Macbeth Journey Analysis

1394 Words3 Pages

The Art of Deception on One’s Journey Leads to a Lack of Resolution and Personal Fulfillment

During the play Macbeth, the protagonist, Macbeth, takes part on a very long and perilous journey. But it didn’t have to be that way. In Macbeth, Shakespeare develops the idea that, while taking part in a journey filled with evil deeds, blame, and deceit, one slips further and further into insanity, losing sight of their former self in the process. That, through a combination of the two, one is unable to grow as an individual, and as each deceitful deed takes its toll, one’s mental state begins to deteriorate. Each deed making it more and more difficult for one to regain the lost pieces of their sanity.
Macbeth starts out the play as an honourable …show more content…

She is delighted by the idea of becoming monarchs, and eventually tells Macbeth to seize the opportunity while King Duncan is staying at their place. Macbeth, up until this point, has managed to talk himself into and out of killing the king, which shows that his morals are still present, but they are beginning to slowly erode. This is made evident when Lady Macbeth ultimately talks Macbeth into committing the treasonous act of murder. And thus the cracks on the eggshell become more plentiful and defined as Macbeth makes the conscious decision to kill King Duncan, and follows through. Leading up to and after the course of murdering the king, Macbeth is struck by stress and grief and he begins to lose his clarity of thought, which is made clear by his perception of the floating dagger and his conversations with Lady Macbeth afterwards about turning the oceans red with Duncan’s blood if he were to try to wash his hands. For once the cracks on the eggshell are present, they cannot be fixed, just as Macbeth, once making the conscious decision to commit murder, can never go back to living his former life as mere thane of Glamis. He was able to get away with the murder by blaming the guards and even Duncan’s very own sons as a way of not having to face up to the consequences of killing the …show more content…

Three witches tell him he will be king, his wife convinces him to kill Duncan to become king, Macbeth commits the act of murder, Macbeth becomes a tyrant who abuses his power especially towards those whom he fears, he has his best friend murdered, goes to the witches by his own will to ensure his sense of security, doesn’t mourn the loss of his wife, and is ultimately slain by Macduff. Macbeth’s character starts out very similar to that of Banquo, so by using Banquo as comparison, it becomes that much more clear how much the guilt caused by the facade he’s tried to uphold regarding killing the king has caused him. Each evil deed he commits turning into two more, two more acts of evil that Macbeth has to live with, and hide from others through deceit and blame. With each evil deed he holds onto, another piece of sanity is lost. But this guilt doesn’t go away, he’s merely prolonging facing his problems until the last possible instant he can, in which he still doesn’t face them, and as a result, going by what was believed at the time, Macbeth was sent to hell for his sins against the crown. That if one blames others for their own wrongdoing, they will carry that guilt, and it will have negative affects on their state of mind and their

Open Document