Mack A Rhetorical Analysis Of Shakespeare

450 Words1 Page

“Literature is a comprehensive essence of the intellectual life of a nation” Stated by William Shakespeare, he is relating literature to life in a way that will make us understand it by reading Shakespeare. Why read Shakespeare? A real question and the search for a good answer, literature is a prime example of life and the way we live in our society. Mack constructs an effective argument that reading and understanding Shakespeare is a lesson in life itself through the use of rhetorical devices and real world examples. Using the technique and structure that Mack uses to advance his argument is his use of counterclaims in line 109 he states “Shakespeare isn’t just for literacy types” He is saying that Shakespeare is for anyone who is willing to read it, and he uses this to tell the college students they can learn to read it too which he is trying to give the students hope and gain their trust.” The obvious argument to the contrary is that reading Shakespeare is hard work and not particularly rewarding” lines 3-5. He is saying that by trying to comprehend what Shakespeare really means is hard and not really rewarding in the end, saying that sometimes it’s not worth it, but in his opinion it is. Even though reading Shakespeare is difficult , it is worth the effort. …show more content…

For example in lines 25-26 he states “The first time you listen to a piece of complex music, you hear but you don’t hear”. He uses this paradox because he is talking to college kids and they listen to music most of their day so it will grab their attention. Also “Shakespeare offers us a lens on the real world in which we live” lines 65-66, Mack uses this metaphor because the college students he is talking to will graduate soon and be out in the real world on their own experiencing real world situations. By reading Shakespeare it helps you better understand life and the real

Open Document