Movie Review: The Movie Analysis Of The Movie 'Sully'

1337 Words3 Pages

On the fifteenth of January in the year of 2009, a routine flight to Charlotte Douglas Airport from LaGuardia had taken liftoff and was headed on its way. The Airbus A320-214 jetliner was ascending until disaster struck, literally. A flock of Canada Geese struck US Airways Flight 1549. The geese disabled both the right and left engine. The Captain, Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger and First Officer, Jeff Skiles had to make a decision for 155 lives. With the loss of thrust in both engines, clearing the New York City skyline would be highly improbable. With the help of a flight controller, an attempt is made to clear a runway for a safe landing back at LaGuardia. However, Sully soon understands the difficulty of doing so stating “We’re unable. We …show more content…

Some changes were made in the movie by the director Clint Eastwood and writer Todd Komarnicki that did not occur in reality. Likely these changes were made to dramatize the conflict Sully had with himself. In the movie, the National Transportation Safety Board’s investigation comes across as only few weeks long. When it actually was over 15 months long. The NTSB board members in the movie are also fictional. The actual members’ names were not used. The man who led the investigation, Robert Benzon, was unhappy with the portrayal of the board, “These guys were already national heroes… We weren’t out to embarrass anybody at all.” Benzon wished that the script didn’t try to create the idea the NTSB were villians or antagonists, they were simply doing routine questions and their jobs. When asked about it, the director Clint Eastwood responded, “Until I read the script, I didn’t know the investigative board was trying to paint the picture that he (Sullenberger) had done the wrong thing. They were kind of railroading him into ‘it was his

More about Movie Review: The Movie Analysis Of The Movie 'Sully'

Open Document