Miami Museum Controversy

516 Words2 Pages

Conflict Description:
This is a conflict that has ended but revolved around naming rights at the former Miami Museum of Art. In 2011, the Miami Museum of Art was going through a capital campaign, when Jorge M. Pérez, a board member of the museum, took charge and was the first to support the museum’s capital campaign by contributing 35 million dollars, 20 million dollars in capital and 15 million dollars worth of artwork. In return, the Miami Museum of Art renamed the museum in his honor to the Pérez Art Museum Miami. The renaming has an “in perpetuity” clause, meaning the Museum was legally bound to keep this name forever. Pérez stated that he wanted “to have a legacy other than my family.” This led to several board members and the president of the museum to resign, and some major donors to pull their pledges to the capital campaign. One board member said against the renaming, “We feel we made a pledge to the Miami Art Museum, not to the Jorge Pérez Museum.” Furthermore, the land the museum is on was donated by the city and both city and county taxpayers contributed roughly 100 million dollars to the capital campaign. This led citizens questioning why Pérez’s smaller gift of 35 million was allowing him to have the building renamed when the citizens of Miami had donated a larger portion to the campaign. Also, critics are stating that naming the museum after Pérez as it could deter future high-level donors in contributing either monetary funds or artworks. …show more content…

We used a Google Form to create a voting ballot and then each of us voted for our top three choices out of the ten possible topics. The answers were submitted and recorded. With four votes, the PAMM conflict was

Open Document