Feudalism and Manorialism: Survival in Medieval Ages

957 Words2 Pages

In the dark period of the medieval ages, people were hopeless, but, with feudalism and manorialism, people finally had a stable life, including a life of community instead of fighting alone. With feudalism, social classes were created, and with these social classes, feudalism took its shape, contributing to the economy and military with the gifts and wants of the different people. Each role had something to contribute to the manor, which made it an independent system that helped people survive. The role of the shepherd was very important to manorialism and feudalism because it contributed livestock to the people of the manoir, which helped give people food and wool, and this wool helped the different classes of feudalism by giving them a lot …show more content…

Feudalism is a government, economic, and military system from Europe in the medieval period (Biel 9). Feudalism organized society during a dark time, and became a system of government that provided order. Because of this, people have a good life and had the ability to rise out of the dark ages (Biel 10). Land and protection was provided through Feudalism, and these would be a hard thing for people to get on their own, so no matter what class of the pyramid people were in, whether it was in the aristocracy or in the peasant life, Feudalism had it’s benefits. Feudalism was also a system of giving out land and duties to the people. The king would give out land to vassals, who would then divide the land to the peasants. The roles of the manor included the king, the vassal or lord, and the peasants. There were three roles in the feudal pyramid, kings, vassals, and peasants that kept Feudalism going. The king gave out his land to vassals or lords who pledged loyalty to the king, and peasants worked on this land to give the people of this land the supplies they need. There were distinct roles that people followed, and with this, everyone had items that they needed or wanted. To get these things, they had offers to get these things for themselves. Whether people were on the richer side (vassals/lords and kings) or the poorer side (peasants), everyone offered and received things, and this …show more content…

The king gave certain things to get certain things in turn. Feudalism was based on the giving of land in turn for services. The king gave fiefs (bit of land) to noblemen and in return, the noblemen supplied the king with soldiers for war (Langley 8). Along with offering up the land, the king got supplies to survive off of and money from taxes which was all provided by the serfs (Singman 72). The king was the highest rank in feudal society, with few people below him, and had the most power and control with everything feudalism related (Singman 3). Essentially, the king gave land to vassals in turn for protection, loyalty, and supplies/money. The king would need loyalty since he did not want people to rebel because they could overthrow the king, and he could lose what makes him special, his power. He would also lose protection from the military, which keeps him protected from enemy threats, supplies such as food, and money from the taxes to support himself. Giving out land worked out for him because of the things he got, and if he did not have the vassal's loyalty, he would not have been in the state of power that he was in. Vassals also were given things and received things in turn. Feudalism was based on oaths that that vassals made with lords, in which the vassal promised the lord protection and loyalty in turn for a fief. These gifts

Open Document