Libels Vs Slander In Criminal Law

“A person is liable for slander if that person intentionally says that someone is a thief when she knows it is not true” is a matter that comes under the states’ own constitutions and the law procedure for this slander differs from state to state. Every state has its own discretion as to what is libel or slander, and therefore, every state has its own jurisdiction in the matter. Some states keep both the libels and slanders under the same law books and prosecute according to the criminal law. However, some states have altogether different laws for the two matters and perform its jurisdiction accordingly. The law comes under the states’ list of law matters and therefore, the federal system does not deal with slanders, libels and defamations,

If a written contract is in place for a real estate deal, then both the federation and the state jurisdiction are responsible for protecting the rights of the petitioner and giving a judgement in light of justice. However, some states even allow an oral contract to be in place for real estate deals. Most of the states do not find it to be an appropriate ground for issuing a decision on the matter. What is to be observed here is that oral contracts are not enforceable and even though they can be recognized by both the parties as well as a few states, it is unenforceable under law. So, for a contract for real estate buying and selling should be in written format to be enforceable under the law of the

The Bill of Rights in the constitution of the USA clearly defines that no person should be discriminated on the basis of aforementioned reasons. If any violation of the law is observed, then it becomes the duty of the federal administration and jurisdiction to protect the constitutional right of the individual. In this case, even if the state wants, it cannot provide protection or exception to the discriminator. Therefore, any constitutional right comes under the federal