More handpicked essays just for you.
Character development in Shakespeare
Characters And Characterization In Shakespeares Works
Character development in Shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Throughout Nora’s various interactions with Krogstad concerning her debt and his blackmail to keep his job, their conversation at the end of Act Two reveals both Nora’s complete love for her husband and Krogstad’s motivations behind his supposed immoral nature, interestingly presenting Krogstad as a potential foil for Nora. Earlier in Act One, Torvald reveals that Krogstad once committed forgery, and through his “sharp practices,” he caused everyone to look down at his “moral breakdown,” depicting the reasoning behind various character assumptions of Krogstad’s despicable nature (70). While the revelation illustrates the surface interpretation of Krogstad’s character, it also mirrors Nora’s actions in that she attempts to avoid conviction …show more content…
With his question, Krogstad illustrates his more humane characteristics by recognizing human emotion, portraying him with more than simply a base desire for societal destruction, unlike what many other characters believe. Additionally, Krogstad underscores that, while his actions remain immoral, neither Nora nor Torvald “think of [Krogstad’s children],” before Torvald gave him his notice, implying that he possesses at least a partially selfless motivation to keep his job (86). As Krogstad considers more than himself in his negotiations, the play illustrates that his nature remains inherently complex, steadily moving him away from the role of a static antagonist. Furthermore, Krogstad conveys that he “want[s] to recoup” rather than receive any monetary compensation, indicating that he dedicated the previous “year and a half” to heighten his social status in the community …show more content…
This primarily highlights Nora’s all-encompassing love for Torvald that allows her to believe in him despite his subtle flaws, underscoring the irony of her viewpoint as Torvald utterly fails to act selflessly in the end of the play. Moreover, Nora emphasizes to Krogstad that “[he’ll] see, [he’ll] see,” depicting her trust in her husband to stand resolute against Krogstad’s threat (88). From this, Nora’s belief only further promotes the irony of the situation, as Torvald quickly succumbs to selfish desires and immediately sacrifices Nora instead of himself when presented with Krogstad’s demands. With the entire conversation highlighting Krogstad’s complex character and Nora’s blind faith, the play portrays Krogstad as a potential foil for Nora, as both committed the crime of forgery, and Krogstad depicts Nora’s possible future where she, due to her crime and disillusionment with her husband, now looks down upon those who act like
When Krogstad confronts Nora about her forgery, he tells her, “Now listen to me, Mrs. Helmer. If necessary, I’ll fight for my job in the bank as if it were for life itself” (Ibsen 2200). Krogstad understands the noble reason behind Nora’s crime,exploiting Nora’s secret trying to fix his reputation and get a well-paying job. This demonstrates the power that money and reputation have in society and how predatory people in society act to gain money and status. When Krogstad is laying out exactly what he wants in return for keeping Nora’s secret he asks her, “Are you forgetting that I’ll be in control then of your final reputation?” (Ibsen 2216). Krogstad, especially living with a tarnished reputation, knows the value of status within society. He is willing to threaten Nora’s reputation, and therefore the well-being of her entire family, to ensure the restoration of his status and employment , an act which asserts how predatory a member of society will act keep their honorable standing and keep out others that are not so highly
...order to commit senseless, hateful crimes, while Krogstad must assume a villainous role in order to save his family – an act of love. In summation, the antagonists and the affected relationships are nearly diametrically opposed, as are the respective means of marital destruction.
In the play, the audience sees it from Nora’s perspective. Nora is Torvald’s little squirrel, his little, insignificant squirrel. Nora is worthless to Torvald and she only realizes in the end how foolish she is to think that he will
Nora hides the fact that she has done something illegal from Torvald. She is given the opportunity to tell Torvald and maybe get his support or advise on the situation, and she lies to him to hide the truth. She claims that the reason that she does not want Torvald to fire Krogstad is that "this fellow writes in the most scurrilous newspapers...he can do [Torvald] an unspeakable amount of harm"(Ibsen 519). Nora hides the truth and replaces it with lies. Torvald does not know that if he fires Krogstad that the consequences will affect his whole family. Nora could have told him, but instead she decided to hide the truth from her husband.
Nora is the pampered wife of an aspiring bank manager Torvald Halmer. In a desperate attempt to saves her husband's life Nora once asked for a loan so she and her family could move somewhere where her husband could recover from his sickness. Giving the circumstances she, as a woman of that period, by herself and behind her husband forged her dad signature to receive the loan. Now, Nora's lender (Mr. Krogstad), despite her paying punctually, uses that fault as a fraud to pressure her so she could help him to keep his job in the Bank where her husband is going to be the manager. Nora finds out that Torvald would fire Mr. Krogstad at any cost. At learning this, Nora trembles for she knows Mr. Krogstad will tell everything to Torvald. She remains confident; however that Torvald will stand by her no matter what outcome. His reaction though is not what she expected and therefore here is when she realizes that she "must stand quite alone" and leaves her husband.
