Malcolm Browne The Burning Monk

836 Words2 Pages

Malcolm Browne’s photo The Burning Monk challenges the ethics of protest, more specifically the ideas of self-immolation and thanatopolitics. The photo draws to question the ethics of thanatopolitical self-sacrifice and breaks down into two ethical perspectives. Perspective one, the self-immolation of the monk represents a dead man in a living body being put to rest, protesting the persecution of Buddhism evoking strong emotion and bringing attention to the issue. Perspective two, the practice of self-immolation only brings to light a problem for nothing to be done, emotions provoked by the practice overcome the practical thinking of those affected, the guilt felt by those affected only serves as guilt and nothing more, self-immolation is an …show more content…

The photo was taken in 1963, nearing the end of the Vietnam War. Thich Quang Duc, the monk seen in this photo, chose self-immolation as a means of protest against the religious persecution of Buddhists by the Catholic -favoring government led by Ngo Dinh Diem supported by the U.S. The choice made is ethically licit because it has been made for a well-meaning, important cause and was meant to strike emotion into the hearts and minds of everyone who witnessed. In this case, what it was meant to do promptly happened: “The photographs caused such an impact all over the globe that it has marked the start of the rebellion of not just the Buddhist clergy, but of the common Saigon citizens as well. It has also prompted the then-US President John F. Kennedy to order a re-evaluation of the United States’ stand in the Vietnamese regime.” (Lomography). The monk is justified in his choices, he was demonstrating his death as an already dead man as a result of persecution to the masses around him in hope that he would spark some sort of well-meaning …show more content…

Initially the photo strikes the viewer with the focal point, the monk burning. It is obvious that the monk has deliberately done this and is carrying through with his decision as he seems to be completely still, and at peace. Secondly, the monk has strategically decided the location for his self-immolation to provoke the intended emotional reaction to its intended audience, his audience being everyone. Consequently, it is observed in the photo that none of the people around him seem to be doing anything about his act. Their decision to not do anything is ethically just as explained by Marko Stamenkovic “if the act was disturbed, it would have meant ‘saving one person’s life’ while allowing for the death of many others to keep occurring in the name of the necropolitical regime of power”. The interruption would defeat the purpose of the monks protest and the people around him understood this. This further justifies the actions of the monk, the people are validating his protest and have understood that there are

More about Malcolm Browne The Burning Monk

Open Document