King Solomon Research Paper

1734 Words4 Pages

As David aged, the urgency was to appoint the next king. In accordance to the Davidic covenant, the throne had to be passed on to the son of David. This matter had to be settled swiftly and decisively when David was still alive to avoid a civil war when his sons battled for the throne. Eventually, Solomon the son of Bathsheba was appointed king of Israel. This section discusses the Solomon’s succession, wisdom and reign.

1. Solomon's Succession (1 Kings 1-2)
The transition of the kingship from David to his son was far from smooth. The succession to the throne of David was shrouded in plots and counter-plots. The two sons of David who were vying for the throne were Adonijah and Solomon. The stage was set for a battle of wits to get the favour …show more content…

The extent of Solomon’s rule, military resources, wealth and prestige represented the pinnacle of Israel’s power (1 Kings 4:21) (Davies 2011:49). Solomon worked hard at establishing political alliances, strengthening military defences, expanding economic ventures and building the Temple. Firstly, Solomon expanded Israel’s territories through his astute political and economic manoeuvring. His first political alliance was made with Egypt and sealed through marriage with Pharaoh’s daughter (1 Kings 3:1) (Unger 1954:118). This arrangement resulted in the growth of Solomon’s harem to mammoth proportion (1 Kings 11:1-3). These wives and concubines also turned the heart of Solomon away from God (1 Kings 11:4-8). On the economic front, Solomon established an alliance with king Hiram I of the maritime nation of Phoenicia (1 Kings 5:1-12) (Unger 1954:114). Tyre would be instrumental in supplying Israel with much of the building material for Solomon’s ambitious building projects. Secondly, Solomon spent much time and resources to strengthen his military defences. He fortified key cities like Jerusalem, Hazor, Megiddo and Gezer (1 Kings 9:15-19). Solomon had 4000 stalls for his horses, 1400 chariots and 12000 charioteers (1 Kings 10:26) (Hens-Pizza 2006:52; Brindle 1984:223). Thirdly, Israel was strategically located on the north-south land routes from …show more content…

He had allowed his own appetites and wisdom to rise above God’s revealed purposes (Davies 2011:56). This slide into apostasy was a gradual process. It all started with Solomon’s pragmatic policies that compromised on the standards set by the Sinai covenant. Solomon’s covenant failure had dire consequences. There were four areas where the policies of Solomon had gone beyond covenant stipulations. Firstly, Solomon’s building projects, military establishment and administrative structure were exerting great stress on the national budget (Bright 1981:220). Secondly, Solomon had to fund his spending with extensive and burdensome taxation (Bright 1981:221; Unger 1954:115). The country was organized into twelve administrative districts for taxation purposes (1 Kings 4:7-19). Each district were responsible for one month of the court’s expenses per year (1 Kings 4:27). However, Solomon did not include Judah, who apparently enjoyed a tax-free status (Brindle 1984:226). This would be a further cause of tribal discontent. Thirdly, Solomon’s building projects needed a large amount of labour. To make up for the shortage, Solomon conscripted the Israelites as labourers in Lebanon felling timber (1 Kings 5:13-14) (Bright 1981:222). The number was a startling 30000 people! (Lasor et al. 1982:154) This was aggravated by the fact that Solomon sold twenty towns in northern Galilee to king Hiram of Tyre

Open Document