Medea's Action Analysis

913 Words2 Pages

In the play Medeaby Euripides some would say Medea’s actions or retaliations to a conflict are gruesome and they would disagree with her, but every one of her actions she justifies herself. Medea justifies her actions in two main ways one that she was wronged in marriage and in that era women had no say in society and they always had to respect and obey their husbands. Also during and before the play she was only being used by her husband Jason so he could get what he wanted and achieve power in society. Before the play starts Jason and Medea didn’t just come to be together with no story behind them. Medea was living in her home city Colchis. Now Jason comes to her city in search of the Golden Fleece to take back the throne from his uncle Pelias so Jason can become the rightful king. Medea ends up falling in love with Jason and helps him acquire the Golden Fleece by betraying her father and helping Jason kill her brother. After Jason and Medea leave Colchis they go to Jason’s home city to claim the throne. When …show more content…

Medea showed Jason nothing but faithfulness and love, but when Jason throws her to the side for a younger woman; thatwas the last straw for Medea, she had to satisfy her want for revenge and justice.In the play Medea by Euripides there are a lot of dark actions that occur within our Main character Medea. Medea though justifies her actions by saying she was wronged in marriage, by not having a say in whether or not Jason left her. She also justifies her reasons for being used the whole marriage and when Jason finds a way to achieve higher in society he leaves Medea for a younger

Open Document