Migraine Case Studies

671 Words2 Pages

1) What was the rationale for doing the study? (2 marks) The reason for conducting this study was to investigate how efficient surgery would be for patients who are experiencing a migraine in one or several areas. 2) Briefly explain the design of the study (2 marks) Patients who endured moderate to severe migraines were interviewed a physician and had to complete a migraine diary for one month and a migraine headache information form. Patients who met the criteria were then offered to participate in the study followed by completing several questionnaires. Before undergoing the surgery, the patients were then injected botulinum toxin type A in the area where they felt the most pain from their migraine. Depending on where the patients …show more content…

(2 marks) There were 49 patients who underwent the actual surgery and 29 patients who underwent the sham surgery. 59% of the patients who underwent the actual surgery experienced migraines with no aura, 22% experienced migraines with aura and the remaining 18% experienced migraines both with and without aura. On the other side, patients who underwent the sham surgery had slightly similar results; 65% experienced migraines with no aura, 27% experienced migraines with aura and the remaining 8% experienced migraines with and without aura. 5) What did the authors find? (2 marks) The authors found that the patients who underwent the actual surgery showed a greater improvement in comparison to patients who were used as a control in the sham surgery. In the actual surgery, 57.1% of the patients reported complete elimination of their migraine, while only 3.8% reported the same for the placebo surgery. In terms of improvement, 83.7% of patients reported they were feeling significantly better, while in the sham surgery group approximately 57.7% significant …show more content…

I say this because it is unknown whether or not the patients were actually having a migraine or not. Patients could just have been saying that they are having a migraine for the purpose of being included in a study. This could possibly be a prime reason for a high percentage of patients reporting the migraine was eliminated. Also, I agree with the researchers in terms of improvement not being seen since only one main site of the brain was operated. I also feel that the study did not go in depth when finding individuals to participate. When conducting a study, you shouldn’t just be asking individuals if they are having the problem; there should be some sort of test being done to

Open Document