The U.S. should decrease the spending on its military. We would save money, lives, and provide USA benefits. It’d be best if we were to because it would provide a better economic status, a healthier lifestyle for our people, and outcome in a safer community for most cities. Saving money by decreasing spending on military defenses would help out a lot in the U.S. If the U.S. military were to save money, it’d be best to use that money on schools, hospitals, and poor communities or cities. Helping schools would be big, maybe even causing a higher percentage in graduation. Providing students with more advanced or smarter ways to learn would outcome in giving thus student a better chance to succeed. This may even cause more students to attend school and this would bring a better lifestyle (career wise) to those who strive for achieving in life. Money being used on hospitals would be outstandingly helpful. Better technology, more doctors, and more suitable ways to prevent sickness would benefit from saving lives. All this would be a big help those in need. Poor cities or communities that often get destroyed by natural disasters are in need of money and help. Giving to those communities would be a help to those …show more content…
would also save lives by decrease of military spending. They would saves lives by not putting them in danger and using those lives for better reasons or other safer jobs. Those served or serving in the military wouldn’t have to be putting their lives in danger for example like working in dangerous warehouses, nuclear power plants, or even around explosives. Instead of putting them in such harmful environments, using robots would be a less risk of getting into injury. For example like using the lives for being a doctor, teacher, city workers, etc. Jobs that give back to the community would be ideal instead of putting people’s lives in jobs near danger. It’d be fantastic if this were to take place causing all over the nation an aiding, improving
This paper will not bore with the definition of a profession. The United States Army is about more than words, it is about action. The action of over 238 years of tradition and service. The Army is a profession. A profession requires its members to adhere to prolonged training and learn specialized skills. A member of a profession must wholly commit himself and his skills to a calling which is entrusted by the public. A profession provides its members with intrinsic value which motivates beyond financial gain. The Army is a higher calling which demands all of these qualities and more.
“One of the most durable buttresses of militarism is found in the world of sport” (Martin and Steuter p. 131). Popular culture normalizes militarism in various ways, such as even a normal part of American culture as sports. Sports have done a lot of things for me in my life including changing my perspective of how I look at militarism. The military uses sports to advertise to a large group of people across America that will create a positive feeling towards war. Sports make the war seem normal to Americans when they associate it to militarism because many Americans play sports and can relate, but there are also consequences when normalizing the war. Popular culture normalizes militarism in so many ways, but the one aspect of it that normalizes war would be sports, through advertising and professional athletes, not only in a positive way, but it also recognizes the negative side of war.
The cost of the personnel has increased to nearly an unsustainable rate since 2000. Wartime funding was increased over inflation but the personnel has dropped. That being said, the defense spending in 2015 will be about $600 billion or 3.24 of the GDP. The defense budget pays into not only base defense, but also to veterans, civilian and foreign military aid. Each of these expenditures go into the percentage that the government is allocating to defense. Contrary to popular opinion, the money does not strictly go to weapons and military personnel. Health and care for military and veterans alike is on the rise. Retiree pay and benefits comprise the DOD spending for veterans. As discussed, funding for defense is important when it comes to sustaining our country and being a competitor for war
According to Cambridge Dictionaries Online (2016), defense spending is “money spent by a government to provide its military with weapons, equipment, and soldiers.” Defense spending is what keeps us safe and can include a wide array of expenditures from the acquisition of weaponry to the recruitment of a high school student for military training. Allocating funds for national defense within a country is of great importance because it “is one of the most important objectives of any government because national security is a necessary condition for a government to pursue other policy objectives” (Heo & Bohte, 2012, p. 416). Essentially, in order for citizens to feel safe and secure, it is important that the United States have a national defense budget in case a threat arises. Just like a homeowner takes out an insurance policy and has a security system installed, they hope that these will never have to be utilized, but are available if needed to protect the family. Similarly, the United States has equipped itself with air, naval, ground bases as well as a stockpile of weaponry in the event that we find ourselves offensively or defensively
The United States is an extremely affluent country, however, the U.S. government does not allocate its funds correctly. The government spends entirely too much of the budget on military spending. A segment of the military budget should go towards education. Education is completely undervalued in America and is often pushed to the side in political debates. Conversely, several of the top-ranked countries in education are also flourishing economically. Even though the U.S. is struggling to compete in education, the government has all but given up at this point. There are no signs of increased education spending or a decrease in military spending. How is this country supposed to continue to grow and move forward if the citizens
