Marcus Caesar Brutus Character Analysis

No one is without flaws, a fact that many authors emphasize in their writings. It can play an important role in shaping the personality of a character and the events and conflicts of a story. The well-known play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare focuses on the hamartias of multiple historical characters, primarily that of Marcus Brutus. The concept of being an honorable person pervaded the plot and Brutus’s mind, and this idealistic view was the flaw that, ironically, led to his moral demise as he killed his friend, Caesar. It was Marcus Brutus’s sense of honor that ultimately led to his figurative death in the involvement in a murder. His pride in his nobleness played a crucial role from the moment of his introduction in the play, in which

Cassius, already aware of Brutus’s vanity, employed subtle techniques of flattery to manipulate him against Caesar, first by hinting that he was more honorable and respected than he believed himself to be, and offering to be a “human mirror” to show Brutus his own worthiness (I.ii.60-65). By saying this, he boosted Brutus’s ego by mentioning that he was not only righteous and well-liked, but also humble. He then reminded Brutus of his ancestor who “would have brooked/ Th’ eternal devil to keep his state in Rome/ As easily as a king.” (I.ii.168-170), thus enforcing the idea that joining him against Caesar is the right thing to do. Consistently throughout his monologues, Cassius talked about the justice and virtue of killing Caesar, appealing to Brutus’s hamartia. Brutus was so caught up with the idea of saving Rome from a tyrant that he overlooked the fact that he would be murdering his friend who was not even a king

He began justifying his actions to himself, soliloquizing that he was not jealous of Caesar’s power, but afraid for the Roman Republic of what Caesar may become, saying “I know no personal cause to spurn at him, / but for the general. He would be crowned:/ How that might change his nature, there’s the question.” (II.i.10-14). He passionately stated that although Caesar showed no signs of being corrupt, ambition and power morphed people into condescending, cruel rulers – thus killing him would be the heroic thing to do, saving the people from tyranny and oppression. (II.i.20-28). By predicting that Caesar would be a harsh king, and that he would become a king at all, Brutus made excuses for agreeing to kill Caesar and satisfied his own needs to be validated as an honorable person and a