Morality In Sophocles Antigone

729 Words2 Pages

Antigone offers several justifications for disregarding Creon's law concerning her brother's burial. A few of them are considerably substantial arguments, others are not. For instance, her arguments on Human Morality, and Religious law, are perfectly valid. However, her arguments on Heroism and, since he is her brother and not replaceable, seem, not quite so valid. But, even if we don't consider Antigone's arguments in this matter, is her action right? After all, she completely disregarded and disobeyed Creon's law in this matter, and afterwards, defied him to prove that she was wrong. Usually, disobeying state law has every right in being punished justly. Speaking rudely to any court official, judge or monarch, can earn trouble. For instance, in Antigone's case, it only served to hasten her youthful death. However, the particular law, she disregarded, was …show more content…

Her strongest two arguments are Human Morality, and Religious law (which includes custom's). First, Human Morality. Human, according to the dictionary means 'of, pertaining to, characteristic of, or having the nature of people' . Morality, according to the same dictionary means 'conformity to the rules of right conduct; moral or virtuous conduct.'.In other words she is saying that in burying her brother she is acting in conformity to the rules of right conduct according to people. The Second stronger argument is Religious law. In order for a soul to pass the river Styx, it was obligatory that their body be buried properly. According to the Greeks, a Hero was supposed to be buried properly and paid the rights which were his. Creon, by refusing to allow Pollenycius to be buried, was, in fact disregarding the ancient laws of the Gods. Did Creon's law even have a right to contradict this? So far it looks as though Antigone was perfectly right, as deep as her arguments can attest. However, these were not the only arguments she

Open Document