Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of Henry VIII
Impact of Henry VIII
What impact has henry viii had on modern society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Political and religious turmoil during Henry VIII’s reign (r. 1509-1547) resulted in Henry VIII assuming the roles as head of both the state and the Church of England through the separation of the Church of England from papal authority, the dissolution of monarchies, and the ‘Act of Supremacy’. Fundamental changes to the English constitution and the establishment of precedent features regarding Parliamentarian inclusion came as a result of opposition during his time on the throne. King Henry VIII’s reign is arguably the largest reason as to why England was so successful during Queen Elizabeth I’s reign from 1558-1603. This paper will chronicle the events of large scale that developed his historic reign and the perpetual changes to the English …show more content…
People everywhere, regardless of class, were disturbed with the scandals and actions taken by the Church. Born a Catholic, Henry enforced the notion that Catholicism was to be the religion of his kingdom. However, after eighteen years of marriage and only one female survivor heir with Catherine of Aragon, Henry began an affair with Anne Boleyn in 1527. Completely enamoured by Boleyn and the pressure to have a male heir to the throne, he requested an annulment of the marriage, proving very difficult as the union required special dispensation as Catherine was the wife of Henry’s deceased brother, a union that is “prohibited by both canon and biblical law” . Due to the difficulty presented from papal authority and a disagreement with Pope Clement VII (1478-1534), Henry’s new royal advisers, Thomas Cranmer (1489-1556) and Thomas Cromwell (1485-1540), found a way around the complicated matrix surrounding the situation: “Why not simply declare the king supreme in English spiritual affairs as he was in English temporal affairs? Then the king could settle the king’s affair himself” . Thus, with the help of his advisers, Henry VIII began to separate the Church of England from the Papacy in Rome, ushering in the theory of the divine right of kings in the …show more content…
Officially passing religious authority to the monarch of England from the Pope in 1534 “gave the crown control over the wealth and buildings of the old Church [and] settled official religious doctrine” . The act decried him as “the only supreme head of the Church of England” , and granted the English crown “all honours, dignities, preeminences, jurisdictions, privileges, authorities, immunities, profits, and commodities to the said dignity” . As a result of the passing of the Act of Supremacy, the Parliament of England helped Henry usher in the theory of the divine right of kings. The divine right of king’s is a doctrine of legitimacy in political and religious affairs which enforced that kings established their authority from God and were therefore not subjected to any earthly authority, including his people, the aristocracy, or any other estate of the monarch’s kingdom. Any monarch who ruled under the divine right had the power to do whatever they saw fit. It also required English subjects to swear an oath of loyalty, forcing them to recognize and accept Henry’s marriage to Anne Boleyn and her coronation as queen. This parliamentary act remained until it was repealed during Edward VI’s reign, Henry’s only male heir, in 1555, only to be
“The key factor in limiting royal power in the years 1399-1509 was the king’s relationship with parliament.”
...olitical needs of the time, which was the divorce of Henry from Catherine of Aragon in 1533, in order for Cromwell to fulfil his king’s wish; he pragmatically detached the problematic Pope and his Holy Roman Empire from England to resolve the Great Matter by having to (not wanting to) reform the Parliament, consequentially morphing England into a sovereign state. The bureaucratic reformation which is argued by Elton to be a part of the revolution in Tudor government once again boils down to Cromwell’s loyal servitude to the king, addressing the financial problem of Henry’s with a series of solutions which would certainly benefit the King in the long term. The work of Cromwell was not revolutionary as it failed to survive the several changes of monarchy (excluding the work achieving sovereignty) and did occur in a swift manner how revolution realistically would occur.
The Elizabethan Deliverance - Arthur Bryant Reformation and Revolution 1558-1660 - Robert Ashton Elizabeth and her Parliaments - J.E. Neales Elizabeth and her Reign - Richard Salter Elizabeth I and religion 1558-1603 - Susan Doran Tudor England - John Guy Elizabeth I - David Starkey
After many failed attempts to obtain a divorce from his first wife Catherine of Aragon, King Henry VIII took momentous steps that led to "The Reformation," a significant occurrence in the history of religion. Prior to the reformation, all of England's inhabitants including King Henry VIII prescribed to Catholicism. In fact, King Henry VIII was such a strong supporter that he was given the title "Defender of the Faith" by the pope for his efforts in protecting Catholicism against the Protestants. However, all these changed upon the pope's denial of Henry's request for a divorce.
Henry VIII’s reign was a turning point in the Tudor period as it signified an end to Yorkist pretenders to the throne and it was at this point that the idea of regicide... ... middle of paper ... ... to support them in their rebellions. There was now a widening social gap that created tension as the gentry attempted to emulate the nobility. As although the Cloth trade in Kent was declining in 1554 Wyatt’s rebellion had no real socio – economic cause and the Northern Earls in 1569 and Essex in 1601 had no socio –economic causes whatsoever.
