Moral Ambiguity In The Kite Runner By Khaled Hosseini

819 Words2 Pages

Moral ambiguity is lack of clarity in decision making. Basically, moral ambiguity is when you have an issue, situation, or question that has moral or ethical elements, but the morally correct action to take is unclear, due to conflicting. The author of The Kite Runner is Khaled Hosseini, the book is about a boy named Amir and how much of a easy life he has at first, but near the middle of the book his life is horrible from there to the end of the book. Amir is my ambiguous character because he was not only a horrible person, but also a bad friend. Amir treated Hassan like crap, even when Amir was Hassan’s world. He’s a terrible person in many ways, Amir is a terrible person because he didn’t help anyone but himself. Amir says, “I ran because I was a coward. I was afraid of Assef and what he would do to me “(Hosseini 77). Amir didn’t help Hassan. Instead he ran away because he was a …show more content…

After some misgivings, Amir agrees to rescue Hassan's son, Sohrab, from an orphanage in Kabul. Amir even squares off against a Talib official who is actually Assef. In order to save Sohrab, Amir has to fight Assef, but Amir get beaten up badly by Assef. Amir can be seen as good because of what he done, he risked his life and almost got killed by Assef, but Sohrab saved Amir by shooting him in the eye with a slingshot. Even though Amir didn’t do anything good in his childhood and most of his adulthood too. He could have only saved Sohrab out of guilt and maybe some good intentions of actually being thought of as a good person for once, “Sometimes, I think everything he did, feeding the poor on the streets, building the orphanage, giving money to friends in need, it was all his way of redeeming himself. And that, I believe, is what true redemption is, Amir jan, when guilt leads to good.” (302). Amir is trying to redeem himself after all these years of being a coward and it pays off in the long

Open Document