Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History downfall of sparta
A essay about sparta
Ancient sparta history essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History downfall of sparta
“Most history is guessing, and the rest is prejudice.” ~Will and Ariel Durant, Our Oriental Heritage(1997). (Does this meaning of this book relate to my message?)
In Lycurgus by Plutarch(date), ancient Greek philosopher Plutarch writes about the mythical figure Lycurgus and the governmental policies that Lycurgus implemented in Sparta. Over the years, historians and students alike have used Plutarch’s work and studied the ancient laws of Sparta. In many instances, movies such as 300 dramatize and glorify Spartan life. Accounts of Sparta from Herodotus, Xenophon, and Plato have only helped to embolden the romanticization of the Spartan culture. Regardless of the great works on Sparta written by famous historians and philosophers, we should
…show more content…
This simple fact inhibits the ability for any historian to interpret Spartan history accurately. This problem applies specifically in the case of Plutarch, who wrote the Life of Lycurgus,(life or lycurgus by plutarch), more than 700 years after the Spartans leader’s supposed death. Laws are the subject of debate in the current time of any civilization, and even after the years where a civilization ceases to exist. Without written record, it is hard to even begin to objectively look at a civilization; any finding could be based on non-factual information. It is like building a roof on a house that has no foundation to begin with. The house, or argument, will eventually fall without foundational evidence. We as scholars and historians must have a solid base of facts before we can insert opinions and conclusions in the matter of cheating historical context. The lack of historical written records hurts the credibility of what actually was. If such written laws and documents existed in Sparta, then they would more accurately inform future historians’ opinions. Written evidence would be better suited to stand the test of time and critics. If historians can accurately look at a law or documents with the support of factual claims, then they can examine and understand the significance of the subject they are studying in its complete …show more content…
Plutarch states, “And this was the reason why he forbade them to travel abroad... Withal he banished from Lacedaemon all strangers who would not give a very good reason for their coming thither… With strange people, strange words must be admitted… He was as careful to save his city from the infection of foreign bad habits”(CITE). Lycurgus was afraid to have any foreign people not of Sparta descend to his city. He feared other cultures and what idiosyncrasies they would bring with them. This, is in turn, created a strict barrier between Sparta and the outside world. This fact contributes to the lack of observation what historians can only know about Spartan laws, on top of the lack of written laws. If there was no one to observe the culture, how can we as historians accurately report and learn from Spartan society? The fact is, we cannot accurately interpret Spartan law as historical
Prior, Plutarch accounts for the unequal social framework within Sparta, where tribal leaders owned vast domains of land, in great contrast to the average Spartiate. Furthermore, Hodgkinson suggests the success of social reform in Sparta stems from the redistribution of Messenian land and the Agoge; reinforcing the belief that dissent from this social order would threaten the established hierarchical status of the Spartiates.
As citizens of the United States of America, we are often blind to not only the current traditions of foreign nations, but also the historical traditions of early civilizations. For instance, many have heard of the Greek city-state Sparta; however, do they truly understand the impact of Spartan civilization in history? Sparta is quite unique in its structure and development, and its history offers valuable insight to early Greek civilization. In his novel Gates of Fire, Steven Pressfield works diligently to uncover the realities of life in Sparta during the Persian Wars. Though the novel is a work of fiction, Gates of Fire is astoundingly accurate in its historical detail, and offers readers the opportunity to have a greater comprehension and
Leonidas was respected in Sparta, it was not by his often effective but not morally decisions, it was to resolve an issue when he felt that somebody or something was trying to hurt Sparta. Leonidas was expected to put an end with some abnormal answer. The training, the form i...
Sparta was a strict military city-state. The people were Dorians who conquered Laconia. This region lies in the Peloponnesus, which lied in southern Greece. The invaders turned the conquered people into state owned slaves, called helots. Since the helots greatly outnumbered their rulers, Spartans established a strict and brutal system of control. The Spartan government had two kings and a council of elders who advised the monarchs. An assembly made up of all citizens approved all major decisions. From child-hood, a Spartan prepared to be part of the military. All newborn were examined and the healthy lived and the sickly were left to die. Spartans wanted future soldiers or mothers of soldiers to be healthy. At the age of seven, boys trained for a lifetime in the Spartan military. They moved to the barracks and endured brutal and extensive training.
