Maple Leaf Shoes Case Study Answers

1097 Words3 Pages

Case Study One Question 1[Answer] A proposal to evaluate the exercise should contain evaluating employee responses, knowledge, attitudes, behaviour and impact on the organization. A number of subjective and objective methods can be used in grouping. The evaluation should also contain a cost-benefit analysis use the simple formula: revenue – cost = profit. Question 2[Answer] A low-cost method contains evaluating employee responses and attitudes directly follow their training. An expensive program would include associating training scores with job performance some months after the training. However, the less expensive method, the prime aim is to estimate how employees act about the program but deprived of drawing any assumptions about the impact on performance. For the more expensive method, performance pointers can be quantified into productivity gain, which would allow practice investigators to estimate the money return of the training (utility). T O (Training Group) O (Control Group) Question 3[Answer] The foolproof evaluation method is an experiment with fitting control groups should be designated in a place. However, condition the trainers are randomly assigned to disorder, then the post-test only project should be as given blow. …show more content…

She knows about the company, including the union representatives, and might be able to conduct the trading process, perhaps with the assistance of a negotiation professional. Time is a main concern in this case. One would expect that an HR manager would need at least a year to learn about the ropes which indicate that an outsider might not be effective idea. So, appointing a woman HR manager would specify equal opportunity for women, but gesturing a change in the company

More about Maple Leaf Shoes Case Study Answers

Open Document