter of the graphic novel, Jimmy Corrigan, an outcast; but he is not what people would normally define as an outcast. Jimmy Corrigan is an older gentleman who is often alone and he often “indulges in spiteful daydreams laced with absurd elements.” (From Erdrich to Ware N.P.) Jimmy does not live with any family. His mother lives in a condo and Jimmy’s father is estranged. It is because that Jimmy is alone he has the wild imagination. Jimmy is isolated from his community because he does day dream so much. Jimmy day dreams so much because he is isolated from his community. Jimmy’s life is a paradox. What makes Jimmy different is not his gender, race, or not his economic status. Jimmy is different because of his age, and his mental state. Jimmy’s age keeps him isolated from the community because he feels old. Jimmy knows that he is not as young as he once was. The charter of Jimmy has let his life slip by and he is not sure how he fits into society. Jimmy’s mental state is also a reason why he is isolated. Jimmy’s father reaches out to him and Jimmy becomes conflicted. He is worried that he could hurt his mother who raised him by herself, even though Jimmy wants to meet his father. If one to analyze the charter of Jimmy he has many signs of depression. Jimmy has a hard time making descions, he is alone, and the drawings of Jimmy make him
Hart was more interested in sharing his personal beliefs. I often felt that he was using this book to boost himself and his childhood. In the beginning of the book, I cringed when reading him talking about his sexual education. This seemed more like a look into a narcissistic point of view jaunting on his sexual excursions. When he talks about not writing this section to inflate his own ego; it seemed just that a flaunting of his sexual journey to becoming a player of woman.
The theme of alienation has been depicted by two different characters in a resembling series of events. The two protagonists were alienated by their peers, inflicting negative consequences they must undergo. Both characters are finally pushed to alienating themselves rather than being alienated. In conclusion, the struggles both characters undergo are practically identical to one another. They have experienced alienation in such similar ways that you must ask yourself: are all those who suffer from alienation alike in more ways than one?
William Sidney Mount and Francis Criss strategically used the elements and principles of art to create The Card Players in the time period of 1845-1850 and City Landscape in 1934, respectively, in order to accurately portray the meaning and significance behind each aspect of each piece of art. While both pieces of art are similar in many ways, there are significant differences as well. Some of the major differences include the color palette that is used and the motion and focal point emphasized and created in The Card Players. The two pieces are similar in aspects such as the rhythm that is created, the lines created, and the values that are used throughout for many purposes.
The narrator is constantly attempting to escape the racial profiling by everyone around him. The failure of this attempt is apparent by the inability to get rid of the broken pieces of the bank, which represents the inability to escape from the stereotypes he is affiliated with. The narrator repeatedly alludes to the fact that he is generalized because of his black heritage and therefore, invisible to society. This is especially clear when he finds the cast-iron bank. The bank is in the shape of a black slave with stereotyped features. The fact that it was a slave with a generous grin, eating coins, was demeaning. It frustrated the narrator that this was a comedic object, plainly made for the entertainment of white society at the expense of the black people. The fact that the bank is “a very black, red-lipped and wide mouthed negro” (Ralph Ellison, 319), ...