Krogstad is different from Torvald because he is not as well off economically and socially and this leads him to try an extremer form of manipulation. Krogstad is desperate to keep his job at the bank and tries to get Nora to secure the job with her husband through blackmail. Since he was once found to be forging documents, his reputation has been flaky, so in order to regain his reputation for his sons: "For their sake I must win back as much respect as I can in the town" (22), he needs to keep his job at the bank.
Although Krostad’s blackmail does not change Nora’s whimsical nature, it opens her eyes to her underappreciated potential. “I have been performing tricks for you, Torvald,” (Find a different quote perhaps?) she exclaims in her confrontation with Torvald. She realizes that she has been putting on a facade for him throughout their marriage. Acting like someone she is not in order to fill the role that her father, Torvald, and society expected her to have.
The woman in this play is a very happy mother, who does not objectify to be a stay home wife, her life is happy and although she was faced by many obstacles before, like incurring into debt to save her husband’s life, she is a happy woman as long as she possesses the love of her children and husband. Life for Nora seems as calm as it could possibly be, but soon after the promotion of her husband and the imminent consequences such promotion will bring to Krogstad, bring a new set of complication to her life. Soon her past mistakes come to haunt her. She committed forgery, by signing in place of her deceased father, which of course is taken as leverage by Krogstad, the owner of the note she signed, in order for him to conserve his
Nora is presented with many choices, one of them being the option to lie to her husband, Torvald, or not to lie. Most of these tiny, white lies include when Nora tells Torvald that she has not eaten macarons. She goes about her choice to lie in a way that she believes is rational. Nora also has the foresight to weigh her options. If she lies to Torvald, they will have a happy marriage, but if Nora deceives him, everything will crumble beneath her feet. Choosing the former, Nora lives in fear that Torvald will discover her, but is happy living in falsehood. Eventually it becomes normal for Nora to lie, almost like nothing is wrong. Although, deep down inside, Nora is hiding a greater secret from Torvald, underneath all the tiny white lies. This falsehood regards a large sum of money that she borrows to save her husband 's life. Nora has acquired a lump sum from Nils Krogstad, that she knows she does not have the means to pay back in full by his set deadline. Nora’s fear of Torvald finding out weighs heavily in her decision of how to go about breaking even with
...d children. The final mask of Krogstad that is seen is that of love and caring. In the end Kristine goes back to Krogstad stating that she always loved him and only left him because “I had a helpless mother and two small brothers. We couldn’t wait for you” (Ibsen, 1225). In the end it is Krogstad who has changed for the better, not Nora or Helmer. It is the very man that Torvald so easily condemned for his past mistakes.
Nora has been a doll all of her life, fortunately, she has an awakening that kindles her passion for freedom. Torvald restricts her freedom. Torvald adorns Nora to his wishes and desires and basically strips Nora of her identity. Nora wants a happy marriage; hence, she appeases Torvald. When she is being blackmailed, she believes that Torvald will be her savior. However, Torvald’s selfish reaction to the news is Nora’s auspicious awakening. She knows that her marriage is a sham and that she does not know who she is. Nora leaves Torvald so that she can have the liberty to gain knowledge of the world and herself. Nora’s awakening has provided her with the freedom to fulfill her life.
Nora engages in a mutually dependent game with Torvald in that she gains power in the relationship by being perceived as weak, yet paradoxically she has no real power or independence because she is a slave to the social construction of her gender. Her epiphany at the end at the play realises her and her marriage as a product of society, Nora comes to understand that she has been living with a constr...
When Krogstad makes his first entrance, the audience senses that he portends evil. Nora “starts” and “trembles” at his voice (Ibsen). Dr. Rank says that Krogstad “suffers from a diseased moral character” (Ibsen). Torvald says that Krogstad has been “persistently poisoning his own children with lies and dissimulation” (Ibsen). It is obvious that Nora and Krogstad have a secret, but uncomfortable, relationship. Nora becomes nervous when she sees him, but pretends that she does not know who he is when speaking to others. Krogstad works at the bank where Torvald has just been appointed as director. Krogstad senses that he will be dismissed when Torvald assumes the supervision of the place. Therefore, he comes to Nora asking her to u...
Nora is a dynamic character. When the play begins Nora is viewed and presented as a playful and carefree person. She seems to be more intent on shopping for frivolous things. But, as time goes on it becomes apparent that Nora actually has a certain amount of seriousness in her decisions and actions in dealing with the debt she incurred to save Torvald’s life. Nora’s openness in her friendship with Dr. Rank changes after he professes his affections toward her. Her restraint in dealing with him shows that Nora is a mature and intelligent woman. Nora shows courage, not seen previously, by manipulating her way around Krogstad and his threats to reveal her secret. After feeling betrayed by Torvald, Nora reveals that she is leaving him. Having
As the play goes on, Nora seems to transform from her delicate little character into something much more. At the end of act one, Krogstad goes to Nora for the recollection of the money she had borrowed from him. "You don?t mean that you will tell my husband that I owe you money?" (21). Since Nora was wrong in doing so socially, she could not tell Torvald or anyone else about her problem. Not only would that affect their social standard but also Torvald's ego, which inevitably would happen anyway. After Krogstad threatens to expose Nora for forging her father's signature, she realizes that no matter what she does Torvald was going to know the truth. The flaw with...