Medically Explained Symptoms (MUS)

942 Words2 Pages

Medically Unexplained Symptoms (MUS) are common across health settings. Physical symptoms which do not fit any known medical illness or where examination and investigation do not reveal any distinct pathology are termed as MUS. Many terms have been used as synonyms to MUS like functional, somatic symptoms, functional overlay, hysterical symptoms, bodily symptoms, and to the extent of labeling it as malingering or factitious. The prevalence of MUS is around 40-49% in primary care patients and likely to more in general hospital settings( Haller et al 2014). Chronic pain syndromes, Chronic fatigue syndromes, fibromyalgia can often be diagnosed to have MUS. MUS are often associated with significant health seeking behaviors, which can add on to …show more content…

There are three important ethical dimensions of while dealing with persons with Medically Unexplained Symptoms (MUS). The first is related to communication about MUS. When the symptoms are causing distress but there is no explanation offered or understood by the physician, it is rather difficult to discuss this with the patient and family member. The family members think that the person is ‘faking’ or reporting a symptom which is absent or unproven by the examination and investigations. This can cause further distress to the person with MUS. On the other hand, the patient would feel tense and more worried about the uncertainty due to the suffering and wondering if this is a sign of some dreadful disease. There are two types of dilemmas faced by health professionals regarding communication in such situations - how to tell and explain (something which has no explanation) and whom to inform - patient or the relatives. The issue of explaining versus not explaining becomes a challenge at times, due to the unique doctor patient relationship, with both the doctor and patient expecting a definitive response. Besides, it is often difficult to decide how to convince the nature of the …show more content…

This raises an ethical question on use of placebo in MUS. In such situations, patient and family may prefer complementary and alternative medicines. Very little scientific research on these complementary or alternative methods casts doubts on their effectiveness. These methods with unproven results however attract the gullible patients with advanced diseases. Interestingly, these systems provide explanation for the bodily symptoms based on their own philosophies. Similarly, numerous traditional therapies are also available, which may attract the patients and their families. Whether these therapies work on placebo effect is

Open Document