Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dogberry character analysis in 'Much Ado About Nothing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Misunderstandings generate conflict and drive stories forward. William Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing is a play filled to the brim with misunderstandings and comedic situations. The constable of Messina, Dogberry, contributes to many such comedic situations with his twisted speech and juxtaposing sobriety. In this essay, Dogberry’s reality, character, and wrongly-used phrases are to be compared to actual reality. In his very first scene, Act 3 Scene 3, Dogberry is telling the guards how to do their job, but all wrong. At one point, the watchmen ask if they are able to sleep so as not to make noise. Dogberry then says, “Sleeping on the watch shouldn’t be a problem; just make sure that your weapons don’t get stolen.” This is a mistake …show more content…
Instead, Dogberry ends up believing what others say to him, including when Borachio and Conrade both say, “Marry, sir, we say we are none.” However, when a watchman says, “Marry, that he [Borachio] had received a thousand ducats of Don John for accusing the Lady Hero wrongfully,” thus accusing him to be a criminal, Dogberry also agrees. This is an example of what little thought Dogberry gives when he’s doing his job, and how his appearance of a knowledgeable and powerful constable is just an (unintentional on his part) act to cover up the reality of his irrational thought process. Though Dogberry does take his job very seriously, he just is not very good about picking his words, or his course of action. Per usual, Dogberry uses several malapropisms throughout the scene, such as when he condemns Borachio and Conrade to “everlasting redemption”. Here, assumedly, Dogberry means to use the word ‘damnation’. (Verges also uses this malapropism in Act 3, Scene 3). Most of Dogberry’s malapropisms are intended to portray his sheer inability to speak without them. However, when Dogberry says, “No, thou villain, thou art full of piety, as shall be proved upon thee by good witness”, he replaces ‘impiety’ with ‘piety’. Impiety and piety are polar opposites, and they reference how one is devout in terms of religion. This could, perhaps, serve as a reference to Borachio and Conrade doing as Don John wishes, and not out of their own desire to sin. Their ‘piety’ might be a reference to that they are devout to God, even after what they have done. After all, as said earlier, Borachio and Conrade said they “hope they serve God”. Dogberry exits the scene with a speech about how even though he falls under many societal labels, he tries his
Mark was the first boy that Jennings met in the home so he was the one to show Jennings the rules of the home. He slept with Doggie his first night but was panicked when he woke up to find Doggie gone. Jennings thought he had lost Doggie, Mark explained what happens every night with the animals that they are given. Jennings didn’t understand why the nuns would take them away, when he asked Mark “‘But why?’ Mark snapped and said ‘It’s the rules!’ ‘They cage the animals at night. It’s the rules.’”(Burch, 26) Jennings thought that Doggie was his, so when he was lent out to the Carpenter’s he didn’t realize he wouldn’t be able to take Doggie with him. Mrs. Carpenter was a very mean woman and Jennings just wanted Doggie back, he drew a picture of him hoping it would make him feel better. When he got back to the Home of the angels he was very happy to know Doggie was safe and he would get to sleep with him again. Shortly after Jennings got back to the home Sister Clair told Jennings she would be leaving to go help at a school, they were both new in the Home of the angels at the same time. When Jennings woke up, he found Doggie under his pillow with a note attached from Sister Clair that
Much Ado About Nothing. The Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1997. 366-398.
In the book it reads “Got no teeth, damn near blind, can’t eat. Candy feeds him milk. He can’t chew nothing else” (Steinbeck 36). This evidence supports my argument because it shows Candy’s dog being in pain. Candy’s dog deserves to be put out of his misery because of his suffering. In the novel, Of Mice and Men, it reads “And at his heels there walked a drag footed sheep dog, gray of muzzle with pale, old eyes. The dog stuggled lamely to the side of the room and lay down, grunting softly to himself and licking his grizzled, moth eaten coat” (Steinbeck 24). This shows the dog has been in agony and is very old with his suffering self. This evidence supports my argument because Candy’s dog needs help getting around how Lennie needs help when he gets in trouble. By shooting Candy’s dog, Carlson offers mercy to his dog. Mercy killing can also happen in real life
William Shakespeare is known for his use of dramatic irony and complicated story lines. In Much Ado About Nothing, he also adds in the element of disguise to what the characters know, or what they think they know. There are multiple characters trying to ensnare others in different facades, whether it be for better or for worse. The deception and illusion in the play can either assist the characters or completely shatter the situation, but in both cases, Shakespeare advises us to infer about what we hear or see before we jump to conclusions.
