Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Identity narratives
Bulgakov’ Diaboliad details an increasingly outrageously comical tale regarding the absurdities Korotkov endures at the hands of the Soviet social and government system. Bulgakov utilizes the bumbling character of Korotkov to paint a satire of the Soviet political abuse of the common man. As Korotkov suffers constant abuses from the Soviet populace, his identity and self-worth is stripped from him and he is treated as a stranger to society. Thus, Diaboliad criticizes the ability for a government to establish one’ identity as a human being and satirizes the replaceability of human beings as cogs in the machine of society. At the story’s inception, Korotkov is described as a simple menial laborer content of his place in life. Korotkov “… worked …show more content…
Underwarr and his twin occupy a main portion of the story’s conflict as their dual appearances plague and undermine Korotkov’s sanity, however, Kortokov’s own doppelganger Kolobkov plays a central role in erasing his own identity in the eyes of society. When Korotkov has his documents stolen, everyone starts to mistaken him for a Mister Kolobkov, a seemingly dastardly womanizer with very abrupt moral standards. An old man mistakenly accuses him saying “You want to snatch the last crumbs from the hands of an old man, Mister Kolobkov? Well then… Take them, eat up. Let an old man, a non-Party member, a sympathizer, die from hunger … Let him, you say. That’s where his road leads, the old mongrel” (Bulgakov 34). Without any documents to prove his identity, Korotkov is subject to whatever opinions and prejudices people have against him. Absent a job and documents, Korotkov exists only as people perceive him and despite all of his protests he is attributed an identity that is not his own. He is replaced by this Koblokov becoming a criminal and is further marginalized by society, which desires to dispose of him and his undesirability. Just as the Underwarrs serve as a doppelganger that emphasizes a uniform replaceable identity in mechanical Soviet society, Korotkov and Kolobkov represent a doppelganger set that emphasizes the absence of true identity for the everyman in Soviet
The short story, “Ivan Fyodorovich Shponka and His Aunt”, explicates the life of a man named Ivan Fyodorovich Shponka. We see him briefly in his young years, followed by his life in the army, and his return to the farm where his strong characterized aunt resides. We can see immediately that this man lives in constant cleanliness and dutiful paranoia; these are some of his desires that he wishes to exhibit to others. We can also see his fears, which reside in the confiscation of his masculinity and independence. This short story has many elements that resemble others in the Nikolai Gogol collection.
Dostoyevsky's writing in this book is such that the characters and setting around the main subject, Raskolnikov, are used with powerful consequences. The setting is both symbolic and has a power that affects all whom reside there, most notably Raskolnikov. An effective Structure is also used to show changes to the plot's direction and Raskolnikov's character. To add to this, the author's word choice and imagery are often extremely descriptive, and enhance the impact at every stage of Raskolnikov's changing fortunes and character. All of these features aid in the portrayal of Raskolnikov's downfall and subsequent rise.
He was imprisoned for nearly a decade as punishment for making criticizing statements about Stalin in a letter to a friend. This motif of communist oppression is reflected both in the authors life and, his writings in One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich.
One day in the life of Ivan Denisovich . (n.d.). Retrieved may 10, 2011, from Gradesaver: http://www.gradesaver.com/one-day-in-the-life-of-ivan-denisovich/
To further transform the Soviet Union, state officials encouraged citizens to help improve the literacy rate and recognize the many heroes of the socialist state. These heroes, including Joseph Stalin, “received huge amounts of fan mail and were lionized on appearances throughout the country” (72). They also encouraged the remaking of individuals, particularly through work. Before the transformation, many did not enjoy working, but “under socialism, it was the thing that filled life with meaning” (75). Numerous interviews an author had with “transformed” felons, illustrated that even criminals could be transformed into good citizens through work (76). However, Sheila Fitzpatrick argues that these interviews were “clearly a propaganda project.”
Emphasized throughout Soviet Russia, ‘vertical collectivism,’ occurs when hierarchy defines one’s rank, and submission to authority comes at the cost of self-sacrifice. “Hundreds. Thousands. Millions. Millions of what? Stomachs, and heads, and legs, and tongues, and souls. And it doesn’t even matter whether they fit together. Just millions. Just flesh. Human flesh” (Rand 403). In the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, that cost of ‘self-sacrifice’ was one’s individuality—the defining factors that allowed one human to be unique, different from the rest. “There are things in men,” Andrei Taganov argues in the face of his Party, “in the best of us, which are above...
