Lille Tissages, S. A.
Background
Lille Tissages, S.A. was one of the largest companies in the textile industry located in Lille, France.
Its 2003 sales had exceeded FF96 million out of which 2.6% was for item 345. Item 345 was one of the most successful products. In its prime years from 1998 – 2001 they had a market share for Item 345 of 35%. In 2002 the market share dropped to 30%, and then continued to drop in 2003 to 20%. See exhibit 1. This is believed to have been caused by Lille Tissages, S.A. raising the price of Item 345 from FF15.00/m to FF20.00/m in 2002, while the competitors kept their price atFF15.00/m.
The reason for raising the price in 2002 was the need to bring the profit per meter up to that of other items on the line. Although the company was in a strong position financially, it would require considerable capital in the next few years to finance a recently approved long-term modernization and expansion program.1
Facing stiff competition the senior management needed to reconsider the pricing plan for Item 345. So in early 2004 they held a meeting to decide in which direction to go.
A reasonable forecast of industry volume for 2004 was 700,000 meters.
The sales director proposed that if the firm were to reduce the price of Item 345 to FF15.00/m, they would be able to increase sales to 175,000 units (or 25% of industry volume). But if they were to keep the price at the current value of FF20.00/m, they would be able to sell not less than 75,000 units (or 11% of industry volume).
Questions
1. Should Lille Tissages, S.A. lower the price to FF15.00/m? (Assume no
intermediate prices are being considered.)
2. If the department that produces Item 345 was a profit center and if you were
the manager of that department, would it be to your financial advantage to
lower the price?
3. Is there any possibility that competition might raise their prices if Lille
Tissages, S.A. maintains its price of FF20.00/m? If so, how do you take this
fact into your analysis?
4. At FF15.00, will Lille Tissages, S.A. earn a profit on item 345? How do you
decide?
Question 1
Should Lille Tissages, S.A. lower the price to FF15.00/m? (Assume no intermediate prices are being considered.)
To determine if Lille Tissages, S.A. should lower the price to FF15.00/m or not we need to consider the Variable costs and the Contribution margin associated with Item 345.
Variable costs: “Variable costs are costs that vary with the volume of activity”2 and they are: direct labor, Materials, Material spoilage & direct department expenses.
Moncrief Company agreed to pay Jim Lester 20% of the gross profit made from the 2013 sales of the Zelenex. Between January 1, 2013 and December 28, 2013, Moncrief’s total available units for sale were, 50,000 units of Zelenex for $30.00 per unit ($1,500,000). Also in addition to the former activities, Moncrief sold 35,000 units for $60.00 per unit ($2,100,000). Moncrief Company uses periodic LIFO inventory method as a result, Jim Lester was to receive $210,000. (Textbook pg.469)
Fixed expenses are those that will be there everyday the lodge is open regardless of the number of skiers. The Lodge is open 200 days per year and the cost of running the new lift is $500 per day for the entire 200 days giving us $100,000 in fixed costs. Variable costs are the expenses based on the number of customers. There is an additional $5 expense per skier per day associated with the new lift. If there are 300 skiers multiplied by $5 each multiplied by the 40 days that they are expected to be on the lift, we will have $60,000 in variable expenses.
average price. In long term this will not be the case since the operating costs will
We have cumulated a profit of $206 million over this period, second of the industry. Our goal of escalating profit has advised us to increase automation level and for cutting costs, which enabled us to have the margins of all products above 30% in 2019 and an average margin of 53.4% in 2024. Additionally, we invested to keep our products updated to the market trend with an attention to customer buying criteria. Moreover, starting from recent years, we run our full capacity with second shifts whenever the market need has a possibility to accommodate our production. To achieve a greater profit, we based our pricing strategy on the market movements in general by decreasing our price by $0.50 every year except for our Low End product-Acre.
1.To increase prices according to 4th scenario (total line price increase by 5%) and from short-term revenues income use resources for advertising.
b. The amount of molasses and byproduct shipped to seven customers (a majority of which are internal and therefore don't generate profit accounted for in this model).
Their price must be one that is attainable and reasonable for the offerings. The Kotler & Keller text suggests that facilities analyze competitors and their offerings, estimate their own costs, and determine demand, in order to set the appropriate price.
This is the price that the CEO of Anderson Coffee, had set as the lowest amount we would accept an offer for from Statler Hotel. Problems, Conflict Strategies & Planning 1. A potential problem, in this case, is if Statler is not willing to budge on our reservation point of $3.15/lb. Statler's reservation point may be below our reservation point, and we will be in a negative bargaining range. This negative bargaining range may lead to an impasse in the negotiation.
As we learned from Chapter 12, price must be carefully determined and match with firm’s product, distribution, and communication strategies. (Hutt & Speh, 2012, p. 300) Therefore, there should be a strong market perspective in pricing. In order to build an effective pricing policy, marketers should focus on the value a customer places on a product or service. One of the most effective ways to do so is differentiating through value creation.
Price increases in the raw material mean that prices needed to be increased, but customers were still willing to pay for a quality product.
Atlantic Computer is a large manufacturer of servers and other high-tech products. They are known for providing premium high end servers. Atlantic Computer’s is in the process of introducing Tronn, a new basic server, which includes Performance Enhancing Server Accelerator (PESA) software. This software will allow Tronn to perform up to four times faster than its standard speed. Therefore these two new products were specifically designed to sell as a bundle or “Atlantic Bundle.” Jason Jowers, fresh off of his MBA degree is responsible for developing the pricing strategy for the “Atlantic Bundle. After much research Jowers narrowed down to four different routes on how the bundle can be priced: status quo, competitive, cost-plus, or value-in.
Regarding the markup price, the top management is not allowing to go below 33.3%. Though some of the other options to be consider like on basis of past good relations with Konig explain them the benefits of high quality regardless the price, other options to be consider for future if bid is not gained etc. Such options are tested against the production, its cost, benefits to new projects.
The product will have an introductory price of $xx wholesale/ $4 retail price (24 RMB). For the second year we expect to lower the price by acquiring local suppliers and expanding our product line. We hope to reflect the impact of the strategy by acquiring market share from other companies with other alternatives.
The pricing strategy will start out rather high for this product upon its release in order to draw a more selective crowd such as the upper class members of the urban society. Once the product has succeeded within this market there will be a development of additional variations of the product which will allow for certain models, with less features, to be sold at a lower price point in order to attract the members of society who are less willing to pay the high asking price for the top of the line version of the
All items are hand-picked and have been established for 3 years. Mr Price will need to combat this threat by closing the gap where potential customers are escaping by merging businesses, or creating a competitive advantage. A competitive advantage is achieved by having lower prices, better quality, customer’s loyalty or best service. (Retief, 2015)