Maladaptive Perfectionism Case Study

734 Words2 Pages

having varying study routines or levels of interest in this introductory Psych121 course.
The mean of procrastination was 3.18 (2dp) and a low SD of 0.68 (2dp). The low SD indicates a little chance of spread within the dataset. The mean of Adaptive perfectionism was 3.26 (2dp) and the SD was 0.72 (2dp). Like earlier, The Low SD of Adaptive perfectionism statistics indicate a low chance of variability in the dataset. Both procrastination and perfectionism had a high average occurrence in the data set than maladaptive procrastination.
The mean of Maladaptive perfectionism was 2.47 (2dp) and a low SD of 0.74 (2dp). The also Low SD of Maladaptive perfectionism statistics indicate a low chance of variability in the dataset. The mean Maladaptive …show more content…

0.35). We can establish it is a negative, significant relationship as the r value is negative (-0.92). The relationship supports my hypothesis as it indicates that those who average higher on the procrastination score tend to have lower test score. The P value is as 0.35 which indicates a moderate chance of a random occurrence.
Surprisingly, academic performance and maladaptive perfectionism are considered invalid. (r(523) = 0.2, p.674).This is because the p value is much to high (.674) to be considered a valid correlation. The unusually large ‘p’ value indicates a high chance of randomness occurring in the data. The relationship does not support my hypothesis, nor does it follow previous findings as it indicates those who score high on the maladaptive perfectionism tend to have a higher mark on their academic performance.
Supporting the hypothesis, four out of five examined correlations indicated to have a relationship. With the exception of Performance and maladaptive perfectionism, these results indicate a high levels of procrastination, Maladaptive and adaptive perfectionism and academic performance are

More about Maladaptive Perfectionism Case Study

Open Document