Lyndon Brook's Case: Are Self-Evaluations Being Hurt?

1591 Words4 Pages

Are Self-evaluations being hurt?
In this case, personality plays a major role in job satisfaction and job performance. People with positive self-valuations believe in their inner worth and basic competence but the protagonist Lyndon Brook had negative core self-evaluations because he did not believe in his own abilities and considered himself to be powerless when faced with challenging external environment. This ultimately led to his poor performance as he repeatedly pondered over his inexperience rather than taking the assignment as a career advancing opportunity. Neuroticism, self-esteem, self-efficacy and locus of control constitutes the four core self-evaluations of every individual. We will analyse Lyndon Brooks’ decisions through these …show more content…

This further added to management’s lack of faith on him and casted doubt on his credibility.
Locus of Control:
Brook attributed his failure in the special promotion project to external factors like inexperience of his team members and a deep budget cut by the management. Although these could be possible explanations for the setback, Brook failed to understand that his management style, communication and co-ordination with his team along with his lack of research and knowledge in the American African and Latino markets as contributing factors might be a reason too. Therefore Brook’s Locus of Control was external which means he attributed his failure to external factors but not to his personal traits or lack of competence.
An external locus of control made Brook happy for a temporary span of time as he transferred his guilt on situational factors, colleagues and management but in the second project when he was allotted the same markets, he was highly apprehensive and will have to reflect upon his shortcomings and overcome them in the long run to be successful in his career and achieve his goals.

Are attribution error …show more content…

Are perceptual distortions playing a role?
ANSWER: In the second part of the Jensen Shoes case we come across five types of perceptual distortions taking place. They are as follows:
• Selective Perception: It is the process by which individuals perceive what they believe in while ignoring opposing viewpoints. Lyndon Brooks, before joining the company, had a preconceived thought in his mind-‘to rise to the top rungs of a medium to large company’. Therefore, even before joining the company all the reviews that he was convinced that his job preference was in align with the company. Hence, he joined the company with the selective perception of what the company does and what likely he would be doing and that will be according to his choice of job.

• Projection: Also known as blame shifting. It is the process by which people attribute causes of negative events to others. When Lyndon was unable to meet his deadline of the project he blamed it on the inexperienced staff and low budget. Even Jane blamed her inefficiencies and inapt behavior on the work pressure by her

More about Lyndon Brook's Case: Are Self-Evaluations Being Hurt?

Open Document