Medicare Compliance Case Study

1145 Words3 Pages

Abstract The author will choose for the purpose of this deliverable three-accreditation program that could replace the joint commission. This author will compare these agencies to the condition of participation for Medicare and Medicaid services. Then will analyze the cost and benefits of each and their impact on stakeholder groups and rank them according to the author’s rationale. Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) The Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care was founded in 1979 and accredits ambulatory health care performed in ambulatory surgery centers, office-based surgery centers, and college health centers. The AAAHC has trusted status by the center for Medicare and Medicaid services and is one out …show more content…

Although special permission to determine compliance has been granted Medicare still reserves the right to survey an ASC after it is open. ACHC and Medicare COP CMS has established provider requirements for home health agencies, hospices, durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies that participate in the Medicare program. Therefore, Medicare requires organizations are accredited and approved by an accrediting agency such as ACHC before Medicare will approve them for participation. AAAASF and Medicare COP AAAASF offers three programs to become accredited that are CMS approved. The three programs are surgical (ASC), physical therapy, and rural health clinics. Facilities that have been Medicare certified may apply for the AAAASF accreditation. After AAASF accreditation is granted the state will not review prior to, but can and may conduct an inspection of their own. These inspections are separate from Medicare and exceed physical environment requirements by CMS. Cost and Benefits of AAAHC for stakeholder groups Benefits for patients under the AAAHC are being treated with respect, consideration and …show more content…

Additional AAAHC benefits for patients are the assurance of receiving the highest achievable level of care for recipients in the most efficient and economically sound manner. There are really no costs, just benefits for patients. Benefits for providers are having health care experts to develop, review and revise standards, and tools to support continuous quality improvement. In addition to providing better quality care, being appealing to patients, participating in the Medicare program for facility fee reimbursement and fulfilling requirement of third party payers. As for provider costs under AAAHC, “conversely, it is true that a facility can provide excellent care without accreditation and there are associated costs. The standards are extensive and it will require considerable time to gather necessary documentation, track data that are required, and to prepare for the actual survey” (Harmer,

Open Document