Lucretia Mott And Elizabeth Cady Stanton: An Analysis

1073 Words3 Pages

Women are raised to be a prize possessions. Patriarchy has been a constant epidemic throughout the years and the world. Men prance around showboating our very existence as if we aren’t equal to them, but even in our own gender women suffer from inequality. According to Davis the history of American feminism is incomplete. This essay will be extending into detail why there is inequality. There are two major concepts in women history that provide valuable information as to why there is inequality amongst women. First, it be will argued Davis’s thoughts on Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Second, this essay will explain how the three types of inequality plays a role. Thirdly, the essay will compare and contrast the social intersectionality …show more content…

These two women are known as the “history of feminism”(Da47). In this time period not all women was included in the movement, there were numerous women left out based on race and class. Lucretia and Elizabeth are middle-class white women (Da49). Who were only fighting for the rights of women in their standards. Because all the focus was on them the thought didn’t cross other minds that they weren’t fighting for blacks, or lower class women. These women came from being housewives, and didn’t like the standards of being a wife at that time. In fact Stanton contacted Mott because of her domestic situation (Da49). Society didn’t notice the blind spots placed in this movement because the founders where middle- class whit women. The thought of inequality was non-existence in this process Mott and Stanton wasn’t calling an end to slavery, they were feminist but wasn’t expansive. They normalized their characters, but yet black women where still …show more content…

Although it was challenging to find evidence that one differs from other, but they do. One major difference that stood out was the mindset of the different methods. Defranssico went from stating that’s focusing all the attention on one aspect is bad, to focusing on one aspect. A good part of the section was just about black women, but black women wasn’t the only ones excluded. The attention to intersectionality identities and oppressions are meant to highlight cultural identities (De21). The only problem with that is that is it shouldn’t be about culture it should be about equality. Which Davis made clear didn’t exist in the world of feminism throughout

Open Document