Mindset Theory

1080 Words3 Pages

Carol Dweck and her colleagues began to research what enables some students to be resilient and enjoy challenges and why others struggled to do so. Her revolutionary finding was regarding ‘mindset’. The type of mindset a person adopts can have significant implications on their personal characteristics and how they view their own learning. (Dweck, 2006; Dweck et al., 1995; Dweck & Leggett, 1988; Molden & Dweck, 2006) According to Dweck there are two types of mindset- fixed and growth. P7- ‘This growth mindset is based on the belief that your basic qualities are things you can cultivate through your efforts. Although people may differ in every which way- in their initial talents and aptitudes, interests or temperaments- everyone can change …show more content…

If you have only a certain amount of intelligence, a certain personality, and a certain moral character- well then you’d better prove you have a healthy dose of them. Although this language is used in schools, neurological research (OECD, 2007) shows that as we learn, the brain continually adapts, indicating that belief in a growth mindset is scientifically accurate, and therefore a fixed mindset is a myth. Although it is important to define the meaning of both these mindsets, it is important to clarify that this use of language is not particularly used in the context of the mathematics classrooms. The emphasis is on all learners developing a growth mindset attitude towards mathematics and problem solving. Students with fixed mindsets tend to believe that intelligence is fixed and dependent on ability rather than effort, this means they withdraw from questions when they struggle. (Dweck, 2006; Robin & Pals, 2002). (Dewck 2012 P75- ‘So in the fixed mindset, both positive and negative labels can mess with your mind. When you’re given a positive label, you’re afraid of losing it, and when you’re hit with a negative label, you’re afraid of deserving it. ‘Students that adopt a growth mindset see mistakes as chances for feedback and are more likely to learn from them. They see success as the amount of effort one puts in, not intelligence or ability. Dweck (2006). …show more content…

It makes their confidence and motivation more fragile’. Many studies indicate that, contrary to popular belief, ability-centered or intelligence-centered praise can have a number of detrimental effects when children believe the praise to be insincere (Meyer, 1992), or when it makes them feel pressured to replicate or exceed their performance in the future (Baumeister, Hutton, & Cairns, 1990- find reference). Dweck and Mueller 1998 conducted a study of 400 fifth grade students in the United States, looking at the effect of praise on learners. The students were given a relatively easy test consisting of non verbal puzzles. Once they finished, half the learners were told the score and given praise based on their intelligence, the other half were praised on their effort. Subsequently, the students were asked to choose between two different tests- a more difficult one or an easier one. Of the students that were praised on their effort nearly 90% chose the harder test. After this, testing the students’ fear of failure, the test was significantly more difficult. The students that were praised on their effort worked much harder on the problems than the students that were praised for their intelligence. When the students were given the option of looking at exams of higher performing o lower performing students, the group that had been praised for their effort were more

Open Document