Klondike Gold Rush Rhetorical Analysis

Many stories share the same topic in different views. Usually much of the information is the same because the story is based on facts however, the mood and tone is different because the author creates it. With the point of view of this person about the Gold Rush, we now know how they felt about it and what it was like. Some people could have been happy to have been part of the Gold Rush some might be upset or mad or even scared. In the story “Klondike Gold Rush” the author is describing what the Gold Mining point of view era was. The narrator expresses a tone through that minors had a choice, such as if they wanted to stay or go home. The narrator then begins to tell the obstacles of the travel of a minor would face to get to the mind. In the article “Klondike Gold Rush” by Gordon stables the text states, “A three week trip, the miners lost their lives or their possessions when their boats broke up in the rapids” (Stables, 8). He is showing us how some of the people in the Gold Rush went through alot. In the article “Klondike

The narrator talks about outside forces that affected the minors lives, if they decided to take the job. In the passage it states, “Anyone going into the country has no right to cut wood for any purpose, or to kill any game or catch any fish,without a license for which a free of ten dollars must be paid”(Sullivan,5).Minors were not allowed to fish or hunt without a permit.In the passage it states,”A person wishing to prospect for gold must first procure a miner’s license paying ten dollars for it”(Sullivan,2). A gold had a huge tax, not only that but you had a license you need to buy so you can be able to do it and some of the time if the claim is thought to be poor they get a fifteen dollar fee.Many minors died during the process and those who didn’t were not happy with the end