Law of Evidence: R v Kearley

2110 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The rule against hearsay evidence

Law of Evidence: R v Kearley

Essentially this piece concerns whether the House of Lords correctly

decided the case of R v Kearley[1]. The majority decided allowing the

appeal, that the evidence concerned in this case was either

irrelevant, and therefore inadmissible (unless part of the res gestae)

or was inadmissible as hearsay in the form of an implied assertion.

The facts of Kearley will be discussed, followed by an analysis of the

decision by their Lordships, finally considering the issues of

relevance and implied assertions in relation to the decision in

Kearley.

The facts of Kearley are well known. The disputed evidence was that

the police officers whilst on the raid answered a number of callers to

the flats, both by telephone and by visitors. The police officers

testified that the callers were seeking to buy drugs in place of the

original callers who were unwilling or unable to attend court. The

appellant objected to the evidence on the ground that it was hearsay,

but this was overruled. The Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal and

certified a question to the House of Lords.

Condensing the certified question, it was whether a person not called

as a witness, for the purpose of not establishing the truth of any

fact narrated by the words, but of inviting the jury to draw an

inference from the fact that the words were spoken ? [2]

On the issue of relevancy, Lord Ackner for the majority considered

that each request was evidence of the state of mind of the person

making the request, and that was an irrelevant issue in the trial.

This was backed up by Lords Bridge and Oliver. It should be noted

though that Lord Bridge f...

... middle of paper ...

...[1986] 86 Cr App R 105

[15] DPP v Kilbourne [1973] AC 726 per Lord Simon at P756

[16] [1993] 13 Legal Studies 54, 65

[17] Law of Evidence (1999) Page 528

[18] [1993] 56 MLR 138, 146

[19] Per Lord Griffiths in Kearley at Page 348

[20] [1993] CLJ 40, 41

[21] ibid no. 19

[22] The Modern Law of Evidence (4th Edition) (Butterworths)

[23] Wright v Doe D Tatham (1837) and Teper v R (1952)

[24] [1993] 13 Legal Studies 54 59

[25] [1993] 56 MLR 138, 140

[26] Law of Evidence (1999)

[27] [1992] NLJ 1194, 1194

[28] [1993] 56 MLR 138, 148

[29] [1993] 56 MLR 138, 151-152

[30] [1994] 110 LQR 431, 438

[31] Report No. 245: Evidence in Criminal Proceedings and Related

Topics (1997)

[32] Pattenden, Rein - (modified version though), and Cross

[33] [1993] CLJ 40, 42

Show More
Related

  • R V Ewanchuck Case Study

    1964 Words  | 4 Pages

    Since the second wave of feminism in the 1960’s women have demanded for equality rights. The R V. Ewanchuck case created many disagreement’s with feminists on the topic of rape myths. It has not only been seen as a precedent for the criminal law but as well an eye opener for the society to create awareness for this act. Since society continues to support most rape myths, it overlooks the act itself and puts the blame and responsibility on the victim as opposed to the perpetrator. This has created a rape culture within society. The term rape culture was created to demonstrate the ways in which victims were blamed for sexual assault, and how male sexual violence was normalized. Feminists are exploring the world of rape myths in Canadian law

    Read More

  • What Is The Case Of Kenneth Dascoli's Court Case

    1772 Words  | 4 Pages

    Judge Fahey felt that affidavits provided by Dascoli’s mother and ex- girlfriend in support of Dascoli were weak and insubstantial, as well as not credible given the fact the defendant had the opportunity to advise Kelly of first aggressor evidence failed to do so. Additionally, in reference to an affidavit written by a medical expert, Fahey states that his conclusion was “without sufficient factual basis, and is, at best, conjecture and

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Judge Richard Ross

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    Returning to the judicial world of the Bronx Family Court as a judge, after years of working in administration, Judge Richard Ross is astonished to find a distinctly more disjointed situation than the one he left. As he attempts to live out his life as “both the fact finder and arbiter of the law” it is clear the current judicial system does not serve him well (xv). Judge Ross conveys to the reader the fundamental issues of the Family Court system through his day to day happenings which range from endless caseloads to death threats. The use of personal experience is effective in adding credibility to more clearly convey his point that not only the Judges, but the case workers, 18-B attorneys, and various legal aides are overworked to a point

    Read More

  • False Confessions and the Norfolk Four Case

    2738 Words  | 6 Pages

    Kassin, Saul, and Lawrence Wrightsman (Eds.). The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure. Chapter 3. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1985. Print.

