Merchants Of Doubt Analysis

1515 Words4 Pages

Is climate change real? In Robert Kenner’s, Merchants of Doubt, he takes viewers of his movie on a journey to understand people hired to cast a doubt upon climate change and toxic chemicals. Kenner provides several examples of how casting a doubt through media and political organizations can create disbelief upon facts and scientific evidence. He provides evidence of how smoking and climate change have both undergone enormous scrutiny of not causing harm to both people and the environment through “political spin.” Political spin is defined by Britannica dictionary online as “the attempt to control or influence communication in order to deliver one's preferred message.” If we learn from the lessons of smoking, we can come to understand the …show more content…

Kenner outlines smoking as his first example, where these merchants create an elusion for people to believe tobacco does not harm your body. Stan Glantz, a hospital administrator became involved in the smoking debate. He stated, “people were smoking everywhere in hospitals, airplanes, and restaurants.” Glantz states, “one day he received a box of a 1000 page document that had been copied from the files of a well known tobacco company, in all 80 million pages of documents were collected. The results of the documents showed that tobacco companies knew in the 1950’s smoking causes cancer, in the 1960s it causes heart disease and nicotine is an addictive drug. However, Tobacco companies testified in front of the US Congress in 1994, that nicotine was not addictive or caused health concerns.” This was the beginning stages of political spin with tobacco companies not disclosing information that was harmful to the American people to maintain corporate interests and …show more content…

“Many people began to equate global warming advocates to communists, socialists and a threat to free enterprise. Also, many people feared government regulation and a change to their way of life.” In Merchants of Doubt, “Fred Singer and Fred Seitz both Physicist came out as big proponents that global warming is not real. Seitz worked for the Tobacco industry and blamed the smokers for smoking, so he had experience in discrediting truth. Fred Singer, also went as far as to state, Global warming is manmade.” Again, an example of discrediting the truth with the backing of corporations and political organizations with perceived experts in the field or area is a common approach and prevalent today.
Furthermore, Kenner, found that many groups who pose as groups representing interest of citizens actually represented the interest of big corporations. “George C. Marshall Institute is a Think Tank that lobbies to oppose climate change. Many organizations are funded by the Koch Brothers and oil companies such as Exxon Mobil. Many of the people who come from the Think Tanks are titled experts and don’t have the proper credentials to even be credible to speak out against climate change.” They use advertising, social media and lobbying to create misconception of what is really happening with climate change.

Open Document