Loss Of Innocence In Frankenstein

882 Words2 Pages

In Frankenstein and “Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein,” the Creature is misunderstood and rejected by society despite his innocence at birth. In Frankenstein, despite living on the fringe of society, the Creature selflessly helps the people around him. For instance, he secretly assists Felix’s family survive the harsh winter (Shelley 78) and saves a young girl from drowning (Shelly 101). However, the fear that his stature inspires prevents any human being from communicating with him, and instead provokes violent reactions, notably the beating (Shelly 97) and the gunshot (Shelley 101). The violent backlash he suffers gives evidence of the society’s misunderstanding toward him: due to his physical ugliness, he is unable to find a human companion, …show more content…

This unjustified recrimination supports the fact that the Creature fails to find acceptance in humankind and resembles the injuries he suffers in the novel when people turn on him simply because of his frightening physical appearance.
While loneliness and frustration drive the Creature’s evil actions in Frankenstein, his motive for attacking Victor’s family in the movie is purely his desire for vengeance. In the novel, the misery experienced by the Creature causes him to release these negative feelings on Victor. For instance, the Creature says that the mistreatment he receives after offering help to human being leads to the hatred against “mankind” (Shelley 101) and “more than all, against him who [has] formed me, and sent me forth to this insupportable misery” (Shelley 97). In fact, he commits his first murder after being fed-up with human beings’ repeated hostile reactions towards him when he tries to communicate with them, namely after seeing his desire to have William as a companion denied by the little boy (Shelley 102). Moreover, the Creature asserts that he “shall be with [Victor] on [his] wedding-night” (Shelley 123) after Victor breaks him promises and …show more content…

In Branagh’s movie, many details about the Creature’s life is omitted or simplified. Branagh does not give as much attention to the Creature’s development as the novel does; in fact, never does the Creature meet a character similar to Safie, who brings with her a detailed story about Middle East’s culture and the background of Felix’s poverty, nor does he read books about Western history or Christianity. Instead, Felix’s family has a functional role in helping the Creature learn how to speak in order to move the plot forward. By not showing the rich cultural background acquired by the Creature in the novel, Branagh leaves out a big part of what would be the Creature’s identity in the novel when he narrates his life to Victor. Branagh rather uses the Creature as a way to reveal that Victor’s excuses for creating life are flawed. For instance, the Creature tells Victor that they, together, have caused two deaths and asks Victor directly: “did you ever consider the consequences of your actions?” (Branagh 89:22). By using the creature to directly question Victor’s morality and responsibilities, Branagh puts the focus on Victor’s flaws, showing him as a creator who does not take responsibilities for his act of creation. Branagh shows, using this relationship, that Victor’s

Open Document