Michelle Hoover Case

1466 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethics in patient care

I do believe that every person life is meaningful and precise no matter what they are endured in certain situation in life; unfortunately, Dr. Michelle Hoover does not seem to understand that. She is a staff member in a health care institution who work with patients from the range age 40 to 75-year-old, and take care of them when their physician is unavailable. These patients suffer all type of diseases, such as, high blood pressure, depression, diabetes and cancer. However, she thought an anti-depressant drug that is in Phase III randomized also in clinical trials can help these patients because the owner of the company will give her 3,000 dollars for each female patients she is enrolled in the study. In fact, me personally I do not agree in such untrustworthy experiment that first of all can cause harm through those …show more content…

Michelle Hoover interested instinct regarding the patient is immoral. Brody would not be agreeing with that idea because it is involved money and reject the moral of inform consent of the patients. He believed that, the theory and the practice of informed consent should be mention out clearly to these patients. In addition, it is not enough to see informed consent as a nonmedical legalistic exercise designed to promote patient’s autonomy, one that interrupts the process of medical care. It is the responsibility of the physician to tell patients what is happen so the patient can make the conclusion thought money from the company that manufactures the device for any work," and how much. And the variety of patient care must not be subjected to other concerns. I am stated a well-trained physician should not be thinking like that primary care of the patients should be relevant to him at all-time legitimately be expected. “According to this standard adequate informed consent is obtained when a reasonably informed patient is allowed to participate in the medical decision to the extent that patient wish” (Howard Brody

Show More
Related

  • Anna Garcia Case

    510 Words  | 2 Pages

    A well-nourished, well-developed Hispanic female named Anna Garcia standing at 65 inches, 165 pounds and in her late thirties was found dead in her house after her concerned neighbor Doug Greene was suspicions as to why she didn't take her dog out like she did normally, and why the dog was barking constantly for two hours. The police received a call from Greene on August 31st at 9:45 am and arrived at the crime scene at 9:56am.The police found Anna lying face down in the hallway. Authorities observed a pool of blood around her head and some vomit beside her. It was 73 degrees inside Anna’s house, while it was 92 degrees outside. Anna was last seen alive by her former husband, Alex Garcia the night before her death. Investigators measured her rectal temperature, and  came to a conclusion that she died at 7:00 am in that same morning. A medical examiner was also called to perform an autopsy to see what really caused Anna's death.

    Read More

  • Medical Paternalism Analysis

    780 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alan Goldman argues that medical paternalism is unjustified except in very rare cases. He states that disregarding patient autonomy, forcing patients to undergo procedures, and withholding important information regarding diagnoses and medical procedures is morally wrong. Goldman argues that it is more important to allow patients to have the ability to make autonomous decisions with their health and what treatment options if any they want to pursue. He argues that medical professionals must respect patient autonomy regardless of the results that may or may not be beneficial to a patient’s health. I will both offer an objection and support Goldman’s argument. I will

    Read More

  • Terrence Ackerman Autonomy

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Terrence F. Ackerman, as of the 1980s the American Medical Association had to include the respect for a person’s autonomy as a principle of medical ethics (Ackerman 14, 1982). This includes having the physician provide all the medical information to the patient even if the information could cause negative implication onto the patient. The physician is also expected to withhold all information of the patient from 3rd parties (Ackerman 14, 1982). Although it is seen as standard in today’s world, in

    Read More

  • Carrie Buck Case

    1243 Words  | 3 Pages

    On October 19, 1927, a “feebleminded,” young woman was robbed. This young woman’s name is Carrie Buck and her ability to conceive children was taken from her without her consent or knowledge. This decision would not only impact those already affected by unauthorized sterilization, but for those whom would later be sterilized. The Supreme Court’s ruled the sterilization of Carrie Buck to be constitutional on the grounds of it being better for society, better for the individual, and eugenic evidence.

    Read More

  • Avoiding Paternalism with Plato: Levin’s Doctor-Patient Tie

    1341 Words  | 3 Pages

    Patient autonomy was the predominant concern during the time of publication of both Ezekiel and Linda Emanuel, and Edmund D. Pellegrino and David C. Thomasma's texts. During that time, the paternalistic model, in which a doctor uses their skills to understand the disease and choose a best course of action for the patient to take, had been replaced by the informative model, one which centered around patient autonomy. The latter model featured a relationship where the control over medical decisions was solely given to the patient and the doctor was reduced to a technical expert. Pellegrino and Thomasma and the Emanuel’s found that the shift from one extreme, the paternalistic model, to the other, the informative model, did not adequately move towards an ideal model. The problem with the informative model, according to the Emanuel’s, is that the autonomy described is simple, which means the model “presupposes that p...

