In recent years, non-violence has become a virtually significant way of personal practice of being harmless to self or anyone else. it means the lack of desire to harm or kill. The concept comes from the belief that people don't need to hurt others, animals or the environment in order to achieve an outcome. it's also been avoided based on traditional moral, religious or spiritual principles. Gandhian nonviolence is an evidence from historical examples that nonviolent action can be an effective method of social action. it played an important role to change some political cultures of particular countries to better aspects of new political philosophy. Later on to be the inspiration of big movements to civil rights in other countries.
In 1930, Gandhi developed the idea of making salt as a challenge to British rule in India. The British had applied a monopoly on salt manufacture and tax on salt. Due to salt's role of being a basic commodity that led to create a massive opposition to the British. Gandhi aimed to make the salt a symbolic form of action to challenge the government in order to increase the civil disobedience. A peaceful march had been organized to the coastal town of India within 24 hours with freedom speeches and announcements
…show more content…
He declared through an open letter to the Lord Irwin, the Viceroy, politely requested reasonable demands for making salt otherwise a civil disobedience to be followed. This put Irwin in an awkward situation, if he accepts Gandhi's demands, he would appear weak and if he doesn't, it would increase the opposition level (Dalton, 1993). Few weeks later, hundreds of peaceful protesters moved forward where got beaten by British police, which received worldwide news coverage. Then, Gandhi got arrested but the non-violence act against the salt tax continued for nearly a year to end up with Gandhi's release from jail and negotiations with the British government (Dalton,
In India, a reformer named Gandhi lead his followers across the country to protest the British salt restrictions. These restrictions prohibited Indians from collecting or selling salt, which was very important to Indian cuisine. Indians were forced to purchase from the British who placed a tax on salt. To help his people, Gandhi resisted the British salt policies and started a civil disobedience. When Gandhi and his followers accomplished their travels, they planned on making salt from seawater. Gandhi and his people's dedication to resistance spread across India. In a result, many got arrested including Gandhi himself. Although in prison, the resistance still fought on. This resistance easily helped grant India’s
The mission of Gandhi’s life was to help the people of India free themselves from British rule. Many people have struggled for independence. They have fought bloody battles or used terrorism in an attempt to achieve their goals. Gandhi’s revolution was different. He succeeded as an independence leader with the use of nonviolent methods. The young Mohandas Gandhi did not seem as a boy that would become a great leader. He changed as he studied in Britain and practiced in South Africa. He fought for the rights of Indians in both South Africa and India. Gandhi believed that all people in the world are brothers and sisters. He didn’t hate the English. Actually, he saw a lot that was good about them. His nonviolent means of revolution was referred to as satyagraha, which is a combination of two Sanskrit words, satya, meaning truth and love, plus agraha, meaning firmness. Many people were influenced by satyagraha.
When you are fight to get peace and fairness back to your government, does it involve nonviolent or violent acts to get what you want? When Gandhi came back to India after getting his law degree, Gandhi started a movement to bring peace and fairness back to their government. What made Gandhi’s nonviolent movement work? The reason Gandhi’s nonviolent movement worked was because he didn’t believe in segregation, didn’t follow the British’s rules for Indians, went to jail for his movement, and he was determined.
Nowadays, this concept of using nonviolence is hard to achieve. This is because people think that peaceful protest aren’t effective compared to taking action with their hands. One example is the Blacks Lives Matter Movement. Although there are peaceful protest, there are times when people turn violent against police. This can be counterintuitive since watching these harsh actions by protestors, people start forming negative views about the organization. This leads to people not supporting the cause anymore. Without the support of the public, an organization can’t
“Non-violence is a powerful and just weapon without cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it. It is a sword that heals.” - Martin Luther King Jr.
Gandhi served 2,338 days in prison -- 3.5 years-- just to prove that violence would never be the answer. When Gandhi heard that his fell Indian protesters had been sentenced to three months in prison he stated, “ If these men had committed an offense, I had committed a greater offense and I therefore asked the Magistrate to impose upon me the heaviest penalty…. I well remembered that I … did not feel the slightest hesitation in entering the prisoner’s box” (Document C). This proves that Gandhi was more than willing to prove to the British -- ruling India -- that he
Gandhi once said “An eye for an eye and the whole world is blind.” This is true in most circumstances but there are exceptions. By comparing acts of nonviolent civil disobedience with acts of violent civil disobedience it is apparent that force or violence is only necessary to combat violence but never if it effects the lives of the innocent. A recurrent theme in each of these examples is that there is a genuine desire to achieve equality and liberty. However, one cannot take away the liberties of others in order to gain their own. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that political change would come faster through nonviolent methods and one can not argue his results as many of the Jim Crow laws were repealed. Similarly, through nonviolent resistance Gandhi was able to eventually free India from the rule of Britain. It is true that sometimes the only way to fight violence is through violence, but as is apparent, much can be said of peaceful demonstrations in order to enact change. Thus, it is the responsibility of we as individuals to understand that nonviolence is often a more viable means to an end than violence.