“The Slynx”, the first novel of Tatyana Tolstaya, had been under process of writing for nearly 14 years and was finally released in 2000. Tatyana Tolstaya is a Russian author, who began her writing career in mid-1980s as a publisher of short stories in various literary magazines. In 1986 she started working on “The Slynx”, a.k.a. “Кысь”. This novel is an intentional example of writing during the censorship period. Therefore, it is largely inter-textual, ironical and, most importantly, Aesopian. The plot is based in “the town of Fyodor-Kumichsk” (Tolstaya 10), which is in fact, the city of Moscow, 200 years after a mysterious and apocalyptic catastrophe – the Blast. The society, however, is not advanced at all, it reminds more of the medieval communities full of exclusion, inequality, tyranny and illiteracy.
In these texts Appollonius and soviet Moscow society function inimically to the forces of imagination and negative capability. These characters represent sobriety and reason. They attempt to limit and control the narrative and the forces of the imagination-which often exceed their powers. A systemic vision of knowledge binds both the Muscovites and Appollonius. Both parties rely on the certainty of this knowledge to inoculate them from the more frightening and unstable aspects of existence. Through categorization they hope to contro...
Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment begins with Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov living in poverty and isolation in St. Petersburg. The reader soon learns that he was, until somewhat recently, a successful student at the local university. His character at that point was not uncommon. However, the environment of the grim and individualistic city eventually encourages Raskolnikov’s undeveloped detachment and sense of superiority to its current state of desperation. This state is worsening when Raskolnikov visits an old pawnbroker to sell a watch. During the visit, the reader slowly realizes that Raskolnikov plans to murder the woman with his superiority as a justification. After the Raskolnikov commits the murder, the novel deeply explores his psychology, yet it also touches on countless other topics including nihilism, the idea of a “superman,” and the value of human life. In this way, the greatness of Crime and Punishment comes not just from its examination of the main topic of the psychology of isolation and murder, but the variety topics which naturally arise in the discussion.
His desire to avoid discipline is dimming as he realizes his time to receive punishment is approaching. Preceding his nerve-rattling last conversation with Porfiry, Raskolnikov seemed lost and disoriented. Terrified of accepting his repercussions, he is at a loss as to how to continue.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Hansen, Bruce. “Dostoevsky’s Theodicy.” Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, 1996. At . accessed 18 November 2001.
In Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment, Raskalnikov undergoes a period of extreme psychological upheaval. By comparing this death and rebirth of Raskalnikov's psyche to the story of the resurrection of Lazarus, Dostoevsky emphasizes not only the gravity of his crimes, but also the importance of acceptance of guilt.
Nikolai Gogol has been widely recognized as one of the most inspiring and remarkable authors of the Russian Empire and the one who produced an enormous impact on literary work of countless contemporaries and successors, both in the Tsarist Russia and abroad. Particularly, Gogol’s literary legacy is praised for his exceptional ability to deploy humor as a means of expression and the way to convey the message. In this respect, the short story The Overcoat written during the St. Petersburg period of Gogol’s activity is a very important work which balances between tragic and humorous elements and presents a brilliant specimen of satire. In this work, Gogol builds up the powerful criticism of the contemporary Russian society with its social hierarchy,
This man is the absolute opposite of everything society holds to be acceptable. Here is a man, with intelligent insight, lucid perception, who is self-admitted to being sick, depraved, and hateful. A man who at every turn is determined to thwart every chance fate offers him to be happy and content. A man who actively seeks to punish and humiliate himself. Dostoyevsky is showing the reader that man is not governed by values which society holds to be all important.
According to Raskolnikov’s theory in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s “Crime and Punishment”,there are two types of people that coexist in the world; the “Extraordinary” and the “Ordinary”. The ordinary men can be defined as “Men that have to live in submission, have no right to transgress the law, because they are ordinary.”(248). To the contrary “extraordinary” men are “Men that have a right to commit any crime and to transgress the law in any way , just because they are extraordinary”(248). Dostoevsky’s theory is evident through the characters of his novel. The main character, Raskolnikov, uses his theory of extraordinary men to justify contemplated murder. There is a sense of empowerment his character experiences with the ability to step over social boundaries. He is led to believe the killing of the pawnbroker is done for the perseverance of the greater good. It is ironic that character who is shown to be powerful in the early stages of the novel subsequently go on to show many weaknesses.