Marxism In Animal Farm

1018 Words3 Pages

“Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely” Lord Acton. Although it has

been nearly over sixty nine years since the release of George Orwell’s “Animal Farm” the

ultimate meaning of this satire is still up for agreement. This paper will explore Orwell’s satirical

incite on how the corrupt nature of power on Animal Farm, mirrors that of Marxism and of 20th

century communism, but more importantly how in this day age Orwell’s classic allegory has

much needed relevance. Napoleon is not a just leader, or a democratic leader, nor is he even the

great liberator of Animal Farm. Like Josef Stalin and Adolf Hitler, Napoleon is a tyrannical

dictator. Throughout “Animal Farm” the political rhetoric and propaganda that Orwell fuses

together with the imaginary gives us a view on revolution can quickly turn into tyranny or in his

words how “…revolution always ends badly for the underdog” (Davidson)

During the early part of the 20th Century almost all European countries where empires

and ruled solely by monarchies, but there would be a swift change to that rule, which would

forever change Europe and its aristocracies. Communism based upon a variant of the ideology of

Marxism by the sociologist Karl Marx, gained a significant amount of support across Europe,

particularly in Russia. For Russians and Russia, the early part of the century had been a

tumultuous one. Famine, basis social structures, civil war and a huge World War where

everyday worries, along with a impassive dictator who could have cared less about the Russian

underclass. The rise of communism changed all of that. In a brutal yet seemingly short

Revolution, Russia’s power structure changed from Imperialism to Communism ostensibly
...

... middle of paper ...

...y, Animal Farm is “…the first British post-war II novel embodying a fundamental turning point in world historical mood.” The book

has been an everlasting testament throughout the times because of its enduring message.
“…Revolutionaries, once in power, often become as repressive as the people they have overthrown. All too often the oppressed become the oppressors.” (Simon). The struggle for preeminence between the two rival pigs, demonstrates how in both fictional and historical circumstances the abandonment of founding principles for the oppressive rules of government.
For Orwell the “turning point of the story was supposed to be when the pigs kept the milk and apples for themselves” (Davidson) signaling the pigs turn from a socialist animal utopia, to the adoption of a repressive regime that adopted the traits and behaviors of their original oppressors

Open Document