Michael Yeager Murder Case

653 Words2 Pages

Respondent Michael C. was implicated in the murder of Robert Yeager. The murder occurred during a robbery of the victim's home on January 19, 1976. A small truck registered in the name of respondent's mother was identified as having been near the Yeager home at the time of the killing, and a young man answering respondent's description was seen by witnesses near the truck and near the home shortly before Yeager was murdered.

Police took 16.5 year old Michael C. which was also on probation in juvenile court into custody. Michael C. had been on probation since the age of 12. Approximately one year earlier, he had served a term in a youth corrections camp under the supervision of the Juvenile Court. He had a record of several previous offenses, …show more content…

Already on probation with the juvenile court with several prior offenses, Michael sought advice from his probation officer before discussing the present case with officers. His request was denied. Thereafter, Michael agreed to speak with officers without an attorney present, waiving his right to counsel. He proceeded to make incriminating statements and produce sketches that were similarly incriminating. At his murder trial in Juvenile Court, Michael moved to suppress his statements and sketches, arguing that his request to speak to his probation officer constituted an invocation of his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. The court denied his motion, concluding that Michael had waived his right to remain silent. On appeal, the California Supreme Court reversed, concluding that Michael’s request to see his probation officer constituted a per se invocation of his Fifth Amendment rights just as if he had requested an attorney. That Court also based its determination on state law requirements that probation officers represent the interests of juveniles, concluding that a probation officer fulfills a special role and juveniles may likely turn to their probation officers when dealing with police. Kenneth Fare, as acting chief probation officer, appealed on behalf of the State of

Open Document