    Read More

  • Henrietta Lacks Ethics

    885 Words  | 2 Pages

    Skloot describes how, “When Southam began injecting people with HeLa cells in 1954, there was no formal research oversight in the United States.” (98) Southam’s use of HeLa cells sparked major outrage after headlines reading “PATIENTS INJECTED WITH CELLS NOT TOLD THEY WERE CANCER … SCIENTIFIC EXPERTS CONDEMN ETHICS OF CANCER INJECTION” surfaced. (99) In the end, the Medical Grievance Committee of the Board of Regents found Southam and his fellow researcher, Mandel, guilty of “fraud or deceit and unprofessional conduct in the practice of medicine.” (100) This trial lead to a major change in the policy of the NIH, making it so that proposals for research on human subjects had to be reviewed by independent review boards, ensuring that research done would meet ethical requirements. Henrietta’s cells still inspires important discussion on medical ethics -- as Debra DeBruin, director of the University of Minnesota Center for Bioethics states, “Researchers can take away an awareness of the impact that research can have on people. Rebecca Skloot does a great job of capturing different perspectives on the issues. Hearing a story like Henrietta Lacks’ takes us out of a purely scientific research perspective and

    Read More

  • Carla Washburn Case

    701 Words  | 2 Pages

    Carla Washburn, an incredible, inspirational woman that has sadly witnessed the 3 closest male figures in her life all pass on. This has resulted in Carla becoming depressed over the unbearable experience. Carla embraced in giving back to the community and that’s not surprising because she’s a person of spirituality. While, Carla is the client and is suffering through grief, it’s likely she’d benefit immensely from creating a program to work with the kids in the community and may give her a sense of worth she’s been seeking since these 3 tragedies.

    Read More

  • Decisions from Health Care Providers

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    Providers must act in the best interest of the patient and their basic obligation is to do no harm and work for the public’s wellbeing. A physician shall always keep in mind the obligation of preserving human life. Providers must communicate full, accurate and unbiased information so patients can make informed decisions about their health care. As a result of their recommendations, providers are responsible for generating costs in health care but do not generate the need for those expenses. Every hospital has both an ethical as well as a legal responsibility to provide care, even if the care may be uncompensated.

    Read More

  • Sandy Hearst Case

    555 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sandy Hearst should not be liable for any damages of the car crash. Sandy wasn't aware Dana Ivy was drunk when she left the party. Sandy put forths many times in her statement that Dana wasn't drunk, just outgoing. As stated in her testimony, Sandy said “ At one point was dancing on a table, but Dana has an outgoing personality” (Sandy Hearst) “ I know Dana wasn't drunk when leaving the party” (Sandy Hearst). Many times in Sandys and Dana's statement, they advise Dana wasn't drunk, the fact that the host plus the person suspected as drunk both advise Dana wasn't drunk refers to being a true statement. This substantiates the fact that Dana was the one who was suspected. Combined this with she knows her own body, indeed this means she wasn't drunk.

    Read More

  • Values, Beliefs, and Medicine

    540 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the medical field, there are many ethical dilemmas that a person could face. One of the major dilemmas in the medical field comes from being a doctor. While attending to a patient/ client the doctor may not know the best treatment or course of action to take because of the many options there could be. The values and beliefs of a doctor can’t interfere with the treatment of a patient/client. Their job is to be honest, benevolent, respectful, and to maintain confidentiality of the patient/client.

    Read More

  • Marcia Angell Research Ethics

    1683 Words  | 4 Pages

    Therefore, he states he wants to “focus the paper on the arguments offered in support of the claim that these trials were unethical,” (302). The first criticism states,” injustice was done to the control group…second, the participants in the trial were coerced into participating…third, the countries in question were exploited,” (302). Against the first criticism, he argues that if the clinical trials were not conducted the participants would not have received proper treatment. For the second criticism, he states that coercion, “involves a threat to put someone below their baseline unless they cooperate with the demands of the person

    Read More

  • Mary Barnett Case

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    As German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche quoted “It is impossible to suffer without making someone pay for it; every complaint already contains revenge.” The defendant Mary Barnett has been charged with the crime of second degree murder of the death of her six-month-old baby. In some sense, a mother who killed her own child ,out of personal relationships, is obviously guilty. However, based on current evidence, the verdict could be arguable. Barnett qualified some criteria of a second degree murderer such as intentionally leaving Alison alone to die in their apartment. Due to her mental state, Barnett was not aware she was leaving her children instead thought the child will taken care of whey she was at California. It comes to the reason that Mary

    Read More

  • Patient Autonomy Case Study

    1163 Words  | 3 Pages

    Autonomy is a concept found in moral, political, and bioethical reasoning. Inside these connections, it is the limit of a sound individual to make an educated, unpressured decision. Patient autonomy can conflict with clinician autonomy and, in such a clash of values, it is not obvious which should prevail. (Lantos, Matlock & Wendler, 2011). In order to gain informed consent, a patient

    Read More

  • Clinical Trials: A Kantian and Utilitarian Point of View

    977 Words  | 2 Pages

    The author explains how randomized clinical trials put physicians in ethically intolerable positions of choosing between the good of the patient and that of society. A kantian argument is formed when the author explains how the physician has the duty to tell the truth and not use the patient as a mere means to satisfy the needs of a majority. The well being of the patient is far more important than that of the society when it comes to treatment by personal physician, the Author suggests that there should be alternatives to randomized clinical trials to deal with observer bias and patient selection. The overall message of the article stresses the importance of a patient’s well being over the well being of a society because the physician has the duty to help the patient improve his/her health.

    Read More

  • Informed Consent Essay

    1386 Words  | 3 Pages

    Disclosure of pertinent medical facts and alternative course of treatment should not be overlooked by the physician in the decision making process. This is very important information impacting whether that patient will go along with the recommended treatment. The right to informed consent did not become a judicial issue ...

    Read More

More about Michelle Hoover Case

Open Document