Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature review on gender education course
Literature review on gender education course
Literature review on gender education course
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literature review on gender education course
The film Kinsey portrays the life of Alford Charles Kinsey a biologist who studied human sexuality. Thought the film we see Professor Kinsey work to try and understand human sexuality. His research lead to understanding what people did in their personal lives versus what society thought they did. Kinsey work helped people understand their own sexualities and how to have healthy relationships. This essay will examine the Kinsey film and examine facts that I thought were extremely interesting and that I was not aware of or facts that disturbed me. I will also state why these specific scenes stood out to me. The film Kinsey was so full of surprises for me; I was not familiar with the work of Kinsey and the impact that he had on the lives of so many people. I am very passionate about sex education and what I found really interesting was how open Kinsey was with his students when it came to sex and the fact that he taught a sex education course especially seeing the times he was living in. During the film we see that Kinsey wants to teach a sex education course (marriage course) because he has multiple students ask him for advice and he sees how …show more content…
They were just basically saying don’t have sex and the students were shown pictures of what STDs could look like on a person. This part really stood out to me because this is similar to the sex education that I received. . In the U.S. most states to this day are not required to provide students with medically accurate information when it comes to sex. Most schools teach abstinence only sex education and that has lead to disastrous results of high teen pregnancy rate and STD cases. There was a point in the film where the was brief discussion about a STD spreading I believe it was chlamydia and that just hit me because just last year there was a chlamydia outbreak in a Texas High
At the beginning of the 1900s, there was a “sexual revolution” in New York City. During this time, sexual acts and desires were not hidden, but instead they were openl...
Vern L. Bullough, “Alfred Kinsey and the Kinsey Report: Historical Overview and Lasting Contributions”, The Journal of Sex Research 35 no. 2 (May 1998): 127.
The movie Night John was incredible with its expression of such realistic telling of slave lives and the passion they had to be free. The movie which centers on the young Sarnay from birth through an amazing journey of learning to read. John is the Harriet Tubman of the movie standing as more of mythical figure rather than just a man. He was bent on freeing other slaves so much he returned from the North to help others see the light. In my opinion the light, or freedom, that John was trying to bring and instill was that of knowledge and the power that could arise from this knowledge without fear of the consequences. He uses a pupil to instill power, but also confidence to stand up and want more freedom. After being showed how to read there
I definitely agree with that statement, since I have went through elementary, middle, and high school once. The video talks about how teachers often do not go into much detail when talking about sex. In fact, all they really teach is abstinence. In reality, many teenagers are deciding to have sex. In fact, we talked in class about how kids are starting to have sex at a younger age. Therefore, people need to be educated much more about sex. When I was in high school, a good friend of mine got a girl pregnant, when they were both 17 years old. I couldn’t believe it. I thought that was the craziest thing I had ever heard. Now looking back, it’s really not that rare to see. Some other things I remember from high school like it was yesterday was having to listen to my buddies talk about who they thought was the hottest girl and who they slept with last weekend. It was either that, or listening to them talk about what they did with their girlfriend the night beforehand. Looking back, I realize how disgusting and inappropriate we were. The thing is, that’s pretty much all high school guys talk about. I’ve had some extremely horny friends that could not keep it in their pants. That being said, schools need to do a much better job at teaching sexual education, and ways to approach sex from more than an abstinence only point of
Masters and Johnson were a pioneering team in the field of human sexuality, both in the domains of research and therapy. William Howell Masters, a gynecologist, was born in Cleveland, Ohio in 1915. Virginia Eshelman Johnson, a psychologist, was born in Springfield, Montana in 1925. To fully appreciate their contribution, it is necessary to see their work in historic context. In 1948, Alfred C. Kinsey and his co-workers, responding to a request by female students at Indiana University for more information on human sexual behavior, published the book Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. They followed this five years later with Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. These books began a revolution in social awareness of and public attention given to human sexuality. At the time, public morality severely restricted open discussion of sexuality as a human characteristic, and specific sexual practices, especially sexual behaviors that did not lead to procreation. Kinsey's books, which among other things reported findings on the frequency of various sexual practices including homosexuality, caused a furor. Some people felt that the study of sexual behavior would undermine the family structure and damage American society. It was in this climate - one of incipient efforts to break through the denial of human sexuality and considerable resistance to these efforts - that Masters and Johnson began their work. Their primary contribution has been to help define sexuality as a healthy human trait and the experience of great pleasure and deep intimacy during sex as socially acceptable goals. As a physician interested in the nature of sexuality and the sexual experience, William Masters wanted to conduct research that would lead to an objective understanding of these topics. In 1957, he hired Virgina Johnson as a research assistant to begin this research issue. Together they developed polygraph-like instruments that were designed to measure human sexual response. Using these tools, Masters and Johnson initiated a project that ultimately included direct laboratory observation and measurement of 700 men and women while they were having intercourse or masturbating. Based on the data collected in this study, they co-authored the book Human Sexual Response in 1966. In this book, they identify and describe four phases in the human sexual response cycle : excitement, plateau, orgasm, and resolution. By this point in time, the generally repressive attitude toward sexuality was beginning to lift and the book found a ready audience.
