Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arthurian legend essays
King arthur's myths and legends
Essay about arthurian legends
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
At first glance, Sir Thomas Malory's Le Morte D'Arthur is a story of a kingdom falling into destruction. However, Malory continually highlights the exploits of Sir Launcelot, a man in an adulterous relationship. Though flawed, Launcelot becomes a hero, because in the end, he is both the “flower of knights” (Malory 6.4; vol. 1) and a “good man” (Malory 15.6; vol. 2) – the title Launcelot aspires to over the course of Malory’s text. Throughout Le Morte D’Arthur, Launcelot attempts to hold to Christian values, but is brought down by his affair with Queen Guenever. While on the Quest of the Sangreal, Launcelot is not able to achieve the Sangreal, because “his privy thoughts [had been] set inwardly to the queen” (18.1; vol. 2). Even though he is allowed to see the Sangreal, Launcelot does not let go of his sin. He fails. …show more content…
11.40). A number of figures in the Bible were flawed in some way. They were not meant to be celebrated for their perfection, but for their ability to overcome sin. Likewise, Launcelot continues to try to live a moral life. In spite of his shortcomings, Launcelot is expected to obey the Pentecostal Oath. For Launcelot, the oath is problematic because the second mandate is “always to flee treason” (Malory 3.15; vol. 1). Launcelot is in a relationship with King Arthur's wife, and as a result, he is betraying the kingdom he strives to protect. Launcelot's wrongdoing creates a parallel between the Arthur’s kingdom and the kingdom of God. His failing as a knight (treason) corresponds with his failing as a Christian
Loyalty is what the the knights demonstrated to their king by being willing to go to battle for him and die protecting his kingdom. The knights are ready to drop everything and go to fight someone they’ve never met, the second King Arthur tells them to. This loyalty is so extreme and powerful, that Lancelot refuses to fight Arthur even after King Arthur Invaded his lands, he chose to wait until he could claim self defense in order to keep his honor as a knight intact. Launcelot is a perfect example of extreme loyalty, because he does not allow his love life to get in the way of the loyalty he has towards his King. This balance that Launcelot has between his love life and loyalty to the King is why Launcelot has the greatest reputation
In the beginning of Le Morte d’Arthur, background information is given. The background information explains that Sir Lancelot (King Arthur's favorite knight), has fallen in Queen Gwynevere. (King Arthur's wife) Once Sir Lancelot confessed his love to Gwynevere, she revealed that she was also in love with him and the two began a passionate love affair that lasted two years without King Arthur knowing. Sir Lancelot definitely has broken the code of chivalry because his duty was to protect the King and Queen as their knight however, he has disrespected him by having an affair with Gwynevere. It was Sir Lancelot’s affair that led to the following, events that then led to King Arthur’s death. A knight’s duty is to honor the King, not to disrespect him and have an affair with his wife without him knowing. Additionally, Sir Lancelot wasn't sentenced to death by the King but the Queen was sentenced to be burned at the stake. This goes to also show the corruption of Britain's Society. If another pilgrim within a lower class would have done what Sir Lancelot did, he would have been sentenced to death. Both the Queen and Lancelot contributed to their affair which brings up the question of, why should the Queen be burned at the stake and not
T.H. White is directly referenced within the film and Malory’s idealization of the glory of chivalry can once again be seen. In my essay, I will show how chivalry is used in all the texts above as a bonding agent between all Arthurian knights. As Arthur’s knights honor and respect chivalry they remain as one cohesive group, but once they begin to abandon chivalry the Round Table begins to crumble and chaos ensues. Annotated Bibliography Sprague, Kurth “Conclusion.” Arthuriana 16.3 (2006): 129-152.
