Modern Art Influence On American Art

2118 Words5 Pages

Influence of American Art Galleries on the Perception of Modern Art Though Europe maintained the throne as King of the art world for centuries, the introduction of American Art galleries in the 20th century shuffled these roles. Gallery owners such as Alfred Stieglitz greatly influenced the American perception of new art forms such as photography and widened the scope for acceptable art beginning at his New York gallery, 291. As a result, the art market would later center around New York City, opening the doors for Modernist work to flourish in our country while fostering ideas for new art movements far beyond the American border. Alfred Stieglitz opened the 291 gallery in New York as a way to heighten the acceptance and appreciation of American …show more content…

Therefore, the more unfamiliar a painting or modern work of art looked, the more it solidified the nature of photography. Paintings no longer needed to look representational since the camera was now available to make such images. Concurrently, photographs need not mimic the qualities of paintings. The beginnings of the Dada art movement can be traced at Stieglitz’s gallery. In From “291” to Zurich, Ileana Leavens writes, “In 1968 William Agee placed the beginnings of New York Dada as early as 1910, at Stieglitz gallery “291”, where Benjamin de Casseres and Marius de Zayas ‘launched a full-scale attack on canons of art and morality...’ and defined ‘the attitudes later known as Dada,” (Leavens, 4). This idea largely forms the basis of Dada. Also noted by Leavens,“But as more and more radical forms of modern art and aesthetics were considered at “291,” this experimentation was to carry “291” beyond the realm of art, into anti-art, and with the emergence of anti-art as an art form, the principles of photography were once more reevaluated,” (16). At the same time, Dada applauded artwork that defied conventional definitions of beautiful art. For the first time, art had the ability to make statements through ugliness, forcing viewers to contemplate meaning and purpose rather than looking at images that applauded already accepted …show more content…

Those in attendance were jarred by the image, as Lunday notes“Opponents to the show took a contrary view-they felt as if their homeland was under invasion by a foreign artistic force and took up arms to defend America from the besieging Cubists, Futurists and Fauvists,” (Lunday, xi). The artwork here was unlike anything they had ever seen before. The notion of a “starving artist” was mildly relieved as a result of galleries. “Salons provided support and financial means that allowed artists to flourish,” according to Crunden (340). Since artists basic needs were covered through gallery representation, they were able to risk more with their creative endeavors. Rather than create stale work to appease customers safely into sales, artists could truly dapple in creativity and explore new realms. This notion favored the ideals of the 291 gallery, where artists were encouraged to experiment. As suggested by Lunday, “Modern art didn’t care about technique; originality counted more than competent execution,”

Open Document