Matthew 18 Summary

612 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Exegesis of Matthew 6:8-13

Matthew 18 starts out with "at that time" to signify that within the same hour of Jesus being accused of not paying the temple tax he also explains the humility it takes to reach the Kingdom (Mitch and Sri, 226). It would logically make sense because Christ speaks about the benefits and reputation of being sons of God who is the Kingdom; moreover, this could stir the disciples to question their own rank in the Kingdom compared to other disciples (Mitch and Sri, 226). However, the authors believe that the disciples questioning of their own rank was ignited by Jesus revealing Himself to Peter more fully because he knew Christ was the Messiah and Jesus gave him a higher authority in teaching and judicial matters by electing him as the rock of the Church …show more content…

I believe when Jesus was giving Peter more responsibility and privileges it caused the disciples to compete for becoming the greatest son of the Kingdom even though they were not fully aware of what made a son of the Kingdom great (Mitch and Sri, 226). Jesus clears up the confusion among the disciples by using a child as a "living parable" (Mitch and Sri, 226). In the early Jewish culture, children were looked upon as lowly people who were low on the social hierarchy and were always under the authority of those older than them (Mitch and Sri, 227). The authors use the words, "radical reorientation" to highlight the transformation of the disciples' views about the Kingdom (Mitch and Sri, 227). Jesus calls the disciples to "turn away from their worldly views" and humble themselves to the point of becoming like children; furthermore, this means they would be almost invisible in the world and be servants to all (Mitch and Sri, 227). Jesus makes a demanding command by saying we must be as humble as children to enter the Kingdom and if we do not humble ourselves we "will not enter" the Kingdom (Mitch and Sri,

Show More
Related

  • Jesus Of Nazareth Analysis

    470 Words  | 1 Pages

    Gerhard Lohfink, in his book, “Jesus of Nazareth” believes that Jesus’ person and ministry are intertwined, or actually one and of the same. After Lohfink clarifies the difference between the "reign of God" as distinct from the “Kingdom of God,” he asserts that in Jesus, there is this active, ongoing reign which is not only revealed, but is manifested in all He says and does. Lohfink states, that Jesus is “not just preaching about the reign of God, but He is announcing it,” going on to indicating that Jesus is manifesting this reign in His own self disclosure and the actions of His ministry. Jesus ways of teaching and interactions with others, is shown as compassionate, gentle, direct and personal, as well as definitive and bold. As we also find in Ch. 3, “All that is happening before everyone’s eyes. The reign of God is breaking forth in the midst of the world and not only within people.” (51) And for Lohfink, this is taking place in the actual preaching, actions and life of Jesus Christ. Simply, we are personally and collectively and actively a part of establishing this “reign” right here, right now. A “reign” of mercy, compassion, forgiveness, self-giving, sacrificial love, as well as of justice and peace.

    Read More

  • An Analysis of Exodus 6:8-10

    962 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Exodus 6:12, the Hebrew phrase “Poor Speaker” (NRSV), does not mean a physical speech disability in a literal sense, but rather it is used as a metaphor to describe Moses’ hesitation to speak to Pharaoh which was not only his own self-consciousness, but was also a product of Israelites disinclination towards him.

    Read More

  • How Should Jesus Parables Be Read Analysis

    1313 Words  | 3 Pages

    N.T Wright (2008) stated that “When we read the scriptures as Christians, we read it precisely as people of the new covenant and of the new creation” (p.281). In this statement, the author reveals a paradigm of scriptural interpretation that exists for him as a Christian, theologian, and profession and Bishop. When one surveys the entirety of modern Christendom, one finds a variety of methods and perspectives on biblical interpretation, and indeed on the how one defines the meaning in the parables of Jesus. Capon (2002) and Snodgrass (2008) offer differing perspectives on how one should approach the scriptures and how the true sense of meaning should be extracted. This paper will serve as a brief examination of the methodologies presented by these two authors. Let us begin, with an

    Read More

  • The Role Of Greed In Puritan Society

    1255 Words  | 3 Pages

    “ ‘Certainly you are also one of them, for your accent betrays you.’ ” Then [Peter] began to curse, and swore an oath, “ ‘I do not know the man!’ ” (The Oxford Annotated Bible with Apocrypha, Mathew. 73, 74). Strong and bold, Peter swore to never disown Jesus; however, Peter lied to himself, Jesus, and the other disciples. Moreover, Peter, acting greedy and selfish, chose not to suffer with Jesus, yet escape freely. In other words, lying to the people and disowning Jesus, Peter proved to be self-serving. Realizing his mistakes, Peter devoted his life and love to the Lord, purifying himself from the sins he committed. Similarly, in Puritan society, Puritans initially were seemingly self-serving people, fighting for their chance at being predestined.

    Read More

  • Autism, Multiple Personality Disorder and Socializing

    1968 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...hem. When Jesus saw this, he was indignant. He said to them ‘Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. I tell you the truth, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.’ He took the children in his arms, put his hands on them and blessed them.”

    Read More

  • Exodus 16: Divine Provision and Gratitude

    2236 Words  | 5 Pages

    9Then Moses said to Aaron, "Say to the whole congregation of the people of Israel, 'Come near before the LORD, for he has heard your grumbling. '" 10And as soon as Aaron spoke to the whole congregation of the people of Israel, they looked toward the wilderness, and behold, the glory of the LORD appeared in the cloud. 11And the LORD said to Moses, 12"I have heard the grumbling of the people of Israel. Say to them, 'At twilight you shall eat meat, and in the morning you shall be filled with bread. Then you shall know that I am the LORD your God. '”13In the evening quail came up and covered the camp, and in the morning dew lay around the camp. 14And when the dew had gone up, there was on the face of the wilderness

    Read More

  • The Parables in Matthew Chapter Thirteen

    1194 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Parables in Matthew Chapter Thirteen The Parable of the Sower is one of seven parables in Matthew, chapter thirteen that are from familiar ideas and sources, and natural to men. (Broadus, 285) It was normal to see a farmer sowing grain in Galilee. The "truth" is that this parable was designed to teach. The varied types of soil are the emphasis in this parable, rather than that of "the sowing of the seed ("word," v.19) of the kingdom."

