Monster Theory In Frankenstein

812 Words2 Pages

Edward was found to be guilty of being a monster by the court. I find this verdict unjust and fundamentally flawed. Although, evidence was presented that Edward fits some definitions and theories presented by Cohen and Carroll; he did not fit them all. Edward is unconsciously fitting the role of a monster without being able to defend himself. Although he fits some definitions he does not fill all, therefore, he cannot be characterized as a monster. Edward knows that he is different and vulnerable to other people's judgment which is why he disconnects from society. The fact that he is different and acts differently then everyone should not classify him as a monster. Also, the confrontation with Jim should not be viewed as evidence for his conviction but for his defense. Furthermore, the verdict against Edward should be overturned.
Edward fits all seven monster theories presented by one of our key witnesses- Cohen. The seven theses are: (1) The Monster’s body is a cultural body; (2) The Monster always escapes; (3) The Monster is the Harbinger of category crisis; (4) The Monster dwells at the gates of difference; (5) The Monster polices the borders of the possible; (6) Fear of the Monster is a really a kind of desire; (7) The Monster stands at the threshold of becoming. However, he did not fit the definitions presented …show more content…

However, the town automatically assumed Edward attacked Kevin. This was partially because he had been found in someone's house and because of the fear they had of Edwards capability. The town suddenly realized that this was a child who was born in solitude and did not know all the social norms and possibly the difference between right and wrong. However, what I find interesting is that town only noticed this after they had found him commit something out of the norm. We see the town's true emotion toward Edward at the end of the

Open Document