The evolution of human society consists mainly of ineffective ruling regimes and oppressed peasants. Medieval Europe falls into this same pervasive cycle. Social and political hierarchies intertwine which creates a grossly inefficient system. Hereditary lineage determines nobility. Commoners possess no hope of social mobility. Every aspect of life is virtually preordained. These circumstances revolve around the figure Lanval by Mari de France. Mari de France introduces Lanval as a courteous and distinguished knight of King Arthur’s court. Lanval possesses the most moral nature of all of King Arthur’s knights, yet even so, the other knights of King Arthur’s round table despise him. The many knights neglect acknowledgment of his nature as does
One of the most enduring myths in the Western world is that of Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table. Regardless of the origins of the tales, the fact is that by the time they had been filtered through a French sensibility and re-exported to England, they were representations of not one but several ideals. Courtly love and chivalry and the various components thereof, such as martial prowess, chastity, bravery, courtesy, and so on, were presented as the chief virtues to aspire to, and the knights as role models. Arthur's eventual fall is precisely because of having failed at some level to fulfill these ideals in his life.
The Arthurian legends of Iwein and Gawain and the Green Knight are two examples of the medieval initiation story: a tale in which a character, usually in puberty or young adulthood, leaves home to seek adventures and, in the process, maturity. Through the course of their adventures, including a meeting with the man of the wilderness, temptations at the hands of women, and a permanent physical or mental wounding, the character grows from adolescent awkwardness and foolishness to the full potential knightly honor. While both Arthurian legends fit this format, the depth of character development, specifically in terms of relationships, is vastly different. Whereas Gawain and the Green Knight does little more with relationships than demonstrate the evils of female temptations, Iwein effectively explores the formation, destruction, and resurrection of numerous male and female relationships.
Remember that you are the greatest knight living and that many important matters at this court lie in your hands. It is well known that women are inherently changeable, and often repent of their anger. Therefore I suggest that you ride no farther than the hermitage at Wyndesore, where the good hermit Sir Brastius will care for you, and wait there until we have better tidings for you. Because of Gwynevere's foolish pride, she cannot forgive Launcelot for having to be with other women to avert the attention from his relationship with her.The seven deadly sins can ruin one's life, as it did many characters in Le Morte D'Arthur. The sins are in place to warn people of their outcome, and yet still they commit them. The seven deadly sins may not lead to immediate death, but have definite malevolent products that should be taken into account by all.
Of special interest to me on this piece by Marie de France are its vivid similarities to the romance and adventure novels I loved to read as a young adult. Therefore, other than the kingdom setting, I truly enjoyed this Anglo-Norman literature. Marie de France included all of the ingredients for a modern-day romance narration, except the period is medieval and not twenty-first century. The struggles within and the finish of the story fully evolve around the romantic love between Lanval and his magical mistress. Like a present-day love story, the narrative contained references to exquisite physical beauty, bravery, mystery, wealth, erotic liaisons, and fantasy.
To begin with, Launcelot withheld self-control when he was confronted with certain situations. Toward the beginning of the tale Launcelot was sleeping beneath an apple tree when four queens enchanted
Similar to the destruction of friendship and loyalty, the lack of responsibility leads to careless and dull actions performed towards others. Before sleeping with Guinevere, Lancelot slept with a princess named Elaine, with whom he had a child named Galahad. After sleeping with the love of his life, Guinevere, Lancelot feels unmotivated to take care of Galahad; Lancelot even hides from Elaine and Galahad when they come to visit him at King Arthur’s court, Camelot: “"Lancelot," she said, "I think you ought to go to your son. Elaine is grieving because you have not been to see him" (392). Lancelot acts careless about helping raise his Galahad, so he hides from his wife and son when they arrive. Guinevere is forced to go chase after Lancelot and order him to go to his son at once. However, Lancelot’s attitude that he does not love Elaine and does not want to participate in raising Galahad results in the tragedies of Elaine’s suicide and Galahad becoming a better knight that Lancelot: “Right so Sir Launcelot, his father, dressed