Lumpectomy Case Study

689 Words2 Pages

clinical dissemination results. The results show that use of lumpectomy increased significantly from 35.2% to 42.4%, in 1990. Lumpectomy was the treatment choice for younger women, patients with private health insurance, absence of axillary node metastasises, and treatment in urban hospitals. On the other hand, only 45.3% of women with Medicaid coverage who had a lumpectomy with radiation therapy, compared with 77.5% of private insurance subscribers and 88.1% of Medicare beneficiaries in Pennsylvania. This finding is troubling even though there was substantially more compliance in the later years of the study, with 60.0% of eligible Medicaid beneficiaries receiving follow-up radiation therapy in 1990. There was an important variation in the use of radiation therapy depending on the insurance type of patients. A study done by Norum et. al. [15] in 1997 performed cost utility and cost minimization analysis for comparison of lumpectomy and mastectomy in Norway. The cost of treatment for every single lumpectomy patients was 9564$ and for mastectomy patients was …show more content…

Women are more likely to undergo lumpectomy surgery if their physicians graduated from medical school after 1981 compared with the physicians graduated from medical school after 1961. According to a study done by Kotwall et. al. [17] examined the 157 hospital located in North Carolina. Using multiple logistic regression they calculated the yearly prevalence of lumpectomy in order to determine tumor, patient, and surgeon factors associated with lumpectomy. They conclude that woman younger than 50 years old and with small tumors operated by younger surgeons were more likely to undergo lumpectomy. The reason is that the surgeons trained after 1981 were trained to do lumpectomy surgery and are more knowledgeable about the research showing the safety of

Open Document