    Read More

  • Matthew And Luke Essay

    742 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since Matthew and Luke are not modern day biographies, they do not follow the standard that we imagine. I think the explanation for the combination of similarities and differences comes from the fact that the Matthew and Luke are styled differently and also have different audiences. Since Matthew and Luke are interpreting history for a specific audience, this would explain why Matthew and Luke contains differing details. For example, Matthew tells of the Wise Men that came to visit Jesus in Matt.2:1-12 while Luke tells of shepherds that came to visit Jesus in Luke 2:8-20. Since Matthew is styled for a Jewish audience, perhaps it is considered more impactful and stunning that wise philosophers came to worship a child. On the other hand,

    Read More

  • The Differences In The Gospel Of Mark

    803 Words  | 2 Pages

    I know who you are—the Holy One of God?’” and again in 3:11, “whenever the impure spirits saw him, they fell down before him and cried out, ‘You are the Son of God’”. The disciples are ignorant to fact that the man who called them to drop everything and follow him was the Messiah. Peter properly identifies Jesus in chapter 8 when Jesus asks who they believe he is, but later when Jesus goes into the details of his death Peter denies it and Jesus addresses him as Satan. This is also the point in which Jesus says, “take up your cross and follow me” meaning that they too will

    Read More

  • Revelation 18:1-17

    514 Words  | 2 Pages

    Revelation, the last book of The New Testament, is believed to have been written by the Apostle John circa 95-96 AD. The writings in Revelation revolve around the idea of the end of time, the second coming of Jesus, and the time of judgment. Revelation is believed to have more symbolism than most of the other books in The New Testament. Revelation 18:1-17 can be interpreted in a number of ways, but the most likely, when viewing this in a historical context, is that it is referencing the corruption of Babylon throughout time. This means that the author was not simply talking about what was occurring within Babylon at that time of the writing, but also what has previously occurred. By looking at what was occurring in the city during the time in which it was likely to have been written and other references to Babylon within the New Testament, it is obvious that the author’s discussion of corruption within the city was referencing more than what was happening at the time. Although some readers may interpret the text to be symbolic in meaning, Revelation should be read with a critical min...

    Read More

  • Exegesis Of Matthew

    2222 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Bible contains two parts, which are the Old Testament, the so-called the Jewish Bible, and the New Testament. Though many different writers involved in writing the Bible, the two Testaments are not independent; they are cross-referenced to each other. Christians often treat the Old Testament not only as the historical documents or literatures of the Israelites, but also as an important element of the foundation of the New Testament, because the writers of the New Testament lay strong emphasis on the relationship of Jesus with the prophecies of the Old Testament, which includes "the birth of Jesus, the place of His birth, the flight into Egypt, the return to Nazareth, the role of John the Baptist in preparing Jesus for His public ministry," the crucifixion of Jesus, and the resurrection of Jesus.

    Read More

  • Exegesis Paper: Matthew 26:36-46

    991 Words  | 2 Pages

    Senior, Donald. 1998. "The Gospel of Matthew and the Passion of Jesus : Theological and Pastoral Perspectives." Word & World 18, no. 4: 372-379. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, EBSCOhost (accessed March 13, 2014).

    Read More

  • King James Bible Analysis

    754 Words  | 2 Pages

    The King James Bible is known as the Bible and in the Bible there is more than 1,200 years of books and different stories in 2 main parts. The Old Testament was written by the Hebrews and New Testament was written by the Greeks. It was completed in 1611 and was a main corner stone to European culture. Back in the day it was in Egyptian which meant that the priests had to learn how to read the Egyptian language. The parable called “The Prodigal Son” is in the King James Bible and when you read this there are some good lessons that you can get out of it and some bad things that you can get out of it.

    Read More

  • Miracles Performed By Jesus : Miracles

    1752 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...Peter with the rest of the disciples, and not that of the “over exalted” view some people of the time had created.

    Read More

  • The 3 Levels of Discipleship Taught by Jesus Christ

    1546 Words  | 4 Pages

    When Jesus called His disciples, His invitation was simple. He invited them to follow Him. The same is true today. In Matthew 28, Jesus gave His last charge to His disciples, and the charge was simple. He called his followers to go and make disciples. Much effort has been placed by Christians to fulfill this charge, commonly referred to as the Great Commission. Jesus chose to fulfill the implementation of the New Covenant through 12 men who He called, appointed, and commissioned, and he only had a few short years to prepare them for the task (Willson, 1990). His methods were unconventional and were revolutionary for that time. His disciples were to be trained extensively by Jesus, living with Him for three years prior to His ascension. He taught about servant leadership and its meaning for both the leader and follower Matt. 20:25-28). From the beginning, Jesus put in place a careful plan, and an examination of His actions in the Gospels showed that Jesus left behind the pattern to be replicated. His methods, which included the incorporation of three different levels of discipleship, included His interaction with Peter, His closest three (Peter, James, and John), and finally the group of 12. This paper identified and analyzed the three levels of discipleship Jesus modeled, these discipleship methods were then measured against modern leadership theories, and Jesus’s level of involvement and interaction with his disciples were critiqued in light of these modern theories in an effort to determine the effectiveness of this approach.

    Read More

More about Matthew 18 Summary

Open Document