I think the Hound symbolizes government control. Traditionally, dogs, or “hounds”, are used to help firefighters. In the novel however, the Hound is used for malicious purposes. In fact, almost every night the firefighters watch the Hound kill animals for entertainment (29). The Hound is also used for eliminating citizens who do not abide to the rules. For example, when Montag is talking to Beatty about Clarisse's
Steinbeck connects Candy with his dog in order to suggest that humans have created a society where the weak cannot survive. Earlier in the book, Candy describes his dog as the “best damn sheep dog I ever seen” (Steinbeck 44). However, in lines 9 and 10, Candy reiterates that the other workers shot his dog because “he wasn’t no good to himself nor nobody else.” As soon as the dog outgrows its usefulness by becoming old and blind, the other tenants team up to ensure its death, suggesting how society joins together to dispose of those who are weak. Steinbeck then connects Ca...
Shakespeare's comedies A Midsummers Night's Dream and Much Ado About Nothing have many parallels while Measure for Measure is a problem play with a completely different tone. Comparing and contrasting these three plays provides insights into the views of Shakespeare concerning comedy.
In “Luke Baldwin's Vow”, 12 year old, Luke lives with his uncle, since Luke’s father passed away. Uncle Henry want’s to put down Luke’s dog, Dan, because he’s blind.Luke does not want to die because Luke really cares for Dan. Luke Thinks that Dan is the most important thing to Luke, and Luke’s traits prove it.
With its entangled double plots and eloquent use of words, Much Ado About Nothing is a story that has the ability to entertain the masses both young and old. Shakespeare’s use of figurative language along with situation creates such vivid imagery for which carries the drama from beginning to end. For example, when we look at Act 1 Scene 1 of the play ...
William Shakespeare's Presentation of Hero in Much Ado About Nothing "While there is much to delight a modern audience in Much Ado About
In William Shakespeare’s play ‘Much Ado about Nothing’, there are many instances of trickery and deception, which seem to surround the whole of the play.
Emotions are a vital part of what makes human’s separate from the rest of the animal world. They run how a person thinks, acts, and processes information. In Shakespeare’s play Much Ado About Nothing, the characters let their emotions get the best of them and this causes much conflict to arise in the play. The friar, being the only character to stay coolheaded helps to develop the plot of the play with the marriages as well as to aid the theme that using emotions to problem solve leads to disaster whereas using logic causes desirable results.
While a reader might argue that the men wanted to get rid of the dog because the dog was suffering, the men in fact desired to shoot the dog for the sake of themselves, not for the dog's misery. Disregarding Candy's affection toward the dog, they pressured Candy to let them shoot the dog. Carlson constantly kept insisting that if they shot the dog in the back of his head, "‘he'd never know what hit him'" (45). The ranchers' rapacious nature turns the intentional mercy killing into a
Steinbeck uses Candy’s old, smelly dog to help us understand Candy’s character. Very much like his dog, Candy has nothing to offer anyone but a small amount of comfort. Candy's dog was his only companion, but the dog was not a real companion in the human sense. The dog needed to be cared for and tended, much like George and Lennie’s belief that any comfort it offered was intangible and ultimately misleading. It’s through this use of imagery between Candy and his dog that we better understand the characters.
Dogberry's actions support the fact that he is a fool. In a scene from the Kenneth Branagh film, Dogberry and another member of the watch ride in on invisible horses, even going as far to make horse noises. We know for a fact that the filmmakers had access to horses because Don Pedro and company rode in on horses in the first scene at the beginning of the film. His fellow members of the watch didn't pay much attention to his orders and laughed at his actions. Dogberry also stumbles about and is sweaty as if intoxicated, this proves that he acts immaturely while on the job and doesn't take