Literary Analysis Of William Butler Yeats's No Second Troy

931 Words2 Pages

On the surface, William Butler Yeats’s poem No Second Troy, tells the narrative of a man questioning his unrequited loves morality and ideology. However, further reading of the poem gives the reader insight into Yeats’s own feelings towards Irish radical, Maud Gonne, a woman to whom he proposed on numerous occasions unsuccessfully. Gonne had always been more radical than Yeats within her efforts to secure Ireland’s independence from Britain in the first decades of the 20th century, but Yeats persisted in receiving her love, dedicating many of his poems to her, thus showing his obsession to the radical actress. The poem can be split into four rhetorical questions; first the speaker asks “why” he should blame her, for his own unhappiness; next he questions “what” else she could have done with her “noble” mind; following this, the speaker, seemingly speaking to himself, accepts that she is who she is and that cannot be changed, lastly the speaker questions whether there is anything else that could have been an outlet for her “fiery” temperament.

Initially, the poem can be viewed as a sonnet, however, true sonnets contain fourteen lines, in contrast to No Second Troy’s twelve, thus making it a douzaine. Like a sonnet, the rhyme scheme can divide the poem into three quatrains, with the lack of last rhyming couplet accounting for the lack of the last two lines. This coupled with a loose iambic pentameter gives the poem a controversial tone throughout, as it does not follow conventional ‘Love’ poem tradition. This
Within No Second Troy, the use of rhetorical questions gives the effect of a soliloquy or a monologue, of a man talking to himself in an informal way, shown by the use of enjambment. The questions also act as a tool to present confusion within the speaker.
“Why should I blame her that she filled my

Open Document