There is a lack of first-hand accounts of the Battle of Leuctra. Most modern scholars base their analysis on known tactics, archeological evidence, and information provided by ancient historians who wrote about the battle. While a number of ancient historians and philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, and Thucydides documented various aspects of Sparta, most modern historians rely on the writings of Xenophon and Plutarch when addressing the Battle of Leuctra. Both Xenophon and Plutarch provided similar accounts of the battle; however, there are discrepancies such as the total number of forces on each side. Due to the likelihood these ancient historians had personal biases, and given that neither had first-hand accounts of the battle, I
Sosius Senecio who was a consular , which could mean that people who had an education and were of a higher status were to read his work. Since people who were in the higher levels of government would be reading his piece Plutarch would need to ensure that he wrote in a way that wouldn’t offend who was reading it. He was educated and studied in Athens , which may have helped him with his writing career. An issue that arises from Plutarch’s written piece is that Sulla lived around 138-78 BCE . This means that when Plutarch wrote The Life of Sulla, Sulla had been dead for several decades. This creates problems regarding his piece because the information that Plutarch used from other writers could be incorrect or over exaggerated to make things more interesting. Another issue is that Plutarch’s style of writing was to include himself in the story as though he were present during the events this creates more problems because some of the things that Plutarch wrote sounded very vivid. For example, when people were being slaughtered in Cerameicus Plutarch describes it with great detail as a horrible blood bath . This is an issue because he was not there when the event occurred and could have made up how the events transpired and looked that day. Plutarch also includes specific numbers throughout the text. For example, when Sulla’s army went to battle, Plutarch listed how many men had been lost in battle, he said that Sulla lost 23 men and killed twenty thousand of the enemy . It is skeptical to believe these numbers are correct because how were they able to keep track of how many were slain since the battle had occurred several decades beforehand. These problems mean that the information that we are reading today could be incorrect and can be misconstrued. We could be portraying people who lived centuries before us as someone completely
The book The Spartacus War by Barry Strauss is an in depth look at one of Roman history’s most legendary events, the gladiator revolt led by Spartacus. Spartacus has become a legend, creating a storyline that has inspired many movies and television shows, such as Stanley Kubrick’s epic Spartacus in 1960, starring the legendary Kirk Douglas. Spartacus has inspired a perfect mix of men over time with various backgrounds and beliefs, from Stalin and Marx, to Voltaire, and even to Ronald Reagan. How though, did Spartacus create a massive revolt of slaves that would create a massive problem for the mighty Rome? Strauss attempts to create a chronology of the Spartacus War using his vast knowledge of the Italian landscape, ancient documents, and archaeological evidence, as well as provide the reader with the historical reasons that might have created a perfect combination of causes to create the Spartacus legend.
Everyone has an ethnic background, whether it is Chinese or European, we all come from somewhere. Barbara Ehrenreich has come to the conclusion in her article “Cultural Baggage” that the race and religion of our ancestors should not be what defines us. While she agrees that everyone has different roots, she shows the reader that you do not have to be defined by your roots and that the traditions do not have to be followed.
During the first quarter of the year in WMST 1172, the most influential reading I read/listened to would be, The danger of a single story by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. This is because the idea of the single story proposed by Adichie related and linked to my own personal experiences with stereotypes made by others in the dominated white community I lived in for the first half of my life. Correspondingly, according to Adichie, people who know only one part of the story, not the whole story, create stereotypes. In other words, the stereotypes created are from incomplete stories individuals hear. And although they may be true, they should not be used as a way to define a group of people.
The one thing we know for certain about Spartan society is that we don’t know much about it. Very few documents and artifacts about the Spartans have been discovered, but the ones that have tell us everything we know. Two of these works are Plutarch’s On Sparta and Xenophon’s Spartan Society. One of the main things these two accounts focused on was the Lycurgan reforms. Through their stories and writings Plutarch and Xenophon had both some similarities and differences when talking about the political, economic, militaristic, and social reforms. One of the main differences when comparing these two writings is how Plutarch gives a historical account of Spartan society and tries to keep objectivity
The manner in which to agree or argue against the proposition statement involves a careful consideration of an interpreter’s definition and view of success. This paper will argue that Solon 's reforms were, in fact, more successful than Lycurgus’ reforms for Sparta, in terms of how Solon 's reforms were more impactful and practical in a developing world while Lycurgus discouraged change in the system. By examining how Lycurgus’ reforms limited growth and development of Sparta and it’s people and how Solon’s reforms paved the way of Athens’s stability and future success as a city-state, this paper will show that Solon’s reforms prove to be more successful than that of the Spartan lawmaker, Lycurgus. This point of argument is significant because
The biographies were possibly meant to reconcile the two groups by showing the similarities between each other and thus improve relations. He also seemed to used the texts to look further into aspects of cultures that he didn’t fully understand or was confused by. Plutarch lived centuries after the Sparta that he writes about, and probably used other historian’s works in forming his writings as well as most likely over exaggerating certain aspects of the Spartan culture. Many of his other writings centered around events that occurred long before he wrote about them. His Parallel Lives were also written without personal encounters with many of his subjects. Some historians claim that many of Plutarch’s works also include his personal experiences and ideologies in his works, some of which are presented as the experiences and ideology of those he was writing about. Plutarch may have been using some of his biographies to strengthen Roman- Greek relationships by creating comparisons of great heroes in the two
Ancient Sparta has rough organization of social life. According to Brand, due to the fear, because of conquered Helots rebellions they were forced to reorganize their government rule in vector of militarism, which led to inevitable change of social life (n.d., p.3). Spartans were obsessed with military supremacy, this even lead to infanticide when "weak or punny” babes were killed. What was interesting about their medical examination
"Plutarch, The Spartacus Slave War" In Spartacus And Slave Wars, ed. Brent D. Shaw (Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin's, 2001) 131-138
Because of the tranquil times, the civilization’s society had more time to focus on writing, math, astronomy, and artistic fields, as well as trade and metallurgy. Out of all the city-states of Greece, two excelled over all the rest, Sparta and Athens. Even though they were the most advanced and strong civilizations, they were bitter enemies. While Athens focused mainly on the people’s democracy and citizen rights, Sparta were ferocious and enslaved its original inhabitants, making them unable to leave and kept under a close eye to prevent insurgence (History of Greece:The Golden Age of Greece). Additionally, Sparta had strict and trained soldiers that underwent intense physical exercising and instruction.