This imposes problems on the military and even on the government. One article states that, “Reduced budgets and the threat of sequestration create a sense of uneasiness in the ranks, and those fears are fueled by politicians willing to shut down the federal government rather than compromise.” (Army Magazine) This is because with the increase of budget cuts they start to cause problems for the ones who are working and this creates lost jobs in the military. No one wants to lose their job not even the ones that have put forth a great amount of time and effort in the military. For the ones that have been in the military for a long period of time this can actually have negative effects on their life style and even cause problems when returning
If there is a war between The US and another country and we have bases in or near that country war can be contained. Having these installations can keep war as far away from the united states as possible. The US having these bases in allied countries can also cause foreign countries to assist the US even if not specifically their war. When the Korean War started the US had bases in south Korea, this helped the US push back the North Korean communists and not take over South Korea. Having these bases can help the US quickly aid in natural disaster situations. If there is a natural disaster in a third world country that cannot afford to help its people, The Us can quickly respond and provide aid such as in The Haitian earthquakes. US presence can help in war and non-war situations such as natural
Since the attacks a number of civil defense programs have been initiated, which leads to more departments asking for an allowance within the national budget. This ultimately is leading to a larger and larger deficit that is quickly encompassing full percentage points of our GDP. There is a debate on how much defense spending is actually needed, because during the Clinton administration there were massive cuts to the defense budget, which lead to critics saying that our military force was in question. These same critics said that without the funds that had been cut-off by Clinton the military would spiral down to not being able to defend the homeland, let alone take on any offensive. The one argument I have is that President Bush was not in office long enough for his increased defense budget to take affect when he overthrew two regimes (Afghanistan & Iraq) with the same military force that was said to be completely ineffective because of lack of funds.
Firstly, there will be a lot of robot that can run faster than most of the human. Besides that, we can order robots to be in a meeting instead of us and they also can have a myriad of practical applications from defense and security to life science devices that could provide the elderly citizens with company and monitor their health on a daily basis besides as communication devices to talk with them.
If you think robots are the kind of thing you hear about in science-fiction movies, think again. Right now, all over the world, robots are performing thousands of tasks. They are probing our solar system for signs of life, building cars at the General Motors plants, assembling Oreo cookies for Nabisco and defusing bombs for the SWAT team. As they grow tougher, more mobile, and more intelligent, today’s robots are doing more and more of the things that humans can’t or don’t want to do and in many cases taking away the need for human labor.
Robots are made to run without flaws and can outperform the average worker. This is because there are fewer employees working that need to get paid. This is not a good thing as it might seem. In China, robots almost completely replace human workers to save money.
Using artificial intelligence will eliminate human error. Another positive would be the lowered risk of human harm because they won’t have to work the heavy machinery. This may decrease the amount of jobs in the manufacturing business, but it will also create new jobs. There is going to have to be someone running, building, and watching over these machines. The medical field will be changed for the better by artificial intelligence. Robotic radiosurgery can be implemented to shrink tumors microscopically. The precision of the machines reduce the amount of healthy tissue killed in tumor removal, and can leave smaller scars. This will greatly improve the quality of life for these patients, and will allow us to save more patients. It can also be used to train new surgeons in a virtual reality or real world setting. The students will be able to be fully immersed in real world situations they could encounter, but there isn’t the risk of killing someone. This can cut down on mistakes and improve the quality of education in med
Statistics have proven that more lives our saved with robots than by humans alone. The robots take on explosives, toxic material and combat zones and they take the fire instead of us. The military is spending billions on military robots but it is paying off decreasing the load and strain and deaths on the humans that saves lives. We are much more important than the robots they are replaceable not us.
Drones will help reduce cost of funding the military. Drones will replace different types of supplies and weapons. There will no longer be a need many military tanks. With the money that the government saved on the army, the government could use that money more useful things that can benefit the future of the country in a good way.
To conclude, robots could be the backbone of the society that will result in a technological revolution. Because of robots various characteristics that do not experience fear, nor exhaustion and they are precisely programmed, which make them able to help in case of need, housework, and factories production. Society needs to put the issue of robots into consideration to satisfy any shortage exists in the world.