Under British rule in India, the British were harshly oppressive and only interested in exploiting products from India for their own use, causing many Indians to become extremely poor. They became so oppressed they were on the verge of violent civil disobedience, when Gandhi appeared to negotiate with the British threw non-violent tactics such as sit-ins and hunger strikes. The people were supportive on Gandhi and were set to become violent if anything happened to him. Things were resolved without violence.
Nonviolence has but one prescription for all social diseases. It prescribes Gandhi-brand aspirin for everything from a headache to terminal cancer. But the social diseases of the real world are complex, not simple.
The Salt March or Salt Satyagraha happened on March 12, 1930. This sparked the civil disobedience campaign that occurred in India. The Salt March was one of many things that the people of India did in order to obtain freedom from the British. There were a lot of people involved in the Salt March. Two of the biggest contributors were Mohandas Gandhi and Sarojini Naidu. They both were key people in the civil disobedience campaign. A lot happened for the Salt March to occur. There was heavy taxation on salt and that was something that the people of India needed. There was also a lot of struggle when the Salt March eventually happened. Nationalists and civilians partaking in the Salt March were put into prison. However, great things came out of the Salt March. People of India were now fighting for their rights as a human being. The Salt March set the flame for the rest of the civil disobedience campaign.
Mohandas K. Gandhi, a great Indian philosopher, wrote the essay “My Faith in Nonviolence”. His essay focuses on the use of nonviolence means on overthrowing the British rule of India. Gandhi’s main claim on this essay is that love is the higher law of life and that “every problem lends itself to solution” (p. 203) , if we followed that law.
There is a considerable debate about the precise meaning of nonviolence. Some people believe that nonviolence is a philosophy and strategy for social change that rejects the use of violence. In other words, nonviolence is a method for resolving a conflict without the use of physical power nor enmity towards opponents. Instead, it emphasizes you to look beyond convictions and one’s urge for victory, it is the motto behind the saying “hate the sin and not the sinner”. For others it is a way of living and an essential part of their values and norms, for those people, nonviolence is the road which will lead them towards attaining inner piece and moral satisfaction. “Learn and teach nonviolence as a way of life; reflect it in attitude, speech and action” say’s Gerber in his article The Road to Nonviolence. Thus making nonviolence the ultimate behavior towards achieving truthful, spiritual, loving life. Mahatma Gandhi, the nonviolence guru, defines nonviolence as “a power which can be wielded equally by all-children, young men and women or grown-up people, provided they have a living faith in the God of Love and have therefore equal love for all mankind”. (mkgandhi.org) Therefore we understand that nonviolence has some terms and conditions to be met; living faith in God, truthfulness, humility, tolerance, loving kindness, honesty and the willingness to sacrifice. ...
In an effort to help free India from the British rule, Mahatma Gandhi once again contributed to a protest against salt taxes, known as the Salt March. This protest advocated Gandhi’s theory of satyagraha or nonviolent disobedience as the nation came together on March 12, 1930 to walk the 241 mile long journey to the shores of Dandi to attain salt. Although some Indians criticized Gandhi for not achieving direct independence from the Raj or British rule, Gandhi’s execution of the Salt March helped to create a stronger nation for the Indians to live in. Gandhi motivated the Indians to act robustly against the injustices of the salt taxes through nonviolent means. This caused Gandhi to create a temporary compromising pact between Gandhi and the British viceroy over the turmoil created by the salt taxes.
Gandhi and King both agreed that nonviolence is accomplished by revolutionizing the relationship between adversaries, and that its strength lies in their commitment to justice. However, Gandhi puts emphasis on a need for personal suffering in the practice of nonviolence, a stance that is somewhat less aggressive than
Non-Violence: an Effective Weapon According to the Indian Independence leader Mahatma Gandhi, “Nonviolence is the weapon of the strong.” Many people equate nonviolence with pacifism and believe that violence is the only method with enough power to topple inequality and oppression. However, this is not the case. By the term “nonviolence,” Gandhi did not mean that people should react with passivity and submission.