    Read More

  • Case Analysis of US v. Emerson

    2875 Words  | 6 Pages

    This case deals with the Defendant's possession of a firearm while under a restraining order, and the charges incurred by the Defendant for such firearm possession. Under Texas law, the possession of a firearm by Mr. Emerson creates a perceivable threat to members of his family, thus creating a violation of the restraining order against him. Apparently common practice in Texas, the restraining order was filed by Mr. Emerson's wife in conjunction with the papers filed for divorce. The restraining order sought to enjoin Emerson from "engaging in various financial transactions to maintain the financial status quo and from making threatening communications or actual attacks upon his wife during the pendency of the divorce proceedings" (United 1). Under Texas law, unbeknownst to Mr. Emerson, the possession of a firearm during the time period of the restraining order constituted a direct violation of the restraining order, and Mr. Emerson was indicted on charges of such violation.

    Read More

  • Penry V. Lynaugh Case Study

    393 Words  | 1 Pages

    These decisions led to a partial striking down of Texas’s capital punishment statute in 1989. The Supreme Court held that the question of whether a defendant would be a “future danger” to the community did not adequately allow for consideration of the defendant’s mental retardation as a possible mitigating factor. (Penry v. Lynaugh). Some jurors might believe that a defendant like Johnny Penry with a low IQ might be more likely to commit future crimes, perhaps because he could not learn from his mistakes or be deterred by the law. That ruling forced Texas to change the way juries were instructed in death penalty cases. Juries needed to understand that a person’s mental retardation should at least be considered as reason for giving him a life sentence.

    Read More

  • The Criminal Justice System: Brandley V. Keeshan

    772 Words  | 2 Pages

    As a result of the discrimination within the criminal justice system traffic stops are composed of mainly African American and Hispanics. These minorities are targeted within the streets as criminals by police officers. A video from The Orland Sentinel showed major evidence of racial profiling by police. Within the video there more than one thousand people’s roadside stops shown. With watching one hundred and forty-eight hours of video, statistics acquired were that “Almost 70 percent of the motorists stopped were black or Hispanic. More than 80 percent of the cars that were searched were driven by blacks and Hispanics. Although deputies contend they stop cars only for legitimate traffic violations - as required by the Florida Supreme Court

    Read More

  • Parol Evidence Rule Essay

    352 Words  | 1 Pages

    One-Year provision. The statute of frauds requires that all the contracts that cannot be performed within one year of the making of the contract be in writing or in proper electronic form. In this case, it is impossible to grow five crops of potatoes, and wait until they are mature in Idaho within a year. Therefore, this oral contract is unenforceable, but if Blair can do it within a year, then the contract is enforceable.

    Read More

  • Final Exam: Two Courtroom Cases

    1449 Words  | 3 Pages

    Dan Locallo is a very contradicting man. When he began his career as a prosecutor he was anything but polite to the defense lawyers. Locallo himself describes himself as “kind of an asshole” towards defense lawyers (Courtroom 302, 59). During his time as a prosecutor, Dan Locallo became intrigued by the opportunity to become a judge. When Steve Bogira asked Locallo why he wanted to become a judge, his reply seemed simple. Locallo claimed that he never wanted to become a judge because of a “power-trip” he does claim that “the power of attraction was a great influence” (Courtroom 302, 59). However, Locallo admits that the real reason why he wanted to become a judge was because he would have the “ability to make decisions, to do justice” (Courtroom 302, 59). As a judge, Locallo seems to express three different personalities, which tend to change depending on the current case at hand. His personalities are being compassionate judge, being an understanding judge, or being a hard-nose tough judge. Each of these personalities are not only determined by the case, but also by whether Locallo will profit on the long run; whether or not he will get reelected as a circuit judge at the end of his term.

