Main Themes Of Season Of Migration To The West By Tayep Salih: A Comparative Analysis

1719 Words4 Pages

In one of his speeches, Tayep Salih states that “one of the main themes of Season of Migration to the North is […] the confrontation between the Arab Muslim World and the Western European one. […] I have re-defined the so-called East/West relationship as essentially one of conflict, while it had previously been treated in romantic terms. We know better now” (Hassan, 248). Salih’s confrontation with the West may be seen as an attempt to avenge the devastating consequences of its colonial past, reclaim the image of the African and Arabian, exposing the inherent artificiality and repressive attitudes embedded in its derogatory, misrepresented portrayal. However, Salih also shows it as an encounter that delves into the present complexities of …show more content…

In Salih’s confrontation with the West, one hears the echoes of Chimamanda Adichie’s crucial question, “How can we resist exploitation if we don’t have the tools to understand exploitation [and negotiate this new world]?” (HY, 13) and one is able to see how Salih deals with such an issue. The world of the Sudanese suffers from its own traditionalism in addition to its colonial past which eventually, to borrow from Achebe, falls apart because of their failure to reconcile local practices and beliefs with Western knowledge and consequently, fails to reclaim their lost identities through such synthesis. Hence, Salih’s confrontation with the west confirms and critiques the dissonance between the north and the south as well as the conflict within the south itself, exposing the misconceived belief of “see[ing] with one eye, speak[ing] with one tongue and see[ing] things as either black or white, either Eastern or Western” (SMN, 72). Thus, reverse colonisation as anti-colonial resistance as well as a regression into traditionalism are not solutions, they must be fruitfully brought …show more content…

This notion is reminiscent of Edward Said’s understanding of the oriental as an artificial, false concept created by the West to describe the East. Mustafa Sa’eed echoes this notion numerous times, “This Mustafa Sa’eed does not exist. He is an illusion, a lie. I ask you to rule that lie to be killed. Why don’t you sentence me to be hanged and so kill the lie?” (46). Similarly, the narrator asserts that “if we are lies we shall be lies of our own making”. Both characters become a mouthpiece for articulating an awareness of the illusory thinking contended by Salih. However, underlying their statements is something more crucial: the narrator’s assertion cannot be an alternative to the lie that Mustafa claims he is, simply because they are inherently the same thing. Both are artificial constructs and both depend on exclusionary, rigid notions of what it means to be Eastern/Western and both necessarily rely on the other in its construction. Salih concedes sameness in accepting or opposing the Western and foreign or the Eastern and traditional and illustrates how embracing either one can valorise similar boundaries, impoverish and envelop people and nations into similar catastrophes. He proposes a nuanced understanding where the clash between the East and the West, the North

Open Document