References to Kurt Freund’s studies to “assess sexual arousal in men and women” and Alfred Kinsey’s “sexual orientation” scale are made to further explain how sexuality and asexuality are not solid concepts with strict definitions of their own but rather more multifarious. For
The construction of human sexuality has been and remains an enigma in today’s society. The prominent and well fought debate can be compacted into one simple title: Nature vs. Nurture. There is no clear answer to how our human sexuality is formed.
The issues of sexual ethics in relation to morality and perversion have been addressed in depth by each of the gentleman at this table. Sexual activity as described by Solomon and Nagle is comprised of a moral standard and ‘naturalness’ aspect. So, in claiming an act is perverted we must first examine it through a moral framework and understand how this interacts with the ‘naturalness’ of a particular act. Solomon makes the distinction as follows “Perversion is an insidious concept…To describe an activity as perverse is not yet a full blown moral condemnation, for it need not entail that one ought not to indulge in such activities.” Along with the examination of the nature of an act, there must be clear justification as to why sexual acts deserve special separate ethical principles. The question arises: does an act simply due to its sexual nature deserve a separate form of moral inquisition than other acts that occur in nature? In this essay I shall argue that perversion and immorality are not mutually exclusive. By this I mean that a sexual act that is, by my definition, immoral must also be perverted. It is also my contention that if an act is perverted we must also define it as immoral. This second part of the argument is contrary to what many of you have claimed. At the outset of this paper I would also like to state my support of Thomas Nagel’s argument holding that the connection between sex and reproduction has no bearing on sexual perversion. (Nagel 105)
With the constant representation and naturalization of the discourse, heterosexuality is an identity assumed unconsciously. Heterosexuality is experienced so frequently is it no longer witnessed. It has become normalized. A simple way of explaining this process is the naturalization of sexuality. There is the continual framing of what sexual practices are natural based upon people’s biological and instinctual need to reproduce. In other words, sexuality isn’t deemed to be an exercise of agency, rather it is implemented as person’s identity from birth similarly to gender. The notion heterosexuality stems primarily from a biological sense of reproducing gives way to the mentality of it being the norm because that’s how the body was designed to work. However, this theory is socially constructed. The discourses of science explaining sexuality are produced by institutions to reinforce and maintain their power. This power conservation is demonstrated by heterosexuality’s dominance in the media, privileges deriving from heterosexuality and the correspondence between heterosexuality and gender. Heterosexuality is the identity that can’t be
Nicholas Goldberg and,Michele Ingrassia. "TEENAGERS & SEX SEX EDUCATION DEBATE what should be Taught? this Third Part of a Series Examines how the AIDS Crisis has Intruded upon the Sometimes Bitter Controversy Over the Responsibility of the Schools." Newsday, Combined editions ed.: 03. Jun 23 1987. ProQuest. Web. 21 Mar. 2014 .
Under threats such as “asexual are just people who need to get raped hard and often enough” and “Just kill yourself, please seriously, just die. Please kill yourself. In a very painful way” a community of very brave people come together to create a name and a place for themselves (qtd. in Swankivy). From most every age group, religion, nationality, and sex these people are united by only one common denominator – they fall into category “X” of Alfred Kinsey’s scale of human sexuality.
On the other hand Brantenberg’s novel exploits the real worlds views of sexuality and applies them in th...
One of the earliest proposed definitions of asexuality came from the famed Alfred Kinsey in 1948, who called it “a lack of sexual behavior associated with a lack of sexual response to erotic stimuli” (Houdenhove, “Asexuality” 1). Later re-definitions include “a lack of sexual behavior associated with a lack of sexual desire” in 1977, “a lack of sexual orientation” in 1980, “a lack of sexual behavior” in 1993, and “a lack of sexual desire or excitement” in 2007 (Houdenhove, “Asexuality” 1; Yule 1). It was not until 2016 that researchers recommending using the definition that asexuals had been using to define themselves (which had also undergone some modifications), describing asexuality as “a lack of sexual attraction” (Houdenhove, “Asexuality” 1). It is interesting to note that all of these definitions define asexuality as “a lack of ______”, as it implies that there is something that asexuals are missing and that they are not complete, but the currently used definition at least describes the phenomenon in a way that is satisfactory to almost all who discuss asexuality.
My opposition would say that sex education is beneficial because it teaches children about pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases in this "mean, scary, dangerous world" or it helps children understand the opposite sex, or it helps children read the signs of what is bad touching. These topics alone would be acceptable, but sex education classes in elementary schools are not stopping there. According to the curriculum, "Learning About Family Life," by Barbara Sprung, an early-childhood educator, was published by the Rutgers University Press. This curriculum, for pupils from kindergarten through third grade, includes information on intercourse, masturbation, reproduction, fetal growth, and many other debatable topics. This book alone has provoked much discussion and argument and, in one school district, a bitter confrontation between officials and a group of parents (Shaheen 1). For those of you who believe the above topics are inappropriate for young chi...
First, sex education gives the children general knowledge about the sexual side of life, such as the differences between boys and girls and puberty. Teachers must clearly and intelligibly ...