    Read More

  • The Issue of Pretrial Publicity

    1935 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...T. M. (1997). Can the jury disregard that information? The use of suspicion to reduce the prejudicial effects of retrial publicity and inadmissible testimony. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(11), 1215-1226.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Visual Evidence

    1059 Words  | 3 Pages

    4). This is written in a negative tone implying that a change needed to happen in order for them to be more successful; this change being an increase in visual evidence. Expressing a very similar opinion is Michael Diamant, a business attorney. He states the following, “What I’m trying to do with the jury is to focus the issue so they can understand [it] in a clear graphic way, and take away all the noise around it” (INSERT, 2012, para. 6). This will allow the jury to focus solely on what’s important, influencing their decision in the way that the lawyers want it to. Speaking on the contrary to his previous statement, Carney argues, “Lawyers can get overenthusiastic about creating visuals. They forget they have to be directly connected to the evidence.” He then explains that the jury will get tired of it. The jury wants to be engaged and informed. This requires a balance between visual evidence and non-visual evidence. To put the summary of this article into perspective, it’s easy to use an example: the murder case of Susan Wright. Visual evidence will surely help the jury understand the actions that took place on the night of the murder. But what’s important and what’s superfluous? Some important visual evidence for the jury to see

    Read More

  • House V Bell Case Study

    1824 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court used this evidence, and the fact that the pants and the blood had been transported to the crime lab in the same box, and that a vial and a quarter of autopsy blood were missing, to rule that, if known by the jury, could have created reasonable doubt (House V. Bell, 2006). This, along with the evidence, presented by House, that Mr. Muncey had a history of spousal abuse against Mrs. Muncey, and the fact that he had fabricated an alibi to cover his whereabouts for the time of the murder, could have created a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury, had it been presented at trial (House v. Bell, 2006). It was with these facts in mind that the Supreme Court reached a final ruling in this case. The Court’s final ruling was that while House had not presented sufficient evidence to exonerate himself completely, he did present enough evidence to create the question of his actual guilt, and warranted a new trial (House v. Bell, 2006).

    Read More

  • Forensic Evidence Essay

    1204 Words  | 3 Pages

    Evidence collection is a crucial part of forensics. Its reliability can be compromised by input bias from law

    Read More

  • Forensic Evidence Admissibility For or Against in the Bloodsworth v. State Case

    1944 Words  | 4 Pages

    On Bloodsworth’s appeal he argued several points. First he argued that there was not sufficient evidence to tie Bloodsworth to the crime. The courts ruled that the ruling stand on the grounds that the witness evidence was enough for reasonable doubt that the c...

    Read More

  • The Problems Created by the Doctrine of Judicial Precedent

    1530 Words  | 4 Pages

    Introduction This submission will discuss the problems created by the Doctrine of Judicial Precedent and will attempt to find solutions to them. Whereas, English Law has formed over some 900 years it was not until the middle of the 19th Century that the modern Doctrine was ‘reaffirmed’. London Tramways Co. Ltd V London County Council (1898). Law is open to interpretation, all decisions made since the birth of the English Legal System, have had some form of impact whether it is beneficial or not The term ‘Judicial Precedent’ has at least two meanings, one of which is the process where Judges will follow the decisions of previously decided cases, the other is what is known as an ‘Original Precedent’ that is a case that creates and applies a new rule. Precedents are to be found in Law Reports and are divided up into ‘Binding’ and ‘Persuasive’.

    Read More

More about Law of Evidence: R v Kearley

Open Document