Lunch In The Bag Program

1088 Words3 Pages

The research that involved Lunch is in the Bag was quite successful in the child care centers which they were tested in. In the introduction it talked about three main food groups that were focused on throughout the whole research. This was fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. Out of the three food groups fruits were the most eaten by children and whole grains were the less eaten according to The Healthy eating Index. The ones to both blame and congratulate are the parents (for these numbers). They are the ones who are responsible for what their kids eat and why. More than half of kids from ages 3 to 6 spend their time in child care centers and it has become more popular for them to bring food from home (Sweitzer 1058). After studies were …show more content…

They would be randomly chosen if they would be part of the intervention (experiment) or comparison (control) group. The evaluation of this whole process would consist of different types of activity logs, surveys, or interviews. The Lunch is in the Bag Program would educate the parents and children who were a part of the experimental group through a series of educational literature, the needs of the family, plus the outside influences that can help benefit the program. The input measures of the experiment dealt with more the parents information like their BMI, ethnicity, and salary (Sweitzer 1059).Teachers tracked everything they observed throughout the experiment in an activity log plus they have research team members educating different stations (Sweitzer …show more content…

It was a ten week experiment and it was organized in such an effective way. I really liked how the experiment itself ran for 5 weeks straight. That gives it so much time to effectively educate both the parents and the children. The 2 week follow up was also nice. In my opinion, I would have made the follow up 3 weeks just because it has been stated that it takes 14 consecutive days to make something a habit. So I would give them 14 weeks to use what they learn throughout the program and then on the third week see if it all the education and handouts are still effective. I do like how they gave both parents and teachers for basically participating. This money could’ve been used on stuff they might have to purchase from what they learn throughout the program. The whole experiment was a parent-child dyad per family. In my opinion it should’ve been both parents of the child. Yes the other parent who attending the program could educate the other one, but what better way to learn than through educators who know what they are talking about and getting some hands on experiences. I was very happy that they provided the parents with different types of handouts of what they were learning in every station for future references and so they can apply all that they learn in the child centers in their houses. I like how they also followed reputable guidelines, for example the CACFP guidelines. It was great that the program didn’t die out

More about Lunch In The Bag Program

Open Document