However, he would also stress the importance for a centralized religious authority. Henry VIII used the church and the idea of the church being all powerful in combination with the monarchy to solidify his position as a strong ruler. When Henry VIII had to repeatedly ask the church for permission to take action with his marriages and life, he realized that he was limited by the church. Henry VIII wanted to be all powerful, and having to answer to the church meant that he was not. In 1533 he passed the Act in Restraint of Appeals. This act, which stripped the papacy the right of taking judicial action, made Henry VIII the highest judicial authority in England. This was his first move to take some of the power away from the church, while still leaving it as a respected institution involved with the state. Shortly after though, in 1534, Henry VIII passed the Act of Supremacy. This created the Anglican Church of England, and named Henry VIII the head of it. This break with the Catholic church and merge of head of church with the head of state was not an action made to create a more holy and divine nation, it was political. He knew that the path to true power and control was through the church and he used it to his advantage. The relationship that Henry VIII forced between the church and his position as head of state made it essentially impossible for him and his rule to be
He reestablished the authority of the crown, reintroducing the idea that he, as head of the monarch, is “Henry, by the grace of God, King of England”. This title places an emphasis on the idea that his power and the power of all royals has been given to them by God Himself, and idea that is demonstrated in the Act for the Confirmation of Henry VII. This act of Parliament illustrates the king’s superiority, his superiority over Parliament, which was given to him by God, and therefore emphasizes his undoubted right to the throne of England and France. In the Act for the Confirmation of Henry VII, Parliament confirmed him and his heirs as the lawful sovereigns of England. There were uncertainties about his claim to the throne to begin with, but by calling Parliament as King, he not only proved his prestige, but also showed that Parliament does not grant him that title, they merely clarify any “ambiguities and questions” about his title. It is clearly stated in the Confirmation that Henry is also the King of France, highlighting the English belief that they have rightful claim to lands outside of Britain. This act clearly established the Tudor’s sovereign
One of the consequences of the Act was that the first allegiance of the clergy was changed from the papacy to Henry VIII. As well as this, traditional privileges the Church was entitled such as the benefit of the Clergy and sanctuary were abolished .This implies that the Act of Supremacy 1534 played a greater role in changing the relationship between the Church and State because it undermined the authority of the church within England as the controlling of the church’s finances, administration and development was shifted Henry. All of these changes suggest that the previous close relationship between the Church and state had weakened as they contributed to the paving for the growth of Protestantism. In addition, despite the fact both the Acts of Supremacy reinforced royal control, Henry being confirmed as ‘Supreme Head of Church’ would have had a greater impact on the relationship between the Church and State in the 16th century than Elizabeth becoming ‘Supreme Governor’ because Elizabeth’s title still applied that the pope was supreme head whilst Henry’s highlighted the fact that Henry was the only head of church - further undermining the influence of the
With any new monarch’s ascension to the throne, there comes with it changes in the policies of the country. From Elizabeth’s new council, to Henry’s documented polices and even to William the Silent’s inaction in response to threats were all policies that needed to be worked out by the new rulers. This group of rulers all had something in common; they chose to let their people make their religious preference solely on their beliefs but they all differed in their ways of letting this come about. This was monumental for the time period in which they lived, but it was something that needed to be done to progress national unity.
Laud’s attempts to make the Church more conformed coincided with King Charles I’s personal rule without parliament. In fact, Charles embarked on policies which made the English feel under threat. The Venetian ambassador in London wrote Charles had “changed the principles by which his predecessors reigned…if the road he has taken will lead him to absolute royalty, which is definitely the goal he has set for himself” (Young 106). Even though many English...
Loach, Jennifer. “Mary Tudor And The Re-Catholicisation Of England.” History Today 44.11 (1994): 16. World History Collection. Web. 18 Nov.2013
In the play Henry V written by Shakespeare. Henry was presented as the ideal Christian king. His mercy, wisdom, and other characteristics demonstrated the behavior of a Christian king. Yet at the same time he is shown to be man like any other. The way he behaves in his past is just like an ordinary man. But in Henry’s own mind he describes himself as “the mirror of all Christian kings” and also a “true lover of the holly church.
In 1603, James Stuart became King James I of England, uniting the countries of England and Scotland under a single ruler for the first time. The English Crown would have given James lots of wealth and prestige but it would also present him with many problems. This report will aim to explore both the positive and negatives aspects of four key areas - the political system, the social hierarchy, the economy and religion – and to assess the situation that James would have been in when he first began to rule England.
Pressing for action, Protestant reformers sought out Parliament for the safest recourse. For the first time in England, Edward VI’s reign had brought about the formation of Protestantism with changes that involved the abolishment of clerical celibacy, Mass and the obligation of required religious services in English. Following Edward VI’s death, just six years later, his half-sister Mary took over the throne. With her strong beliefs in papal supremacy, Mary made an effort to put an end to the corruptness her brother had brought about for the Catholic Church. Had Mary lived longer, the reestablishment of the Catholic Church might have been successful, leaving Edward’s reign, rather than hers, as a historical
Henry VIII and Queen Elizabeth I may have been the English Reformation’s greatest benefactors, all because of self interest. Henry VIII was not originally Protestant, but after the pope denied him of his divorce, Henry VIII took things into his own hands. Due to the power kings had in the Middle Ages, Henry VIII was able to control Parliament and force it to do whatever he wanted. So in 1534, Henry VIII forced Parliament to pass a law he made known as the Act of Supremacy. The Act of Supremacy stated that the king ought to be the head of the Church of England. This law gave the king complete power over the Church of England, instead of the pope. However, the type of church and state relationship did not change. Rather all the Act of Supremacy did was take power from the pope and give it to the king. Surprisingly, the Catholics did not retaliate against this strong change. The pope had always been the head of the church, but now the king had taken his position. This serves as an example of nationalism. The Catholics did not think about how removing the pope could harm their religion in any way. However, instead the people blindly followed Henry VIII because he was the leader of the nation and they assumed he was right. Also, by imposing other laws that punished Protestants, Henry VIII did not give the people much of a choice. Fortunately, for Henry VII, nationalis...