King Vs Burwell Case Study

495 Words1 Page

The case of King v. Burwell was based on an interpretation of the premium tax credits associated with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. The suit claimed that only people participating in the state-run health care exchanges qualified for the tax credits according to the new health care statutes. Upon review by the United States Supreme Court, that claim and subsequent petition were rejected with the reason being that the case's understanding of the requirements for the premium tax credits was incorrect and the statute could stand as it is.

The King v. Burwell Decision and the Affordable Care Act

The Affordable Care Act allows individuals and families to enroll in health coverage either through federal or state exchanges, depending on what a specific …show more content…

Employers who do not offer an employee healthcare can leave them open to a different type of financial responsibility. Employees who qualify for a premium tax credit, in turn qualify their employers for a provision called the Employer Shared Responsibility.

This provision requires employers who have employees who qualify for the premium tax credits, and subsequently do not offer their own healthcare alternative, to share in the financial responsibility of paying for the insurance of the employee(s) in question.

Tax Credits

Employees

In order to obtain a premium tax credit, very specific criteria must be met. All of the following requirements are needed to qualify for a premium tax credit:

Health insurance must be purchased through the Federal or State Exchange
Minimal, affordable health insurance is not offered through an employer
Income falls within specific limits
Do not file tax returns under a Married Filing Separately form (unless special circumstances allow this)
Employee is not a dependent on another person's tax

Open Document