Lord of the Flies by William Golding

983 Words2 Pages

Symbolism is using words, places, people, and objects for a meaning that is deeper than its literal meaning. In the novel, “Lord of the Flies,” William Golding uses so much symbolism that the novel could arguably be viewed as an allegory, or a writing with a double meaning. While not all of the symbols are very obvious, the novels title for example, a few of them are, for example, the conch shell, the fire and the parachutist are all very prominent symbols used by Golding. In “Lord of the Flies” there are so many different examples of symbolism that could make the reader believe that the novel actually contains two totally different stories, the literal story, and the symbolic story.
Before the reader even opens the book they are unknowingly presented with a major symbol in the novel; the title. "Lord of the flies" can be translasted to "Ba'alzevuv" (Hebrew,) or "Beelzebub" (Greek). It has been said that the novel's title may have been a mistranslation of a mistransliterated word, which gives those who knows the translation, the idea that the title is about a devil whos main focus is decay, destruction, demoralization, hysteria, and panic, which are all central themes in Lord of the Flies. The devil is obviously not present throughout the course of the novel, but William Golding created his own "devil" figure, his own spin on "Beelzbub," a more modern "devil;" the boys. At first, the boys in the novel were all on the same page, but as the novel progresses the "devil" figure emerges. The boys all split up, due to decay of the civilzation and their democracy that they created, leading to a more anarchist form of government (under Jacks rule,) and a struggle for power between two of the main characters, Jack and Ralph. Alth...

... middle of paper ...

... very obvious are the conch shell, the fire and the parachutist. "Lord of the Flies" is a novel that can be read multiple times, and be read differently every time, it is up to the reader to differentiate between the literal meaning of the story, and the symbolic meaning of this novel.

Works Cited

Cox, C.B. “A review of ‘Lord of the Flies.’ ” Critical Quarterly 2.2 (Summer 1960): 112-17. Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz. Vol. 58. Detroit: Gale, 1990. 170-72.
Epstein, E.L. Significant Motifs in Lord of the Flies. New York City: The Putnam Publishing Group, 1954
Golding, William. Lord of the Flies. New York City: The Berkely Publishing Group, 1954. Print.
Michel-Michot, Paulette. “The Myth of Innocence.” Revue des langues vivantes 28.4 (1962): 510-20. Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz. Vol. 58. Detroit: Gale, 1990. 175-77

Open Document