his speak and brake it upon Sir Galahad, and Galahad smote him so again that he smote down horse and man. And then he drew his sword, and dressed him unto Sir Percivale, and smote him so on the helm…” (Malory 362). Lancelot, not recognizing Galahad who is dressed as a beggar, unjustifiably attempts to strike Galahad. Galahad, proving he is the better knight, hits Lancelot down with his bear hands while afterwards using his sword to strike down upon Sir Percivale, a friend of Lancelot. Galahad not only found the Holy Grail over all other knights of Arthur’s Round Table, but Galahad is able to defeat Lancelot and Sir Percivale in a battle. Lancelot’s affair leads to his sinful behavior, which in turns results in him being succeeded by his son, whom is a far greater knight than
Marie De France’s Lanval is a remarkable short narrative that engages the reader into a world filled with unrealistic elements, but enhances on the true meaning of romance, chivalry and nature during the years that King Arthur reigned. “Sir Gawain and The Green Knight” unfortunately does not have an author that can be recognized but this epic poem demonstrates the ghastly adventure of a knight who decides to defend the honor of young King Arthur against a supernatural being in this malicious game of cat and mouse. Both of these pieces of literature have enchanting characteristics that define them as a masterpiece of their era and that’s why they both are easily compared and contrasted. In addition, both Lanval and “Sir Gawain and The Green Knight” can be classified as similar through their themes, style and plots, although they are different through their language and diction. Even though both of these literatures can be viewed as similar as well as contrasting, in the end, each of these tales have illuminated the realm of fantasy throughout the court of King Arthur.
The tales of King Arthur and many of their numerous characters are well known in literature. The Arthurian world is one of the great myths of modern times. Those great pieces of literature have many common themes, one of them being courtly love “L’amour Courtois”. This paper talks of courtly love as seen in King Arthur’s world especially examining “Yvain or the Knight with the Lion” and “Lancelot: or the Knight of the Cart”. Furthermore, one of the goals is to show how that courtly love could be seen in today in our world.
When Maurice Keen set out to write a book on the components and development of chivalry, he did not know it would be “the last word on a seductive subject,” as stated by one Washington Post reviewer. Instead, Keen was merely satisfying a curiosity that derived from a childhood fascination of stories filled with “knights in shining armour.” This juvenile captivation was then transformed into a serious scholarly interest by Keen’s teachers, the product of which is a work based upon literary, artifactual, and academic evidence. Keen’s Chivalry strives to prove that chivalry existed not as a fantastical distraction, as erroneously portrayed by romances, but instead as an integral and functional feature of medieval politics, religion, and society. The thirteen chapters use an exposition format to quietly champion Keen’s opinion of chivalry as being an element of an essentially secular code of “honour” derived from military practices.
Lancelot, the knight of the cart, is in love with Queen Guinevere, who constantly compromises his reputation by embarrassing him . Chretien de Troyes writes Lancelot in The Knight of the Cart to be deeply in love, so much so that he constantly sacrifices his reputation for the queen. Classically, “the romantic hero developed from an extravagant to an ideal character” (Williams 275) in typical Romance literature. Although Romance literature has many variations, Lancelot portrays this transition from the extravagant, noble, knight to an ideal character in the tale. Lancelot depicts what is ideal for what a woman would want, and this in turn does ennoble him. Lancelot is ennobled by courtly love, but unintentionally. By placing himself above rumor and concern for his reputation, he emerges as a modern ennobled knight even though his love generates embarrassing consequences superficially.
Sir Malory once again makes us ponder whether this could be true after we witness Lancelot’s actions in “Morte D’Arthur”. Sir Lancelot’s heroism and constant response to King Arthur’s call of duty show us that he is chivalrous. However, once Sir Lancelot “slew Sir Agravain, and after twelve of his fellows” his chivalry was stained (p 444). The controversy of Lancelot’s chivalry is inflamed when his “love for Guinevere drives him into battle” and causes the “deaths of Sir Gareth and Sir Gaheris” (Harrington 67). Is the killing of several people justified by one act of chivalry? Sir Lancelot essentially “modifies his points of honor” in order to justify his actions.(Harrington 69) Sir Lancelot’s need to modify his code of honor in order to escape a predicament let us know that his character is at times