Lobbying Pros And Cons

506 Words2 Pages

Lobbying plays an important role in our democratic political practice. Government decisions affect many things such as people and organizations, and information must be given in order to produce educated decisions. In this writing assignment, I will be explaining the pros and cons of lobbying.
1. A.) The overall image of lobbyists to the Americans is not positive. One of the reasons Americans has such a negative outlook on lobbying is because it can affect elections. Large lobbyist groups can have significant economic resources that can influence close elections. Even if the instant involvement to a candidate is limited, lobbyists can use their assets to campaign on behalf of a candidate. But one of the most common complaints of opponents of …show more content…

A.) One way lobbyists appear to be a positive force in working for the public in our democracy is that they organize public concerns. Although many lobbyists work to convince legislators, some lobbyists have some type of public communication. The second way they are beneficial to the public is that they give citizens an opinion. It is a preconceived notion that lobbyists only work for corporations that are big and powerful. Many lobbyists serve minority interest groups.
B.) As stated in the case study, lobbyists provide the elected representatives with information. Lobbyists spend lots of time learning the pros and cons of subjects, using their knowledge to educate lawmakers. Another reason why they are helpful to our officials is that lobbyist sometimes helps whip bills.
C.) There a couple of ways that they could be harmful to the public and the elected officials. One way they are harmful to the public is that due to their close relationships with lawmakers, they have a more powerful influence than the American public and are able to convince the legislators to change his/her mind on certain topics. They are harmful to the elected officials because lobbyists often are working against one another. In those instances, the benefit goes to the lobbyist who is defending the current situation position, and stopping policy change from occurring is one area in which lobbying has demonstrated very

Open Document